University In The Middle of 1st Amendment Tussle Over Donor's Plaque

The Indianapolis Star reported last Friday on dispute between Purdue University and one of its donors:

When Michael McCracken and his wife made a $12,500 donation to Purdue’s School of Mechanical Engineering in 2012, Purdue asked the engineering graduate to provide an inscription for a conference room dedication plaque, which would be installed in the recently renovated Herrick Laboratories.

But the words McCracken chose, in honor of his parents, turned out to be controversial.

“To those who seek to better the world through the understanding of God’s physical laws and innovation of practical solutions. In honor of Dr. William ‘Ed’ and Glenda McCracken.”

Purdue rejected the proposed inscription, concerned about church-state issues. Its attorney said:

[G]iven the facts here, our status as a public institution, and the hopelessly muddled state of jurisprudence in this particular area, we could fully expect lengthy and expensive litigation that would wipe out the value of this donation many times over, and we just don’t think that’s advisable for either the donor or the university. Still, we remain open to continued discussions, as we’d much prefer to be in the mode of expressing gratitude, not disagreement, to our donors.

The University's hope of avoiding expensive litigation, however, seems unrealistic.  The attorney for the McCrackens wrote the University on Feb. 26 (full text of letter) suggesting alternative language that makes it clearer that the inscription is private speech of the McCrackens. The letter concluded:

Please let us know by March 5, 2014, if you are open to discussing a potential resolution. If not, Dr. McCracken has instructed us to commence litigation to preserve the McCrackens' First Amendment right to reference "God's physical laws" on the plaque. We note that, if thismatter proceedsto litigation and Dr. McCracken prevails, the University will be responsible for his attorneys' fees.

Recent Prisoner Free Exercise Cases

In Yah'Torah v. New Jersey Department of Corrections, 2014 N.J. Super. Unpub. LEXIS 346 (NJ App., Feb. 21, 2014), a New Jersey appellate court concluded that  a Jewish inmate had not shown that his free exercise or RLUIPA rights were violated by the refusal of prison authorities to furnish him goat or sheep meat, grape juice, pistachio nuts, cashew nuts, honeydew melon or watermelon, onions, goat cheese, and leeks to celebrate the New Moon festival.

In Santo Mujahid Islaam v. Greco, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21866 (D NJ, Feb. 21, 2014), a New Jersey federal district court allowed an inmate to proceed with his complaint that he was denied the right to attend Muslim Friday prayer services. Other inmates named in the complaint were given the option of joining the action upon payment of filing fees.

In Toppin v. Kornegay, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21888 (E.D.N.C. Feb. 21, 2014), a North Carolina federal district court rejected a Native American inmate's claim that a search of his cell involving handling of his sacred items box violated his free exercise rights.

In Lizama v. Hendricks, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22955 (D NJ, Feb. 20, 2014), a New Jersey federal district court dismissed without prejudice an inmate's complaint that one of the defendants failed to provide him with his kosher meal.

In Winder v. Maynard, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23038 (D MD, Feb. 24, 2014), a Maryland federal district court dismissed a complaint by a Wiccan inmate that his celebration of the Samhain Feast was impaired when authorities refused to allow Wiccans to prepare and serve pork products through the prison kitchen facilities.

In Johnson v. Lowry, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23216 (ND IN, Feb. 21, 2014), an Indiana federal district court permitted a Native American inmate to move ahead with his free exercise and RLUIPA injunctive action challenging the prison's refusal to allow him to possess various religious items in his cell and to have group services.

In Buckner v. Allen, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22695 (MD AL, Feb. 24, 2014), an Alabama federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendations (2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23724, Feb. 3, 2014) and dismissed a complaint by a Native American inmate alleging denial of tobacco use during religious ceremonies, interruption of ceremonies, limited use of fires and sweat lodge, allowance of gang members on ceremonial grounds, and the chaplain's desecration of religious items by touching them.

In Davis v. Pierce, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25030 (SD TX, Feb. 27, 2014), a Texas federal magistrate judge rejected Native American inmates' challenges to the ban on inmates smoking the ceremonial pipe, infrequent Native American religious services, the grooming policy and the ban on medicine bags outside of cells.

In Hodges v. Sharon, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25453 (ED CA, Feb. 26, 2014), a California federal magistrate judge permitted a Messianic Jewish inmate to proceed with his free exercise, RLUIPA and equal protection claims alleging denial of various religious practices, including weekly services and holiday celebrations.

In Godbey v. Wilson, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25436 (ED VA, Feb. 26, 2014), a Virginia federal district court dismissed complaints by an inmate who is an Asatru adherent that he is not allowed to drink alcoholic mead during religious ceremonies or wear his hlath (headband with symbols on it) outside the prison chapel.

In Begnoche v. Derose, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25580 (MD PA, Feb. 28, 2014), a Pennsylvania federal district court refused to dismiss a Native American inmate's free exercise claims against 3 defendants alleging that they failed to provide him with a spiritual advisor, denied him religious items such as prayer feathers and denied him a special food tray during the Green Corn feast celebration.

In Free v. Garcia, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25128 (WD OK, Feb. 27, 2014), an Oklahoma federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendations (2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26100, Feb. 14, 2014) and dismissed claims (some with and some without prejudice) that an inmate who is a House of Yahweh adherent did not receive his requested religious meals. A motion to amend the complaint was referred back to the magistrate judge.

State Agency May Bar Employee From Selling His Religious Book During Work Time

In Okemgbo v. Washington State Department of Ecology, (ED WA, Feb. 24, 2014), a Washington federal district court upheld against a First Amendment challenge a state agency's imposing on one of its employees who had authored a book on Christianity and marriage the following work restrictions:

You are not to use your work time for any non-work activity including:

• Promoting and soliciting contributions of money, time or other donations for your non-profit organization or other non-work related activities that you are involved in

• Promoting, selling and/or distributing your book on marriage

• Promoting religious opinions, providing religious information, counseling, offers to pray.

The court concluded that: "the Department’s interest in maintaining a workplace that is free of sexual harassment, does not promote a particular religion, and which maintains some semblance of order and efficiency outweighs the Plaintiff’s interest in selling his book, promoting his religious beliefs, or running his nonprofit organization, while he is supposed to be working."

In Mexican Village, Utility Shut-Off Used To Force Protestant Families To Contribute To Local Catholic Festivals

According to a press release issued last week by Christian Solidarity Worldwide USA, in the Mexican village of Unión Juárez (in Chiapas state) 25 Protestant families who belong to the Mount Tabor Evangelical Church have had their water and electricity cut off for refusing to contribute financially to Traditionalist Catholic religious festivals in the village. The actions against the families began Feb. 11.  Guards, ropes and chains have been placed around the families' homes to prevent them from reconnecting their services or receiving visitors until they pay 500 pesos (approximately $38) each. Village authorities base their demands on the Law of Uses and Customs which gives indigenous populations autonomy to exercise traditional governance forms. The families have filed a complaint with the National Commission for Human Rights.

Muslim County Worker Wins $1.2 Million In Employment Discrimination Suit

The Detroit Free Press reports that after a two-week employment discrimination trial, a federal court jury in Michigan on Thursday awarded nearly $1.2 million to Ypsilanti (MI) resident Ali Aboubaker, a Muslim.  Plaintiff, a U.S. citizen originally from Tunisia who holds four advanced degrees, claims that his firing from his maintenance engineer job with Washtenaw County was based on ethnic, religious and racial discrimination.  Aboubaker, who worked for the county for 17 years, says he was constantly subjected to racial and ethnic taunts-- especially focusing on his long beard-- and management did nothing about it. His suit also challenged a promotion he did not receive.

State Department's Human Rights Report Includes International Religious Discrimination Concerns

Last Thursday, Secretary of State John Kerry released the U.S. State Department's Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2013. While the report leaves the assessment of religious liberty around the world to the State Department's annual International Religious Freedom Report, Thursday's Human Rights report covers religious discrimination concerns for each country. The report's Introduction summarized these concerns:

Religious and ethnic minorities continued to face extreme restrictions and were targets of repression by governments and subject to societal discrimination across the globe.  In China, the government continued to implement repressive policies against ethnic Uighurs and Tibetans. 

In Pakistan, religious minorities faced a specter of growing violence during the year, including a deadly September church bombing in Peshawar that claimed more than 80 lives and three other incidents that killed at least 244 Shia Muslims. Religious minorities also faced discriminatory laws, societal intolerance, and a lack of accountability for crimes against them. 

In Iran, the government continued its egregious repression of Baha’i whose seven leaders remained in prison as did Christian pastor Saeed Abedini at year’s end. Attacks against Christians and Shia Muslims continued in Egypt as did attacks against Christians, Yezidis, Sabean Mandaeans, and other religious minorities in Iraq, often with a lack of accountability for the perpetrators. Ahmadi Muslims continued to face violence and repression in places such as Indonesia, as well as disenfranchisement in places such as Pakistan. 

Anti-Semitism also remained a significant problem in 2013. According to a survey of eight European member states by the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights, harassment of Jews continued, with one-quarter of respondents stating they experienced some form of anti-Semitic harassment in the 12 months before the survey. In the Middle East, media occasionally contained anti-Semitic articles and cartoons, some of which glorified or denied the Holocaust and blamed all Jews for actions by the state of Israel. 

Threats to religious practice also emerged during the year. For example, the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe passed a non-binding resolution implying that religious male circumcision – as practiced by Jews and Muslims, and other religions – is a human rights violation.

Ukrainian Religious Organizations Impacted By Russian Actions

Not surprisingly, the rapidly developing conflict between Ukraine and Russia is impacting Ukraine's religious institutions.  The Orthodox Church-- the dominant religion in Ukraine-- is split between three factions. These are the pro- Russian Ukrainian Orthodox Church (Moscow Patriarchate); the Ukrainian Orthodox Church (Kiev Patriarchate) which dominates Kiev and the central region of the country; and the Ukrainian Autocephalous Orthodox Church whose membership is mainly in the western half of Ukraine. According to The Economnist, this past Monday Moscow moved to assure its control over the Ukrainian Church that is part of the Moscow Patriarchate:

On Monday, the ruling synod of the UOC met and named a "locum tenens" to run the institution's headquarters in Kiev because of the incapacity of its elderly leader, Metropolitan Volodymyr.... The synod said it had ascertained that Metropolitan Volodymyr was definitely too ill to carry out his duties. The new acting leader, a certain Metropolitan Onufry from the southwest of Ukraine, certainly looks, from his biography, like a man who will remain in step with Moscow....

However the synod also accepted a proposal from the Kiev Patriarchate for dialogue.  Some think this is an attempt to continue to be a player should the Ukrainian government move toward creating a single national church.

Meanwhile, as reported by RIA Novosti, on Wednesday in the northern Ukrainian city of Sumy, a dozen backers of the Kiev Patriarchate attempted to seize a UOC-MP cathedral and threatened to set it on fire.  Other religious groups are also responding.  Yesterday's Catholic Sun reports that the Catholic bishop whose diocese includes Crimea issued a statement calling for "all believers and nonbelievers to refrain from extremism, and not to allow the fraternal bond between people living in Crimea to break."

New York Jewish Week this week reports on the uncertain situation of the Jewish community in Ukraine. There have been a few anti-Semitic incidents, including the fire bombing of a synagogue.  Several outside agencies are providing aid, including funds for increased security, for the Jewish community.

Islamist Syrian Rebel Group Imposes Strict Controls On Christians In Town of Raqqa

BBC News reported yesterday that in the northern Syrian town of Raqqa, the rebel group Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (ISIS) that controls the city has announced online that it is imposing new controls on Christians there. Christians must pay a special tax of 14 grams of gold, may not carry arms, may not renovate their churches, display crosses or other religious symbols outside churches, ring church bells, or pray in public. The group said that Christians must either convert to Islam or accept these conditions or else risk being killed. ISIS said 20 Christian leaders have accepted the conditions. Rival rebel groups have been fighting ISIS since last month.

$525M Default Judgment Entered Against Affiliate of Evangelist Tony Alamo

AP reports that an Arkansas trial court yesterday issued a $525 million default judgment against Twenty First Century Holiness Tabernacle Church-- an affiliate of Alamo Ministries.  The judgment came in a suit by 7 women who as young girls were physically, sexually and psychologically abused by evangelist Tony Alamo.  Alamo is presently serving a 175-year prison sentence for taking girls across state lines for sex. (See prior posting.) This week's default judgment gave each victim both actual and punitive damages in amounts totaling between $30 and $87 million per victim. Plaintiffs' attorney plans to register the judgment in California and begin levying on property there to satisfy the judgment.

Court Issues Final Order On Recognition of Out-of-State Same-Sex Marriages In Kentucky; Intervenors Pursuing Additional Relief

As previously reported, earlier this month a Kentucky federal district court issued an opinion holding unconstitutional Kentucky provisions that deny recognition to same-sex marriages performed in other jurisdictions. As reported by the Louisville Courier Journal and Insider Louisville, after a hearing on Tuesday, the court issued its final order (full text) implementing the decision (Bourke v. Beshear,  (WD KY, Feb. 27, 2014)). At the hearing, the deputy attorney general told the court that he did not have authority at that time to ask for a stay of the decision, and the court's final order thus did not contain a stay pending appeal. However the state subsequently quickly filed a motion (full text) asking for a 90-day stay to "give Defendants time to determine if they will appeal the order, and the Executive Branch time to determine what actions must be taken to implement this Court’s Order if no appeal is taken."

Meanwhile, the court yesterday also allowed (full text of order) two other couples to intervene in the case to pursue their claims (full text of intervenors' complaint) that Kentucky laws banning the issuance of marriage licenses to same-sex couples are also unconstitutional. [Thanks to Tom Rutledge for the lead.]

Veterans' Memorial Design Featuring Cross Held Unconstitutional

Following on a preliminary injunction issued last July (see prior posting), this week after a bench trial a California federal district court in American Humanist Association v. City of Lake Elsinore, (CD CA, Feb. 24, 2014), held that a veterans'-memorial design approved by the Lake Elsinore (CA) City Council violates the U.S. Constitution's Establishment Clause and the California constitution's Establishment and No Preference Clauses. The memorial includes a soldier kneeling with his gun in front of a 1.4 foot cross, and a row of approximately eight additional crosses and two Stars of David behind the central cross. The court, after tracing in detail the history of the design and redesign of the proposed monument concluded that the city had not shown a predominately secular purpose for including the Latin cross in the design, and its principal effect is to advance religion.  The city's contention that the multiple crosses and stars of David added in a redesign of the monument had the secular purpose of depicting a historic European World War II military cemetery was described by the court as "only a litigating position." American Humanist Association issued a press release calling attention to the decision.

Virginia Legislature Passes Student Religious Expression Bill; Veto Expected

As reported by Metro Weekly, yesterday the Virginia General Assembly gave final passage to SB 236 which protects student religious expression in public schools. The vote was 20-18 in the Senate and 64-34 in the House of Delegates.  The bill would protect voluntary student prayer and prayer gatherings before, during and after school; wearing of clothing or jewelry displaying religious messages; and expression of religious viewpoints by neutrally selected student speakers at graduation and similar events. As reported in Tuesday's Roanoke Times, Gov. Terry McAuliffe's office has said that the governor will veto the bill out of concern for its constitutionality and its unintended consequences.

UPDATE: The Washington Post reports, as expected, that Gov. McAuliffe vetoed the bill on April 4.  [Thanks to Scott Mange for the lead.]

9th Circuit: Court Should Order Removal of "Innocence of Muslims" From YouTube

In Garcia v. Google, Inc., (9th Cir., Feb. 26, 2014), the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, in a 2-1 decision, held that a preliminary injunction should be granted to require the controversial film "Innocence of Muslims" to be removed from YouTube. The suit was filed by Cindy Lee Garcia who acted in a portion of the film.  As explained by the court:

The film’s writer and producer ...cast Garcia in a minor role [in a film with the working title "Desert Warrior."] Garcia was ... paid approximately $500 for three and a half days of filming. “Desert Warrior” never materialized. Instead, Garcia’s scene was used in an anti-Islamic film titled “Innocence of Muslims.” Garcia first saw “Innocence of Muslims” after it was uploaded to YouTube.com and she discovered that her brief performance had been partially dubbed over so that she appeared to be asking, “Is your Mohammed a child molester?”

These, of course, are fighting words to many faithful Muslims and, after the film aired on Egyptian television, there were protests that generated worldwide news coverage.  An Egyptian cleric issued a fatwa, calling for the killing of everyone involved with the film, and Garcia soon began receiving death threats. She responded by taking a number of security precautions and asking that Google remove the video from YouTube.

As summarized by the court:

The panel concluded that the plaintiff established a likelihood of success on the merits of her claim of [copyright] infringement of her performance within the film because she proved that she likely had an independent interest in the performance and that the filmmaker did not own an interest as a work for hire and exceeded any implied license to use the plaintiff’s performance.

Volokh Conspiracy has an extensive analysis of the decision. (See prior related posting.)

UPDATE: On Feb. 28, the 9th Circuit issued a revised preliminary injunction (full text) making it clear that the injunction "does not preclude the posting or display of any version of “Innocence of Muslims” that does not include Cindy Lee Garcia’s performance." [Thanks to Volokh Conspiracy for the lead.]

Arizona Governor Vetoes Anti-Gay Religious Freedom Bill

As reported by the Arizona Daily Star, yesterday Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer vetoed H.B. 1062, the controversial amendments to the state's Religious Freedom Restoration Act that would, among other things, have allowed businesses to invoke religious freedom claims to refuse to serve gays and lesbians, particularly in the context of same-sex marriages. (See prior posting.) Announcing her decision at a news conference (full text of remarks), Brewer said that the bill is unneeded and "could divide Arizona in ways we cannot even imagine and no one would ever want." In her formal Veto Letter (full text), Brewer said in part:

Senate Bill 1062 ... does not seek to address a specific and present concern related to Arizona businesses.  The out-of-state examples cited by proponents of the bill, while concerning, are issues not currently existing in Arizona.  Furthermore, the bill is broadly worded and could result in unintended and negative consequences.  The legislation seeks to protect businesses, yet the business community overwhelmingly opposes the proposed law.  Moreover, some legislators that voted for the bill have reconsidered their votes and now do not want this legislation to become law.

Federal District Court Strikes Down Texas Ban On Same-Sex Marriage

Yesterday in De Leon v. Perry, (WD TX, Feb. 26, 2014), a Texas federal district court held unconstitutional Texas' statutory and constitutional bans on same-sex marriages and their prohibition on recognizing same-sex marriages performed elsewhere. Granting a preliminary injunction, the court said:

[T]oday's Court decision is not made in defiance of the great people of Texas or the Texas Legislature, but in compliance with the United States Constitution and Supreme Court precedent. Without a rational relation to a legitimate governmental purpose, state-imposed inequality can find no refuge in our United States Constitution. Furthermore, Supreme Court precedent prohibits states from passing legislation born out of animosity against homosexuals (Romer), has extended constitutional protection to the moral and sexual choices of homosexuals (Lawrence), and prohibits the federal government from treating state-sanctioned opposite-sex marriages and same-sex marriages differently (Windsor).

Applying the United States Constitution and the legal principles binding on this Court by Supreme Court precedent, the Court finds that Article I, Section 32 of the Texas Constitution and corresponding provisions of the Texas Family Code are unconstitutional. These Texas laws deny Plaintiffs access to the institution of marriage and its numerous rights, privileges, and responsibilities for the sole reason that Plaintiffs wish to be married to a person of the same sex. The Court finds this denial violates Plaintiffs' equal protection and due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

The court however stayed the execution of the preliminary injunction pending final disposition of any appeal to the 5th Circuit. According to the Dallas Morning News , state attorney general Greg Abbott says the state will appeal.  Washington Post places the decision in a broader context. Texas Gov. Rick Perry yesterday issued a statement (full text) reacting to the decision, saying in part:

it is not the role of the federal government to overturn the will of our citizens. The 10th Amendment guarantees Texas voters the freedom to make these decisions, and this is yet another attempt to achieve via the courts what couldn't be achieved at the ballot box.

Protester At Center of SCOTUS Decision On Military Base Protests Was Catholic Worker Movement Adherent

Yesterday the U.S. Supreme Court in United States v. Apel, (US Sup. Ct., Feb. 26, 2014), held that a federal statute which makes it a crime to re-enter a military installation after the base commander orders a person not to do so applies to a protest area at Vandenberg Air Force Base that is open to the public.  The Court describes John Dennis Apel, the protester involved in the case, as an antiwar activist. It says nothing about the religious basis for Apel's protests found in his involvement in the Catholic Worker Movement. Here is some insight into Apel's religious beliefs from a Dec. 2013 article reprinted on the Pacific Life Community's website:

[Apel] and a dedicated core of volunteers — including his wife of 15 years, Tensie — provide food and clothes to the community’s poor. They run a summer children’s program and a weekly free medical clinic.

The couple are devotees of the Catholic Worker movement, a social reform cause committed to social justice, pacifism and voluntary poverty that they’ve dedicated most of their adult lives to promoting.

They receive no salary — the couple and their two young children survive on his Social Security income, as well as donations and the charity of others.

For more than a dozen years, as part of Mr. Apel’s deep peace-oriented belief system, he has regularly stood outside the gates of Vandenberg, protesting what he believes is an immoral military mission. He has been arrested 15 times, and received “ban and bar” citations that restrict his ability to protest near the classified military installation.

New Ukraine Acting President Turchynov Is Baptist Pastor

Christianity Today reports that Ukraine's new Acting President who took office on Sunday is not only a well-respected opposition politician, but is also a Baptist pastor. BBC reports that the interim President, Olexander Turchynov, was the top aide to former prime minister Yulia Tymoshenko (who was imprisoned by the now ousted President Viktor Yanukovych). Turchynov preaches regularly at one of the Baptist churches in Kiev. In an article today, Religion News Service speculates:

Acting President Oleksandr Turchynov is neither Ukrainian Orthodox nor Eastern Rite Catholic, and that may be the key to his success at a time when fissures between East and West are threatening to split the country, 

Missouri County Treasurer Will Accept Same-Sex Marriages From Other States In Unclaimed Property Claims

According to Monday's Columbia Daily Tribune, in Boone County, Missouri (which includes Columbia) County Treasurer Nicole Galloway has announced she will recognized same-sex marriages from out of state. This means that after the death of a spouse, a surviving same-sex spouse can obtain unclaimed property of the deceased being held by the county. The county treasurer took the step despite the provision in Sec. 33 of the Missouri Constitution that provides: "That to be valid and recognized in this state, a marriage shall exist only between a man and a woman." Galloway said: "In Boone County and in my office, we accept legal documents from every state in America, and this is just an extension of that." [Thanks to Alliance Alert for the lead.]

Lesbian Employee Forced To Watch Religious Anti-Gay Video Loses Claim For Harassment

As reported by the Santa Rosa Press Democrat, a Sonoma County, California trial court yesterday issued a tentative decision (full text) in White v. GC Micro Corp., (Cal. Super. Ct., Feb. 25, 2014).  Plaintiff in the case, a lesbian in a committed domestic partnership, was recruited by GC Micro's CEO to move from Colorado to California to work for the company. She was fired after 5 months.  The supervisor in charge of training sales staff made derogatory remarks about plaintiff's sexual orientation and lifestyle, and required her to watch a video featuring a minister who had "outspoken disdain for homosexuality" and believed "that all homosexuals are sinners." However, according to the court, plaintiff "does not allege that the video contained any inappropriate material." The court allowed plaintiff to move ahead with a sexual orientation discrimination claim and a fraud claim against the company, but dismissed with leave to amend the claims against the CEO and supervisor personally. The court dismissed completely plaintiff's claim for harassment.

Suit Challenges World War I Memorial Cross

A humanist organization and three individuals yesterday filed suit challenging the constitutionality of a 40-foot tall cross erected nearly 90 years ago as a memorial to those killed in World War I.  The cross is located on a median between roadways in Bladensburg, Maryland.  The complaint (full text) in American Humanist Association v. Maryland- National Capital Park and Planning Commission, (D MD, filed 2/25/2014) contends that the county's:

ownership, maintenance and prominent display on public property of the Bladensburg Cross amounts to the endorsement and advancement of religion (and, specifically, an endorsement of and affiliation with Christianity) in violation of the Establishment Clause.

American Humanist Association issued a press release announcing the filing of the lawsuit.

Universities In Crossfire Over Bibles In Hotel Rooms

Two state universities find themselves in the cross fire of rival advocacy groups over the issue of Gideon Bibles in the night stands at university hotels and conference centers.  The Blaze reported yesterday that after complaints by the Freedom from Religion Foundation, Iowa State University's Hotel Memorial Union agreed to remove bibles from in-room night stands and place them instead in its downstairs library and reading room. The University of Wisconsin-Extension also agreed to remove bibles from guest rooms in its conference center. Now however Alliance Defending Freedom has told both universities that the 1st Amendment does not require them to remove the Bibles, and doing so amounts to viewpoint discrimination.

Greek Jews Sue Germany In European Court For Return of Ransom Paid To Nazis

AP reports that the Jewish community of Thessaloniki, Greece last week filed an appeal with the European Court of Human Rights in a suit against Germany seeking to recover the $69 million in ransom paid in 1942 to Nazi occupiers for the release of thousands of Jewish men aged 18-45 who were forced as slave laborers to work on construction projects across Greece. Soon after their release, the city's entire Jewish population was sent to German death camps anyway. Greece's Supreme Court dismissed the lawsuit last year on jurisdictional grounds.

Obama Criticizes Uganda President's Signing of Anti-Gay Law

As he said he would, yesterday Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni signed into law a harsh Anti-Homosexuality bill. CNN reports that at the public signing of the bill, Museveni said he would not allow the West to impose its values on Uganda.  In response, the White House issued a statement (full text) reading in part:

Instead of standing on the side of freedom, justice, and equal rights for its people, today, regrettably, Ugandan President Museveni took Uganda a step backward by signing into law legislation criminalizing homosexuality.  As President Obama has said, this law is more than an affront and a danger to the gay community in Uganda, it reflects poorly on the country's commitment to protecting the human rights of its people and will undermine public health, including efforts to fight HIV/AIDS.... 

Court Rules That Illinois Same Sex Couples Can Wed Immediately In Cook County

In Lee v. Orr, (ND IL, Feb. 21, 2014), an Illinois federal district court, in a 4-page opinion, held that Illinois statutes barring same-sex marriages violate the 14th Amendment's equal protection clause by discriminating on the basis of sexual orientation.  Illinois has already enacted a law allowing same-sex marriages, but that law does not take effect until June 1. (See prior posting.) In this decision, however, the court ruled that same-sex couples need not wait for June:

There is no reason to delay further when no opposition has been presented to this Court and committed gay and lesbian couples have already suffered from the denial of their fundamental right to marry.

However because the suit was filed only against the Cook County Clerk, the court's decision applies only to marriage licenses issued by Cook County. The Chicago Tribune reports that same-sex couples began lining up for marriage licenses within an hour after the ruling was issued.

Temporary Injunction Issued Stopping North Carolina School Voucher Program

According to the Lincoln (NC) Times-News, after a hearing last Friday, a North Carolina trial court judge issued a temporary injunction barring the state (at least for the time being) from moving ahead with a lottery to choose families to receive school vouchers for use at private schools next year. The state has received over 4,700 applications for the 2,400 vouchers that would be awarded to income-eligible families. According to the Times-News report:

Friday’s arguments focused on what the state constitution allows and whether the legislature improperly took money away from the state’s public schools to give to private schools. Opponents of the bill have argued that vouchers would send money to schools that discriminate based on religion or disability. 

One school that has come under fire is Raleigh Christian Academy, which requires its students and parents to sign a contract stating they are in 100 percent agreement with its fundamental doctrinal practices. Their school application states, “we are not a church school for those in cults, i.e. Mormons, Jehovah’s Witness, Christian Science, Unification Church, Zen Buddhism, Unitarianism, and United Pentecostal.”

(See prior related posting.)

Missouri Catholic Diocese Settles Two Abuse Lawsuits

Last week, the Catholic Diocese of Kansas City-St. Joseph settled two separate state court lawsuits stemming from the child pornography activities of priest Shawn Ratigan.  AP reports that last Friday a court approved a settlement of $1.275 million in a suit brought by parents whose daughter was photographed in nude and semi-nude poses by Ratigan when the girl was 10 to 12 years old. A $525,000 settlement in a second suit was approved last Wednesday in a suit involving a girl who was photographed by Ratigan when the girl was 9 years old. In each of the suits, thejudge also entered a $500,000 default judgment against Ratigan who was sentenced to 50 years in prison last year. In 2012 Bishop Robert Finn was convicted of a misdemeanor for failing to authorities his suspicion of child abuse by Ratigan.  Finn was sentenced to two years probation. (See prior posting.)

Arizona Legislature Passes RFRA Amendments To Allow Businesses To Refuse To Serve Gays On Religious Grounds

The Arizona legislature on Thursday passed and sent to the governor SB 1062 which amends the state's Religious Freedom Restoration Act to extend its coverage to the exercise of religion by corporations and other business organizations. The bill also provides that its protections may be asserted in lawsuits even if the government is not a party. (Background form Arizona Center for Policy.) The controversial bill is designed to permit businesses that oppose homosexuality or same-sex marriage on religious grounds to refuse to provide goods or services if it violates their religious beliefs. ABC News reports that Gov. Jan Brewer is still deciding whether or not to sign the bill. Some suggest that if the controversial bill becomes law, it could lead to boycotts in connection with the Super Bowl scheduled for Arizona next year. AP reports further on the legislation.

Professor Loses On Claim of Retaliation For Religious Speech Aimed At Students

In Payne v. University of South Mississippi, (SD MI, Feb. 21, 2014), a Mississippi federal district court held that the 1st Amendment does not preclude a faculty member at a public university being disciplined for religious speech made as part of his duties as a professor. According to the court:

A graduate student employed in a program administered by Plaintiff ... complained: “Sometimes during conversations with Dr. Payne, religion or Bible verses are usually brought up by him in some way. This makes me and others very uncomfortable. . . . While in Scotland with CJA staff, Dr. Payne made the statement that anyone who is not a Christian is going to hell.” She continued: “I have been told to go pray about certain issues when they are being discussed with Dr. Payne numerous times. . . . I do not feel comfortable when told to go pray from my supervisor instead of dealing with the situation.”

The court dismissed plaintiff's 1st Amendment retaliation claim.

Recent Articles of Interst

From SSRN:

• John D. Haskell, The Scandal of Disenchantment: Blind Spots in Modern Anglo-American Approaches to the History and Politics of International Law, (University of Memphis Law Review, Vol. 44, 2013).
• Oren Gross, Venerate, Amend...and Violate, (Arizona State Law Journal, Vol. 46, Forthcoming).
• James M. Oleske, Obamacare, RFRA, and the Perils of Legislative History, (67 Vanderbilt Law Review En Banc (2014 Forthcoming)).
• Stephen M. Bainbridge, A Critique of the Corporate Law Professors’ Amicus Brief in Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Wood, (UCLA School of Law, Law-Econ Research Paper No. 14-03, 2014).
• Daniel John Crooks, Toward 'Liberty': How the Marriage of Substantive Due Process and Equal Protection in Lawrence and Windsor Sets the Stage for the Inevitable Loving of Our Time, (8 Charleston L. Rev. 223 (2014)).
• Dorit Rubinstein Reiss, Thou Shalt Not Take the Name of the Lord Thy God in Vain: Use and Abuse of Religious Exemptions from School Immunization Requirements, (Hastings Law Journal, Vol. 65, No. 6, 2014).
• Brian Leiter, Preface to the Paperback Edition of Why Tolerate Religion?, (Why Tolerate Religion? (Princeton University Press, cloth edition, 2013; 2014 Forthcoming)).
• Michael J. Perry, Adjudicating Rights-Based Constitutional Claims: The Morality of Human Rights and the Power of Judicial Review, (Emory Legal Studies Research Paper No. 14-271 (2014)).

From SSRN (Establishment Clause issues):

• Alan E. Brownstein, Town of Greece v. Galloway: Constitutional Challenges to State Sponsored Prayers at Local Government Meetings, (47 UC Davis Law Review, (2014 Forthcoming)).
• Edward A. Zelinsky, The First Amendment and the Parsonage Allowance, (Tax Notes, Vol. 142, No. 4, Jan. 27, 2014).
• Carolyn Homer Thomas, The Copyright Act's Licensing Exemption for Religious Performances of Religious Works Is Unconstitutional, (DePaul Law Review, Vol. 63, No. 1, p. 49, 2013).
• Haley Palfreyman Jankowski, Neutrality Fatality as between Government Speech and Religion and Nonreligion: How the Government Speech Doctrine Provides a Solution, (Brigham Young University Law Review 363, 2013).

From SSRN (Non-U.S. Law):

• Dmitry Uzlaner, The Pussy Riot Case and the Peculiarities of Russian Post-Secularism, (State, Religion and Church. 2014. 1(1): 23-58).
• Rajeev Bhargava, State and Religious Diversity: Can Something Be Learnt from the Indian Model of Secularism?, (Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Research Paper No. PP 2014/03 (Feb. 2014)).
• Sorin Alexandru Vernea, Engagement Prior to Marriage – A Short Walk Through the History of Romanian Law, (Social Economic Debates, December 2013, Vol. 2, No. 2). 
• Kerstin Steiner, The Case Continues? The High Courts in Malaysia and Unilateral Conversion of a Child to Islam by One Parent, (Australian Journal of Asian Law, Vol. 14, No. 2, Article 10, 2013).
• M.B. Hooker, Essay: Maria Was a Christian - Nadra Was a Muslim: Hertogh Revisited, (Australian Journal of Asian Law, Vol. 14, No. 2, Article 8, 2013).
• Uladzislau Belavusau, Hate Speech and Constitutional Democracy in Eastern Europe: Transitional and Militant? (Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland), (Israel Law Review, Vol. 47, Issue 1. pp. 27-61 (2014)).

SCOTUS Blog Contraceptive Mandate Symposium (Feb. 17-24, 2014):

• Marty Lederman, Symposium: How to understand Hobby Lobby.
• Jessie Hill, Symposium: The Contraceptives Coverage Controversy-- What's Old Is New Again.
• John Bursch, Symposium: Hobby Lobby and Conestoga: The Most Difficult-to-Answer Question.
• Michael Dorf, Symposium: Why is RFRA Still Valid Against the Federal Government?
• Douglas Laycock, Symposium: Congress Answered This Question: Corporations Are Covered.
• Ira Lupu and Robert Tuttle, Symposium: Religious Questions and Saving Constructions.

From SmartCILP:

• Daniel P. Dalton, The Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act--Recent Decisions and Developments, 45 Urban Lawyer 741-767 (2013).
• Robert W. Kerns Jr., Protecting the Faithful From Their Faith: A Proposal for Snake-Handling Law in West Virginia, [Abstract], 116 West Virginia Law Review 561-581 (2013).
• Monica Youn, Proposition 8 and the Mormon Church: A Case Study in Donor Disclosure, 81 George Washington Law Revies 2108-2154 (2013). 
• Mee-Yin Mary Yuen, Human Rights in China: Examining the Human Rights Values in Chinese Confucian Ethics and Roman Catholic Social Teachings, 8 Intercultural Human Rights Law Review 281-321 (2013).

Recent Prisoner Free Exercise Cases

In Howard v. Connett, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19231 (D NV, Feb. 14, 2014), a Nevada federal district court refused to grant summary judgment to defendants on an inmate's claims that Nation of Islam services are held only once monthly and he is not released regularly for other Muslim services[ on his claim that he was deprived of his Qur'an for 12 days while in disciplinary segregation; and on his claim of a conspiracy to deprive him of medical treatment based on animus toward his religion.

In Hoeck v. Miklich, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20381 (D CO, Feb. 19, 2014), a Colorado federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendations in part and allowed an inmate to proceed with his claims against certain defendants complaining that the practices of his "Biblical Christian" faith were not accommodated.

In Karsjens v. Jesson, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20911 (D MN, Feb. 19, 2014), a Minnesota federal district court allowed plaintiffs to proceed with their claim that portions of the Minnesota civil commitment sex offender program violate their free exercise rights.  Plaintiffs claim they are monitored during religious services and private meetings with clergy, are not allowed to wear religious apparel or have certain religious property, are not allowed communal religious feasts and cannot receive Kosher or Halal meals.

In Rahman v. Fischer, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20846 (ND NY, Feb. 20, 2014), a New York federal district court adopted a  magistrate's recommendation and dismissed a number of claims but permitted a Muslim inmate to proceed with his complaint that he was denied access to the sink to make ablution.

In Pelayo v. Hernandez, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20616 (ND CA, Feb. 18, 2014), a California federal district court dismissed with leave to amend an inmate's complaint that he was prevented from entering the dining hall at breakfast because he was carrying a pocket Bible and thin Bible folder.

In Walker v. Artus, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21745 (ND NY, Feb. 21, 2014), a New York federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendations and dismissed a complaint that Muslim inmates in the special housing unit are not allowed to attend congregate religious services, nor are they allowed to watch or listen through closed circuit transmissions.

7th Circuit Affirms Denial of Preliminary Injunction to Notre Dame In Contraceptive Coverage Challenge

In University of Notre Dame v. Sebelius, (7th Cir., Feb. 21, 2014), the U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals on Friday, in a 2-1 decision, denied a preliminary injunction to Notre Dame University in its challenge to the Affordable Care Act contraceptive coverage mandate as applied to religious non-profits. Handing down its decision only 9 days after hearing oral arguments, the majority in an opinion by Judge Posner affirmed the district court, saying in part:

We imagine that what the university wants is an order forbidding Aetna and Meritain to provide any contraceptive coverage to Notre Dame staff or students pending final judgment in the district court.  But we can’t issue such an order; neither Aetna nor Meritain is a defendant (the university’s failure to join them as defendants puzzles us)..... Furthermore, while a religious institution has a broad immunity from being required to engage in acts that violate the tenets of its faith, it has no right to prevent other institutions, whether the government or a health insurance  company, from  engaging in acts that merely offend the institution..

If the government is entitled to require that female contraceptives be provided to women free of charge, we have trouble understanding how  signing the form that declares Notre Dame’s authorized refusal to pay for  contraceptives for its students or staff, and mailing the authorization document to those companies, which under federal law are obligated to pick up the tab, could be thought to “trigger” the provision of female contraceptives....

The novelty of Notre Dame’s claim—not for the exemption, which it has, but for the right to have it without having to ask for it—deserves emphasis. United States law and public policy have a history of accommodating religious beliefs....  What makes this case and others like it involving the contraception exemption paradoxical and virtually unprecedented is that the beneficiaries of the religious exemption are claiming that the exemption process itself imposes a substantial burden on their religious faiths. The closest  analogues we have found  are  cases in which  churches seeking rezoning or variances claim that the process for obtaining permission is so cumbersome as to constitute a substantial burden on religious practice....  

The process of claiming one’s exemption from the duty to provide contraceptive  coverage is the opposite of cumbersome. It  amounts  to signing  one’s  name  and  mailing  the signed form to two addresses. Notre Dame may consider the process a  substantial burden, but substantiality—like  compelling  governmental  interest—is  for  the court  to  decide.

The majority also rejected Notre Dame's establishment clause challenge, and left its free speech challenge for further development in the district court.

Judge Flaum dissenting said in part:

Having to submit the EBSA Form 700, Notre Dame maintains, makes it “complicit in a grave moral wrong” by involving it with a system that delivers contraceptive products and services to its employees and students.

The majority has trouble accepting this position, in part due  to  the  university’s  statement  that  its  signature  will “trigger”  contraceptive  coverage, because the majority understands federal law to require contraceptive coverage regardless of what Notre Dame signs or does not sign.... Yet we are judges, not moral philosophers or theologians; this is not a question of legal causation but of religious faith. Notre Dame tells us that Catholic doctrine prohibits the action that the government requires it to take. So long as that belief is sincerely held, I believe we should defer to Notre Dame’s understanding.

Wall Street Journal reports on the decision.

Oregon Will Not Defend Its Same-Sex Marriage Ban In Pending Litigation

In its answer filed yesterday in Geiger v. Kitzhaber, a suit challenging Oregon's same-sex marriage ban, Oregon officials notified the federal district court:

State Defendants will not defend the Oregon ban on same-sex marriage in this litigation. Rather, they will take the position in their summary judgment briefing that the ban cannot withstand a federal constitutional challenge under any standard of review. In the meantime, as the State Defendants are legally obligated to enforce the Oregon Constitution’s ban on same-sex marriage, they will continue to do so unless and until this Court grants the relief sought by the plaintiffs.

The lawsuit was filed last October. (See prior posting.) SCOTUSblog reports on Oregon's decision not to defend its ban.

UAE Fatwa Committee Says Mars Settlement Proposal Violates Islamic Law

Last year, a Dutch company, Mars One, announced plans to establish a permanent human colony on Mars.  Plans are for the first volunteers to fly there in 2023, with others following every two years.  No technology currently exists to bring the colonizers back to earth.  This week the Khaleej Times reports that a fatwa committee under the General Authority of Islamic Affairs and Endowment in the United Arab Emirates has ruled that promoting or participating in the one-way trips violates Islamic law:

 “Such a one-way journey poses a real risk to life, and that can never be justified in Islam,” the committee said.  “There is a possibility that an individual who travels to planet Mars may not be able to remain alive there, and is more vulnerable to death.”

Whoever opts for this “hazardous trip”, the committee said, is likely to perish for no “righteous reason”, and thus will be liable to a “punishment similar to that of suicide in the Hereafter”.

Some 500 Saudis and other Arabs are among those who have already applied to take part in the mission.

Court Dismisses Challenge To NYPD's Surveillance of Muslims

In Hassan v. City of New York, (D NJ, Feb. 20, 2014), a New Jersey federal district court dismissed a constitutional challenge to the New York City Police Department's surveillance of the Muslim community in New Jersey following 9/11. Plaintiffs claimed that the surveillance was motivated solely by animus against Muslims. The court concluded first that plaintiffs lack standing because they did not allege a sufficient injury from the surveillance. The alleged injury to reputations and to the religious functioning of various organizations was caused by the AP's unauthorized release of documents about the program, not by the NYPD's surveillance.  The court also concluded that plaintiffs failed to show intentional discrimination:

Plaintiffs in this case have not alleged facts from which it can be plausibly inferred that they were targeted solely because of their religion. The more likely explanation for the surveillance was a desire to locate budding terrorist conspiracies. The most obvious reason for so concluding is that surveillance of the Muslim community began just after the attacks of September 11, 2001.

The Center for Constitutional Rights issued a press release reacting to the decision. AP reports on the decision.

Los Angeles Archdiocese Settles Remaining Clergy Abuse Cases For $13 Million

As reported by KPCC News, earlier this week the Catholic Archdiocese of Los Angeles agreed to settle the 17 clergy abuse lawsuits remaining against it for a total of $13 million. Eleven of the suits involve charges relating to Mexican priest Nicolas Aguilar Rivera who molested at least 26 boys in his 10 months in Los Angeles and then fled before the Archdiocese notified police about complaints against him. Cardinal Roger Mahoney who headed the Archdiocese at the time of the molestations and is now retired was sanctioned last year by his successor after released files showed he was involved in shielding accused priests from law enforcement authorities. (See prior posting.) The KPPC article includes a link to Augilar Rivera's full personnel file.

North Korea Detains Christian Missionary For Distributing Gospel Tracts

London's The Telegraph reported yesterday that North Korea has detained a 75-year old Christian missionary for distributing Korean language gospel tracts that he had written. He could face up to 15 years in prison for his actions. The missionary, John Short, is an Australian who lives with his family in Hong Kong and is a member of The Gospel Hall brethren. This was his second trip to North Korea. Short's wife told the press: "We're faith missionaries and he believed that we should care and not just talk but do something… Ultimately, we're in God's hands and that's how we look at it."

India's Supreme Court Says Country's Adoption Law Applies To Muslims

In Hashmi v. Union of India, (Sup. Ct. India, Feb. 19, 2014), a 3-judge panel of the Supreme Court of India held that the Juvenile Justice (Care And Protection of Children) Act, 2000 (background), allows a parent of any religion to adopt an eligible child. The Court described the Juvenile Justice Act as a "small step" toward a uniform Civil Code envisioned by Art. 44 of the Indian Constitution. The Court rejected the argument of the All India Muslim Personal Law Board that Child Welfare Committees should follow the principles of Islamic law before declaring a Muslim child available for adoption. Islamic law recognizes the Kafala system under which a child in need remains a descendant of its biological parents even though it is placed under the care of others. Because of these differing views on adoption, however, the court refused to declare adoption a fundamental right under Art. 21 of the Indian Constitution. Calcutta's The Telegraph reports on the decision.

Faith Healing Parents Get 3 1/2 to 7 Years In Death of Child

In Philadelphia yesterday, Herbert and Catherine Schaible were sentenced to three and one-half to seven years in prison in the faith-healing death from pneumonia of their 8-month old son last year. The couple pleaded no-contest to third degree murder charges in the case. At the time of the death, the couple were already on 10-years probation for the similar death of another of their children for whom they failed to seek medical treatment. (See prior posting.) The couple belong to the First Century Gospel Church which teaches that illness is to be healed through prayer. AP reports that the prosecution had asked for sentences of 8 to 16 years:

“It was so foreseeable to me that this was going to happen,” said Assistant District Attorney Joanne Pescatore, who prosecuted both cases. “Everybody in the system failed these children.”

After the first death, she and public defender Mythri Jayaraman agreed that the couple’s beliefs were so ingrained that their children remained at risk. They asked the earlier judge to have the family supervised by a Department of Human Services caseworker. Instead, the judge assigned them to probation officers, who are not trained to monitor children’s welfare.

In sentencing the couple, Judge Benjamin Lerner told them: "You’ve killed two of your children. ... Not God. Not your church. Not religious devotion. You."

Group Homes Ordered Closed After Charges That Disabled Residents Were Punished For Refusing To Attend Religious Services

The Los Angeles Times reports that last Friday a California trial court judge appointed a receiver to begin relocating dozens of physically and mentally disabled residents from two unlicensed religiously-operated group homes. Husband and wife, Kang Won Lee and Jung Hwan Lee, operate the two Los Angeles facilities, Agape Mission House and Agape Home Church. Los Angeles authorities say living conditions in the homes were deplorable.  They also say that residents were forced to attend religious services twice a day, regardless of their religious beliefs.  If they refused, they were punished by being required to stand by a tree for up to 4 hours, translate Bible verses for a full day and sleep outside at night.

MLK Bible and Medal ordered Under Court Control While Litigation Is Pending

A Georgia state trial court has issued a preliminary ruling in the lawsuit between the children of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. over control of his Nobel Peace Prize and his famous "traveling" Bible.  Bernice King is seeking to prevent her two brothers (who control the King estate) from selling the two items over her dissenting vote.  The estate has sued to force Bernice (who currently controls the items) to turn them over. (See prior posting.) According to Reuters, yesterday the judge, saying there is a likelihood the estate will win its lawsuit, ordered the items moved to a single bank safe-deposit box with the judge controlling the keys to it.

Marijuana DUI Law Does Not Injure Religious User of Cannabis

In Baker v. State of Colorado, (D CO, Feb. 18, 2014), a Colorado federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendation (Feb. 7, 2014) and dismissed for lack of standing a free exercise challenge to Colorado's marijuana DUI statute. The magistrate's conclusion, adopted by the district court, was:

Plaintiff alleges that Colorado's marijuana DUI statute violates his First Amendment right to free exercise of religion because it infringes on his right to (1) personally use cannabis for medical and sacramental purposes and (2) run a church that uses cannabis in its religious practices.... Plaintiff does not allege facts indicating that his religion specifically necessitates marijuana use resulting in five ngs or more of Delta 9-THC in his bloodstream while driving a car. Therefore, Plaintiff fails to allege facts showing that Colorado's marijuana DUI statute has unconstitutionally burdened his religious practices.... Accordingly, he fails to allege an injury in fact in connection with his First Amendment claim.

Court Says Parents Who Lost Custody of Child Have Only Limited Control Over Child's Religious Exposure

In In re T.K, (OH Ct.. App., Feb. 19, 2014), an Ohio appeals court held that when legal custody of a child is given to the child's grandparents, there are limits on the extent to which the child's mother can dictate the boy's religious upbringing.  The boy was originally placed with the grandparents when he tested positive for marijuana at birth, and custody was made permanent 9 months later with the parents' consent.  However the boy's mother objected to the grandparents raising her son in their Catholic faith. An Ohio statute (RC 2151.353(A)(3)(c)) provides that when legal custody is transferred, parents retain the residual "privilege to determine the child's religious affiliation."

The court of appeals upheld the trial court's implementation of the mother's preference by an order providing that  "the grandparents not engage the child in church activities or rituals designed for ... membership, including those required for membership into the Catholic Church."  The mother had wanted a broader order prohibiting the grandparents from in any way, teaching, indoctrinating, or actively exposing the child to any religion, Catholic or otherwise. The court however focused on the statute's use of the term "affiliation" and agreed with the trial court that exposure to religion is not tantamount to affiliation.

Upcoming Conferences and Survey

Here are several items that may be of particular interest to law school faculty members, lawyers and policy makers:

The 5th annual Religious Legal Theory conference is being held this year at Emory University Law School on Feb. 24-25, hosted by its Center for the Study of Law and Religion. This year's theme is "A Global Conversation: Exploring Interfaith and International Models for the Interaction of Religion and State." More details are available at the Center's website.

On April 3-5, Harvard Law School is hosting a conference titled "Religious Accommodation in the Age of Civil Rights." The conference is co-sponsored by Harvard Law School, Williams Institute, ACLU, and USC Center for Law, History and Culture. More details are available online at Harvard Law School's website.

Prof. Faisal Kutty, with the endorsement of the AALS Section on Islamic Law, is conducting a survey on Teaching of Islamic Law In North American Law Schools. The online survey is available from this link.

Church of England Issues Pastoral Guidance on Same-Sex Marriage

In Britain last week, the House of Bishops of the Church of England issued Pastoral Guidance on Same Sex Marriage (full text) in response to Parliament's enactment of the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013. (See prior posting.) The Bishop's statement says in part [emphasis in original]:

12.  When the Act comes into force in March it will continue not to be legally possible for two persons of the same sex to marry according to the rites of the Church of England. In addition the Act makes clear that any rights and duties which currently exist in relation to being married in church of England churches do not extend to same sex couples....

18.  We recognise the many reasons why couples wish their relationships to have a formal status. These include the joys of exclusive commitment and also extend to the importance of legal recognition of the relationship. To that end, civil partnership continues to be available for same sex couples. Those same sex couples who choose to marry should be welcomed into the life of the worshipping community and not be subjected to questioning about their lifestyle. Neither they nor any children they care for should be denied access to the sacraments....

20.   The 2005 pastoral statement said that it would not be right to produce an authorized public liturgy in connection with the registering of civil partnerships and that clergy should not provide services of blessing for those who registered civil partnerships. The House did not wish, however,  to interfere with the clergy's pastoral discretion about when more informal kind of prayer, at the request of the couple, might be appropriate in the light of the circumstances....

21.  The same approach ,,, should therefore apply to couples who enter same-sex marriage, on the assumption that any prayer will be accompanied by pastoral discussion of the church's teaching and their reasons for departing from it. Services of blessing should not be provided. Clergy should respond pastorally and sensitively in other ways....

27.  The House is not, therefore, willing for those who are in a same sex marriage to be ordained to any of the three orders of ministry. In addition it considers that it would not be appropriate conduct for someone in holy orders to enter into a same sex marriage, given the need for clergy to model the Church's teaching in their lives.

Law & Religion UK blog has more on the Bishop's statement.

7th Circuit Oral Arguments In Challenge To Cross Display On Riverfront

Yesterday, the U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral arguments (audio of full arguments) in Cabral v. City of Evansville. In the case, an Indiana federal district court enjoined the city of Evansville from permitting Westside Christian Church and other religious organizations from erecting a planned display of  31 six-foot tall crosses on the city's 4-block Riverfront area. (See prior posting.) AP reports on yesterday's oral arguments.

Investigative Report Looks At Chabad Collections In Russia That Have Been Subject of Extensive US Litigation

The Forward today has a long and interesting report from Russia on the two expropriated collections of valuable Jewish religious books and manuscripts (the Schneerson Library and the Archive) that have been the subject of extensive litigation in the United States. The American Chabad organization, Agudas Chasidei Chabad, has obtained U.S. judgments ordering the collections returned to it in the United States. (See prior posting.) One of the collections, the Schneersohn Library, which was nationalized by the Bolsheviks after the 1917 Russian Revolution and has been in the Russian State Library in Moscow, is now being digitized and moved to Moscow's new Jewish Museum and Tolerance Center, a $50 million institution controlled by the Russian branch of Chabad. This implements a proposed compromise that Russian President Vladimir Putin previously suggested. Forward's investigative reporter visited the room at the Jewish Museum and Tolerance Center which is housing the collection as it is moved there, and reports on the ease of access to it. Boruch Gorin who heads the Jewish Museum favors this arrangement and sees the possibility that if it were accepted, eventually the other collection, the Archive, which consists of documents plundered by the Nazis and taken back by the Red Army in World War II, could be sent to the United States. He says that the uncompromising strategy of Chasidei Chabad threatens that possibility.

UN Commission Finds Severe Human Rights Abuses, Including Religious Persecution, In North Korea

The United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights announced yesterday the release of the report of a commission of inquiry on human rights abuses in North Korea. The 36-page report of the commission dated Feb. 7 (full text) says:

24. The commission finds that systematic, widespread and gross human rights violations have been and are being committed by the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea.  In many instances, the violations found entailed crimes against humanity based on State policies....

The report includes findings on religious persecution by North Korea:

31. The State considers the spread of Christianity a particularly serious threat, since it challenges ideologically the official personality cult and provides a platform for social and political organization and interaction outside the realm of the State. Apart from the few organized State-controlled churches, Christians are prohibited from practising their religion and are persecuted. People caught practising Christianity are subject to severe punishments in violation of the right to freedom of religion and the prohibition of religious discrimination.

The 36-page report is documented by 354 pages of detailed findings (full text). More background and reactions are reported by CBS News.

Challenges To North Carolina School Vouchers Clear First Hurdle

Yesterday, a North Carolina state trial court refused to dismiss on the pleadings two related lawsuits challenging the state's Opportunity Scholarship Program.  The program will provide school vouchers for use at private schools to some 2400 income eligible families. It was enacted as part of last year's state budget bill.  NC Policy Watch reports on yesterday's ruling from the bench that came after a hearing that lasted more than two hours. The lawsuits, Hart v. North Carolina, (NC Super. Ct., filed 1/13/2014) (full text of complaint) and Richardson v. North Carolina, (NC Super. Ct., filed 1/15/2014) (full text of complaint), claim that the law violates several state constitutional provisions on education, taxation and discrimination. The court scheduled a hearing for Friday on plaintiffs' request to delay implementation of the scholarship program while its constitutionality is being litigated. Institute for Justice has additional information on the lawsuits.

Snake-Handling Pastor Dies From Rattlesnake Bite

On Saturday night, a pastor who starred in the reality TV show Snake Salvation died of a snake bite.  According to USA Today, Rev. Jamie Coots, pastor of the Middlesboro, Kentucky,  snake handling Full Gospel Tabernacle in Jesus Name was bitten by a rattlesnake. An emergency crew came to the church, but Coots had been taken home. When the crew went to Coots's home, the pastor refused treatment. Unlike the 8 previous times Coots had been bitten, this time the bite proved fatal.  Last year, Coots was convicted by a Tennessee court of illegally possessing poisonous snakes. (See prior posting.)

Ugandan President Says He Will Sign Harsh Anti-Homosexuality Bill; U.S. Objects

The Kampala Observer and the New York Times reported yesterday that Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni says he will sign the harsh Anti-Homosexuality Bill (full text- apparently the final version) passed by Uganda's Parliament last December. (See prior posting.) The announcement came in closing remarks at a retreat of Museveni's political party, the National Resistance Movement (NRM). Originally Museveni had reservations about signing the bill, but in his remarks (full text) to the NRM Museveni explained his current decision:

The reason I had not signed the bill is to scientifically answer the question; are there people genetically born homosexual? For me, I had thought that since there were people born albino there could be people born homosexual.

But since the medical authorities, the department of genetics of the Medical School from Makerere, say there is no proof yet that people are homosexual by genetics, I told those scientists to put it in writing and they are going to do so. Then I will sign the bill.

Am taking all these precautions because am historically answerable for whatever I do as a leader. There were mistakes made in the 1930s by Hitler because he wanted to make Germany strong. Some of these issues are very crucial and should be handled objectively not emotionally....

I know we are going to have a big battle with outsiders, but I will be able to say I asked scientists and this is what they said. That homosexuals are normal people behaving abnormally.

In the United States, yesterday President Obama issued a statement (full text) saying that he is "deeply disappointed" by the decision. He added: "enacting this legislation will complicate our valued relationship with Uganda." White House National Security Advisor Susan Rice tweeted yesterday that she had spoken at length with Museveni to urge him not to sign the bill

Recent Articles of Interest

From SSRN:

• Manuel Vargas, The Runeberg Problem: Theism, Libertarianism, and Motivated Reasoning, (in Kevin Timpe & Daniel Speak, eds., Libertarianism and Free Will: the Interplay of Religious Belief and Free Will (Oxford Univ. Press, Forthcoming)).
• Frederick Mark Gedicks, Brief of Amici Curiae Church-State Scholars in Support of the Government in Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. & Conestoga Wood Specialties Corp. v. Sebelius, (January 28, 2014).
• Daniel Austin, How to Reconcile the Establishment Clause and Standing Doctrine in Religious Display Cases with a New Coercion Test, (February 4, 2014).
• Karen Jordan, A Christian Vision of Freedom and Democracy: Neutrality as an Obstacle to Freedom, (February 7, 2014).
• Michael Stokes Paulsen, Kermit Gosnell and Uncle Tom's Cabin, (St. Thomas Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2014, Forthcoming).
• Vivian Grosswald Curran, Reviving Human Rights Legislation After Kiobel, (American Journal of International Law, Vol. 107, p. 858, 2013).
• Neil Siegel, Federalism as a Way Station: Windsor as Exemplar of Doctrine in Motion, (February 14, 2014). 

From SSRN (Legal Issues of Pakistan):

• Shahbaz Ahmad Cheema, Socially Abhorrent But Legally Acceptable: A Study of Alleged Conversions of Sunnis and Shias in Cases of Inheritance in Pakistan, (South Asian Studies, A Research Journal of South Asian Studies, Vol. 29, No. 1, January -July 2014, pp. 281-291).
• Shahbaz Ahmad Cheema, The Federal Shariat Court’s Role to Determine the Scope of ‘Injunctions of Islam’ and Its Implications, (Journal of Islamic State Practices in International Law, Vol. 9, Issue. 2 (2013)).
• Shahbaz Ahmad Cheema & Samee Uzair Khan, Genealogical Analysis of Islamic Law Books Relied on in the Courts of Pakistan, (Al-Adwa December 2013).
• Shahbaz Ahmad Cheema, The Significance of Socio-Political Context in Shaping the Authenticity of Jamaat-I-Islami's Gender Discourse, (Pakistaniaat: A Journal of Pakistan Studies Vol. 5, No. 2 (2013)).
• Shahbaz Ahmad Cheema, An Analysis of Women's Contribution to the Gender Discourse of Jamaat-I-Islami of Pakistan, (Wagadu, Volume 11, 2013).
• Shahbaz Ahmad Cheema, Federal Shariat Court as a Vehicle of Progressive Trends in Islamic Scholarship in Pakistan, (Al-Adwa January-June 2013).

From SSRN (Other Country-Specific Research):

• Milja Radovic, Citizenship and Religion in the Post-Yugoslav States, (CITSEE Working Paper 2013/35 (2013)).
• Elif Bulut & Helen Rose Ebaugh, Religion and Assimilation Among Turkish Muslim Immigrants: Comparing Practicing and Non-Practicing Muslims, (Int. Migration & Integration, 2013, DOI: 10.1007/s12134-013-0301-9).
• Mahmudul Hasan, Communalism in Bangladesh and the Real Spirit of Islam Along with the Legal Mandates for Securing Justice for All, (January 15, 2014).
• Michael Buehler, Subnational Islamization Through Secular Parties: Comparing Shari'a Politics in Two Indonesian Provinces, (Comparative Politics 46.1 (2013): 63-82).
• Shahbaz Ahmad Cheema, Tagore Law Lecturer's Contribution to Islamic Legal Scholarship in British India, (Al-Qalam December 2013).

From SSRN (Islamic Law):

• Septian Bayu Kristanto, Organizational Commitment Differences: Islamic vs. Conventional Banks, (February 15, 2014).
• Sajad Gholami, Mehdi Hariri & Peyman Akbari, Innervation and Moan Review Process, from the Perspective of Law, and Knowledge of Management Accounting, (Scientific Journal of Review (2014) 3(1) 17-22).

Malaysian Court Dismisses Prosecutions Against Shias On Technical Grounds

The Wall Street Journal reported yesterday that in Malaysia, Shia Muslims are heartened by the dismissal on technical grounds of a prosecution against 3 men for violating a local fatwa requiring Malaysians to follow Sunni teachings. The fatwa, issued in 2012 by the Perak state fatwa council, is similar to ones adopted in 11 of the country's 14 states after the National Fatwa Council issued a similar ruling in 1996. The 3 men were charged with possessing books and other items relating to Shia Islam, but a Sharia Lower Court judge ruled that two of the charges against the defendants were unclear. Two other Shias were released on similar grounds several weeks ago. However over the last year there have been a growing number of cases against Shias and practitioners of other minority religions.

Recent Prisoner Free Exercise Cases

In Pittman-Bey v. Celum, (5th Cir., Feb. 14, 2014), the 5th Circuit held that defendants in a prisoner lawsuit had qualified immunity because "there is neither controlling authority nor a robust consensus of persuasive authority showing that a Muslim inmate who did not participate in Jumu'ah services was entitled to participate in Ramadan activities and after sunset meals."

In Cauthen v. Rivera, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16641 (ED CA, Feb. 7, 2014), a California federal magistrate judge recommended that a Rastafarian inmate be permitted to proceed with his complaint that his free exercise and RLUIPA rights were infringed when he was subjected to an unclothed body cavity search in the presence of female staff.

In Pattison v. Nevada, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17109 (D NV, Feb. 11, 2014), a Nevada federal district court refused to reconsider its original imposition of sanctions of $100 on defendants who frivolously removed to federal court (after 2 years of state court litigation) a Jewish inmate's state court complaint that he was being denied kosher meals.

In Wallace v. Miller, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17602 (SD IL, Feb. 12, 2014), an Illinois federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendations (2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 185068, Aug. 22, 2013) and dismissed many of the claims by an inmate who was an adherent of Satmar Hasidic Judaism who contended that he was deprived of sufficient nutrition in connection with the amount of food he received on religious fast days, as well as claiming retaliation and differential treatment. However the court permitted plaintiff to proceed with a claim against the dietary services manager and the senior chaplain for damages for failure to provide kosher meals, as well as certain claims against other defendants.

In Bucano v. Monroe County Correctional Facility, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17877 (MD PA, Feb. 10, 2014), a Pennsylvania federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendations (2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17122, Jan. 7, 2014) only in part and allowed an inmate to move ahead against one defendant on her claim that she was forced to eat non-kosher food. The defendant had not moved for dismissal. The remainder of the case was dismissed.

In Johnson v. Martin, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17649 (WD MI, Feb. 12, 2014), a Michigan federal district court adopted in part a magistrate's recommendations (2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18460, Jan. 14, 2014) and dismissed an inmate's complaint that he was denied Jewish reading material and a kosher diet, concluding that plaintiff failed to show that he has a sincerely held religious belief that requires accommodation.

In Boone v. Coleman, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18739 (CD IL, Feb. 14, 2014), an Illinois federal district court permitted a Messianic Hebrew inmate to proceed against a correctional officer, but not other defendants, on his complaint that he was denied a kosher diet.

In Marron v. Jabe, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19150 (ED VA, Feb. 14, 2014), a Virginia federal district court dismissed a Muslim inmate's objections to a prison rule that requires CDs or tapes to be ordered through a single vendor. The policy led to authorities refusing to allow plaintiff to have two religious non-music tapes that he had ordered through a different vendor.