President Hosts Hanukkah Receptions

President Obama yesterday hosted an afternoon and an evening Hanukkah Reception at the White House. In his remarks (full text) at the afternoon reception, he paid tribute to Elie Wiesel who died this year and called on Wiesel's granddaughter to light a Hanukkah menorah.  The evening reception (video of reception remarks) was attended by a number of government officials and the menorah was lit by family members of the late Israeli president Shimon Peres.

UPDATE: Here is the full text of the President's remarks at the evening reception.

Congress Strengthens International Religious Freedom Act

On Tuesday, Congress gave final passage to H.R. 1150, the Frank R. Wolf International Religious Freedom Act (full text). The bill, which amends the 1998 International Religious Freedom Act, is summarized in a press release by Rep. Chris Smith, the bill's sponsor:

The bill will improve U.S. religious freedom diplomacy efforts globally; better train and equip diplomats to counter extremism; address anti-Semitism and religious persecution and mitigate sectarian conflict.  The bill:

• Creates a “Designated Persons List” for individuals who commit egregious violations of religious freedom
• Creates a comprehensive religious prisoners list—persons who are detained, imprisoned, tortured and subject to forced renunciation of faith.
• Integrates religious freedom into every aspect of U.S. foreign policy
• Strengthens the Special Advisor for religious freedom at the National Security Council
• Requires international religious freedom training for all Foreign Service Officers
• Requires that the Ambassador-at-Large for International Religious Freedom report directly to the Secretary of State
• Elevates the position of the ambassador within the federal government
• Creates an “Entity of Particular Concern” designation for non-state actors like terrorist groups
• Requires more frequent presidential actions to counter severe religious freedom violations globally
• Creates a “Special Watch List”—two tier system at State (CPC countries/Special Watch List)
• Sets congressional expectations for staffing of the IRF office and expansion of Religious Freedom Program grants

The bill also provides:

The freedom of thought, conscience, and religion is understood to protect theistic and non-theistic beliefs and the right not to profess or practice any religion.

The bill now goes to the President for his signature.

Swiss Court Says Anti-Muslim Referendum Is Invalid

Daily Sabah reports that yesterday Switzerland's Federal Tribunal held that a referendum supported by the right-wing Swiss People's Party is unconstitutional. The referendum was an attempt to prevent state funding of the University of Fribourg's Swiss Centre for Islam and Society. Four of the high court's 5 judges agreed with the Fribourg regional Parliament that the referendum is unconstitutional because it singles out a particular religion.

Texas School District Nixes Charlie Brown Christmas Poster

In Kileen, Texas, the school board on Tuesday voted to support a middle school principal who told a staff member to take down a 6-foot tall Peanuts character Christmas poster. The principal acted because the poster shows Linus saying: "For unto you is born this day in the City of David a savior which is Christ the Lord...  That’s what Christmas is all about Charlie Brown." The Fort Worth Star-Telegram reports that the poster had been placed by a staff member on the front door of the school nurse’s office. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton had urged the school district to allow the poster, contending that it was protected by the state's "Merry Christmas Law" that protects certain holiday displays in schools. (See prior posting.)

Court Invalidates Louisiana Executive Order Barring LGBT Discrimination

A Louisiana state trial court yesterday struck down as a violation of separation of powers Louisiana Governor John Bel Edwards Executive Order No. JBE 2016-11 (April 13, 2016) (See prior posting). The executive order bars state agencies and offices from discriminating on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity, as well as on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, political affiliation, disability or age. In Louisiana Department of Justice v. Edwards, (LA Dist. Ct., Dec. 14, 2016), a challenge to the Democratic Governor's Executive Order brought by the state's Republican Attorney General was successful, the court stating in part:

Executive Order JBE-16-11 constitutes an unlawful ultra-vires act because, regardless of the defendant's intent, the effect of its adoption and implementation, creates new and/or expands upon existing Louisiana law as opposed to directing the faithful execution of existing laws of this state pursuant to the authority granted unto the office of the Governor to issue executive orders.

The New Orleans Times Picayune reports on the decision.

Alabama's CJ Roy Moore Files Brief In Appeal of His Suspension

As previously reported, in September Alabama's 9-member Court of the Judiciary (COJ) concluded that Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice Roy Moore violated various Canons of Judicial Ethics in issuing an order to state probate judges telling them they had a duty under Alabama law to refuse to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples. The COJ suspended Moore from office for the remaining two years of his term.  This decision is now on appeal to a specially constituted bench of the Alabama Supreme Court, the regular Justices having recused themselves. Yesterday, Moore filed a 95-page brief setting out his arguments. The brief summarizes them in part as follows:

The JIC [Judicial Inquiry Commission and the COJ did not have the jurisdiction or authority to review the Administrative Orders of the Chief Justice, as such authority is placed solely in this Court.

The COJ violated Rule 16 by imposing a de facto removal (i.e., permanent suspension without pay) upon Chief Justice Moore without the unanimous concurrence of all sitting members....

All charges against Chief Justice Moore must be dismissed because they have no legal basis and are not supported by clear and convincing evidence.... 

Section 159 of the Alabama Constitution, which imposes an automatic suspension upon the mere filing of a complaint with the COJ, represents a gross violation of due process in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment....

The JIC violated the confidentiality mandated by the Alabama Constitution and Rule 5 by disclosing information about Chief Justice Moore’s matter prior to filing charges and the penalty should be dismissal of all charges.

Liberty Counsel issued a press release announcing the filing of the brief.

Court Grants Variance To Allow Digital Church Sign

In Antioch Community Church v. Board of Zoning Adjustment, (MO App., Dec. 13, 2016), a Missouri state appeals court held that the Kansas City Zoning Adjustment Board abused its discretion when it refused to grant a church a variance from the city's sign ordinance.  The church modified its sign which displayed messages by way of manually hung letters to substitute a digital display.  The upgrade cost the church $11,000, and it installed it unaware that the Kansas City sign code prohibits digital displays on church property in residential zones. In ordering the variance granted, the appeals court said in part:

The Church is on a busy roadway nestled in the middle of considerable commercial development. Its sign does not substantially change the character of the neighborhood, and no evidence was introduced to show a substantial detriment to neighboring properties.

KCUR reports on the decision.

Church-State Gadfly Rob Sherman Dies In Small Plane Crash

Robert Sherman, a leading atheist activist and prolific litigant over church-state issues, died this weekend in the crash of a small plane he was piloting.  The Poplar Grove, Illinois resident hosted a popular radio talk show for 22 years; the final show was broadcast in 2007.  As reported by the Chicago Sun-Times:

In the 1980s and 1990s, Mr. Sherman was constantly in the headlines for atheism activism.

As Sun-Times columnist Richard Roeper put it in 1998, “He has battled towns from South Holland to Deerfield to Zion to Palatine to Highland, Ind., and Wauwatosa, Wis., over public displays of religious symbols on water towers, on government property and on official village seals.”...

Mr. Sherman’s philosophy, on matters from the practical to the ecclesiastical, was summarized on robsherman.com, a website created to drum up donations for his planned 2018 [Green Party] congressional run in the 12th district....

And, he emphasized the issue that brought him to public attention. “I will sponsor legislation to get ‘In God We Trust’ off of our money, remove ‘One Nation Under God’ from our Pledge of Allegiance, eliminate the National Day of Prayer and repeal Christmas as a federal holiday,” he wrote next to his likeness on a coin proclaiming “In Rob We Trust.”

Discussion of a number of cases brought by Sherman can be found at this link to past Religion Clause postings.

Russia Extends Reach Into France Via New Orthodox Cathedral

A newly-constructed Russian Orthodox Cathedral in the heart of Paris is a symbol of Russian use of religion to extend the country's political reach.  World Policy Blog yesterday reported:

The controversial Sainte-Trinité Russian Orthodox cathedral, set to be consecrated by the Russian Patriarch Kirill in early December, is the result of determined diplomacy by the Kremlin and lobbying of French officials, including François Fillon, the new favorite to win France’s 2017 presidential election....

The $120 million cathedral was financed by the Russian state and backed by President Vladimir Putin. The structure was completed as his country’s relations with France and its NATO allies nosedived over the deployment of Russian firepower in Syria and Ukraine.

While those interventions have come to define Putin’s presidency, the riverside “St Vladimir’s,” as the cathedral has been nicknamed, represents another side of his foreign policy. Also divisive, it is a high water mark in his use of faith and power abroad.

Title VII Can Cover Transgender Discrimination

In Mickens v. General Electric Co., (WD KY, Nov. 29, 2016), s Kentucky federal district court ruled that Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act supports a claim for employment discrimination brought by a transgender African American male employee.  The court said in part:

Significantly, Plaintiff alleges that GE both permitted continued discrimination and harassment against him and subsequently fired him because he did not conform to the gender stereotype of what someone who was born female should look and act like.

WFPL yesterday reported on the decision.

Feds Bring RLUIPA Suit Against County That Barred Mosque Construction

The U.S. Department of Justice announced yesterday that it has filed suit against Culpeper County, Virginia alleging that it violated the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act by denying a sewage permit application to the Islamic Center of Culpeper.  The complaint (full text) in United States v. County of Culpeper, VA, (WD VA, filed 12/12/2016) alleges that denial of the"pump and haul" permit prevents the Islamic Center from building a mosque on land it has purchased. The land's zoning classification permits religious land use by right.

Attorney General Lynch Speaks To Interfaith Event About Hate Crimes

Attorney General Loretta Lynch yesterday spoke on the Justice Department’s Commitment to Combating Hate Crimes (full text of remarks) at an interfaith event held at the All Dulles Area Muslim Society (ADAMS) Center in Reston, Virginia.  She said in part:

[A]ll of us have seen the flurry of recent news reports about alleged hate crimes and harassment – from hijabs yanked off of women’s heads; to swastikas sprayed on the sides of synagogues; to slurs and epithets hurled in classrooms....

These incidents – and these statistics – should be of the deepest concern to every American.  Because hate crimes don’t just target individuals.  They tear at the fabric of our communities, and they also stain our dearest ideals and our nation’s very soul.  There is a pernicious thread that connects the act of violence against a woman wearing a hijab to the assault on a transgender man to the tragic deaths of nine innocent African Americans during a Bible study at Mother Emanuel AME in Charleston, South Carolina.... Regardless of our faith, we believe in our common humanity.... That is why the Department of Justice – and the entire Obama Administration – regards hate crimes with the utmost seriousness, whether they target individuals because of their race, their religion, their gender or their sexual orientation.  And that is why we have worked tirelessly over the last several years to bring those who perpetrate these heinous deeds to justice.

U.S. and Britain Explore Definition of Anti-Semitism

On Dec. 1 the U.S. Senate passed by unanimous consent S.10, the Anti-Semitism Awareness Act of 2016. (ADL press release with background information.) In the convoluted language of much federal legislation, the bill would have instructed the Department of Education to use the definition of Anti-Semitism developed by the State Department's Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Anti-Semitism-- including examples in an accompanying Fact Sheet-- in enforcing Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Title VI prohibits discrimination in programs receiving federal financial assistance.

The basic definition of Anti-Semitism incorporated by the bill is:

Anti-Semitism is a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of anti-Semitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities.

Beyond this, though, the accompanying Fact Sheet includes in the definition of Anti-Semitism criticism of Israel which demonizes Israel, applies a double standard not demanded of any other democratic nation, or denies Israel's right to exist.  As reported last week by The Forward, S.10 has died in the House of Representatives as critics raised concerns that the bill could threaten federal funding at universities where speakers criticize Israel without a push back from college administrators.

Meanwhile yesterday Britain's Prime Minister Theresa May announced that Britain will formally adopt the definition of anti-Semitism developed by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance-- the same definition as the basic statement incorporated in S.10.  This comes after the House of Commons Home Affairs Committee in October published a report on Antisemitism in the UK, and the Government this month published a Response to Home Affairs Committee Report. The Government's Response discusses at some length the question of whether or when criticism of Israel should be classified as Anti-Semitism.

Massachusetts Modifies Reference To Churches As Public Accommodations; Suit Dismissed

Alliance Defending Freedom announced that today the churches and pastors who are plaintiffs in Horizon Christian Fellowship v. Williamson filed a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal in their lawsuit after the Attorney General's Office made a change in its website and the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination made changes to language in a Guidance document on when a church can be considered a place of public accommodation subject to state's ban on discrimination on the basis of gender identity. Originally (see prior posting) the Gender Identity Guidance stated:

Even a church could be seen as a place of public accommodation if it holds a secular event, such as a spaghetti supper, that is open to the general public.

The revised Gender Identity Guidance reads:

The law does not apply to a religious organization if subjecting the organization to the law would violate the organization’s First Amendment rights. See Donaldson v. Farrakhan, 436 Mass. 94 (2002). However, a religious organization may be subject to the Commonwealth’s public accommodations law if it engages in or its facilities are used for a “public, secular function.” Id.

Originally a page on the Attorney General's website had made a categorical reference to "houses of worship" as an example of a "place of public accommodation."  That reference has been dropped.  A letter from the chief of the state's Civil Rights Division explained why the changes were made.

Recent Articles of Interest

From SSRN:

• Kathleen Brady, The Disappearance of Religion from Debates About Religious Accommodation, (20 Lewis & Clark L. Rev., Issue No. 4, in Symposium, Law and Religion in an Increasingly Polarized America, Forthcoming).
• Andrew Koppelman, Lupu, Tuttle, and Singling out Religion, (111 Northwestern University Law Review Online 41 (2016)).
• Avishalom Westreich, Changing Motherhood Paradigms: Jewish Law, Civil Law, and Society, (Hastings Women's Law Journal, Vol. 28, No. 1, Forthcoming).
• Mitchell Landrigan, Protests Outside Abortion Clinics Constitutionally Protected Speech?, (Alternative Law Journal 41(1) 2016).

From elsewhere:

• Steven H. Sholk, A Guide to Election Year Activities of Section 501(c)(3) Organizations, (PLI, 2016 Revision).

Presidential Proclamation Of Human Rights Day and Week

Last Friday, President Obama issued a Presidential Proclamation declaring December 10 as Human Rights Day and the week beginning December 10 as Human Rights Week. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights was adopted by the United Nations General Assembly on December 10, 1948. The Presidential Proclamation reads in part:

Far too many people around the world are still denied their human rights and fundamental freedoms, and we must work to end the discrimination that is too often felt by LGBT individuals, people with disabilities, immigrants, women and girls of all ages, and members of religious, ethnic, and other minorities. And we must strengthen our ongoing efforts to rid the world of violence, oppression, and hatred.

Recent Prisoner Free Exercise Cases

In Pickering v. California Department of Corrections, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 167867 (ED CA, Dec. 5, 2016), a California federal magistrate judge recommended dismissing an inmate's claims that defendants have hindered the practice of his Astru/Odinic faith. However the court recommended that plaintiff be allowed to proceed with his retaliation claim.

In Malone v. Selby, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 168764 (SD IL, Dec. 6, 2016), an Illinois federal district court permitted an inmate to move ahead with a claim that a corrections official destroyed or discarded plaintiff's Bible concordance.

In Lane v. Tavares, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 168965 (MD PA, Dec. 7, 2016), a Pennsylvania federal district court accepted a magistrate's recommendation and allowed a Muslim inmate to move ahead with a claim that the prison doctor intentionally interfered with his attempt to gain safe access to Friday Prayers.

In Alderson v. Kelley, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 168233 (ED AR, Dec. 6, 2016), and Arkansas federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendation (2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 169173, Oct. 28, 2016) and dismissed an inmate's complaint that his request to have a beard for religious reasons was previously denied.

In Willison v. Davis, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 169241 (SD OH, Dec. 7, 2016), an Ohio federal magistrate judge recommended dismissing a suit against the state Religious Services Administrator brought by an inmate who change his religion to Natsarim (Messianic Judaism) and was initially denied kosher meals and participation in the Passover feast.

In Quiero v. Muniz, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 170733 (MD PA, Dec. 8, 2016), a Pennsylvania federal magistrate judge recommended that an inmate be allowed to proceed with his challenge to a policy that denied him access to bible studies, church services, and chaplains while in the restricted housing unit. UPDATE: The court adopted the magistrate's recommendations at 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11766, Jan. 27, 2017.

In Young v. Biter, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 170992 (ED CA, Dec. 9, 2016), a California federal magistrate judge dismissed with leave to amend an inmate's complaint about his ability to practice his religion and denial of a kosher diet.

7th Circuit Hears Oral Arguments Over State Regulation of Bible Colleges

The U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals on Thursday heard oral arguments in Illinois Bible Colleges Association v. Anderson (audio of oral arguments).  In the case, an Illinois federal district court rejected constitutional challenges by a group of Bible Colleges to three Illinois statutes that regulate institutions of higher education in the state, including religiously-affiliated ones. (See prior posting.) [Thanks to James Robideau for the lead.]

Town Sued Over Cross On Christmas Tree

As reported yesterday by Fox 59 News, the ACLU has filed suit on behalf of a resident of Knightstown, Indiana against the city challenging the cross that tops the Christmas tree in the town square. The tree has been displayed for many years. However plaintiff Joseph Tompkins says that the cross is "is the preeminent symbol of Christianity," and this makes the display religious and a violation of the Establishment Clause. Other town residents support the cross and have various ideas for showing their support.

UPDATE: On Dec. 12, the Knightstown Council had the cross atop the Christmas tree removed, saying it could not win the lawsuit filed by the ACLU. Town residents unsuccessfully attempted to block the bucket truck removing the cross. (Fox 59 News).

Briefing Change In SCOTUS Transgender Case May Have Substantive Impact

In October, the U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari in Gloucester County School Board v. G.G., a high profile case on bathroom choice by transgender students in schools receiving federal funds. (See prior posting.) Today SCOTUSblog reports that the Court, in an action that will have unusual impact has extended the time for filing briefs in the case.  The extension of time means that it is more likely that Justice Scalia's vacancy on the Court will be filled before the case is argued, eliminating the chance for a 4-4 split.  In addition, according to Amy Howe at SCOTUSblog:

[T]he schedule change ... means that the federal government’s position in the case will be determined by the Trump, rather than Obama, administration. Deference to the Obama administration’s interpretation of federal law has been a central feature of G.G.’s argument, and it was the basis for the lower court’s ruling in G.G.’s favor. The Trump administration will not take office in time to file a brief supporting the school board, but it could nonetheless reverse course before G.G. files his brief. Such a change could substantially alter the arguments that G.G. makes and the justices consider. Indeed, if the Trump administration does rescind the existing Department of Education letter or issue its own guidance on the question, the justices could opt to send the case back to the lower court for reconsideration in light of that new guidance.