North Carolina's Attempt To Repeal "Bathroom Bill" Fails

As reported by the Washington Post, yesterday's special session of the North Carolina legislature that had been called to repeal the state's controversial anti-transgender "bathroom bill" was unsuccessful in doing so.  It appeared that a compromise had been worked out to repeal the law that prevents transgender individuals from using school and government office building restrooms that match their gender identity. (See prior posting.)  The city of Charlotte repealed its local non-discrimination ordinance that had triggered the state legislature's action.  However, the state repeal bill introduced in the legislature included a six-month moratorium on any city enacting a nondiscrimination ordinance to protect LGBT rights.  That limit was unacceptable to Democrats in the legislature.  Senate President Pro Tempore Phil Berger blamed the failure of the repeal on the Democrats, saying:

Their action proves they only wanted a repeal in order to force radical social engineering and shared bathrooms across North Carolina, at the expense of our state’s families, our reputation and our economy.

Preliminary Injunction Issued Against Illinois Conscience Act Amendments

In Pregnancy Care Center of Rockford, Inc. v. Rauner, (IL Cir. Ct., Dec. 20, 2016), an Illinois state trial court granted a preliminary injunction preventing enforcement against conscientious objectors of recently enacted amendments to the Illinois Healthcare Right of Conscience Act.  According to the court:

While the Conscience Act allows medical care providers to decline to participate in medical procedures to which they have moral objections, the amendments to the Act ... require providers to provide information and referral assistance with respect to a patient's "legal treatment options" as a precondition to invoking the Act's protections.

Invoking intermediate scrutiny of regulation of "professional speech" under the Illinois constitution, the court said that the legislature has imposed an obligation to furnish information only on conscientious objectors.  It goes on:

The Court concludes that plaintiffs have raised a "fair question" about whether SB 1564 unnecessarily burdens their right to be free from government compelled speech to a degree more than necessary to serve the state's interest in educating patients.

CatholicCitizens.org provides a lengthier analysis of the decision.

Suit Challenges College's Speech Zones and Speech Code

A student at Georgia Gwinnett College has filed suit in federal district court challenging the school's Speech Zone and Speech Code Policies. The 76-page complaint (full text) in Uzuegbunam v. Preczewski, (ND GA, filed 12/19/2016), says that plaintiff was stopped from distributing religious literature on campus when he was outside two small designated speech zones, and that when he tried to share his religious views in one of the designated speech zones he was told that his speech constituted disorderly conduct because it had generated complaints. Plaintiff asks for a declaratory judgment and injunction finding that the speech policies violate his free speech, free exercise, equal protection and due process rights. The Daily Signal reports on the lawsuit.

Removal of Secular "Nativity Scene" May Be Viewpoint Discrimination

In Freedom From Religion Foundation v. Abbott, (WD TX, Dec. 20, 2016), a Texas federal district court allowed plaintiff to move ahead with one aspect of its free speech claim in its challenge to the Texas governor's order removing from the Texas State Capitol exhibition area plaintiff's Bill of Rights "Nativity Scene." The display was accompanied by a banner that focuses on the Winter Solstice and separation of church and state.  The Texas State Preservation Board originally approved the display, but Texas Gov. Greg Abbott who is executive director of the Board instructed that it be taken down.  He contended that the display did not meet the requirement of promoting a "public purpose." The court held:

In this case, a genuine issue of material fact exists as to whether Defendants' decision to remove FFRF's exhibit constitutes viewpoint discrimination.

Plaintiff's other 1st and 14th Amendment challenges were dismissed. Dallas News reports on the decision.

Amicus Says Trademark Case Impacts Religious Speech

Next month, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Lee v. Tam (SCOTUSblog case page).  The case involves a free speech challenge to the Lanham Act which allows the government to deny trademark registration to a mark "which may disparage * * * persons, living or dead, institutions, beliefs,
or national symbols, or bring them into contempt, or disrepute." On Monday the Becket Fund filed an amicus brief in the case focusing on the impact of the disparagement clause on religious speech. The brief argued in part:

Disagreements about deeply important issues such as religion can often be experienced as disparaging.... [I]t would be wrong for the government to punish speech simply because it wants to protect some religious “institutions” and “beliefs” from criticism.

In fact, to its credit, the United States has for many decades led the fight to convince other countries and international bodies to allow disparaging speech, and to resist using the law to punish those who disparage religion or commit blasphemy.

Slovakian President Vetoes Anti-Muslim Bill; Override Expected

AFP reports that in Slovakia yesterday, President Andrej Kiska vetoed as "discriminatory" a bill that would make it more difficult for Muslims and other religious minorities to receive government subsidies.  Currently under Slovakian law, a religion must have at least 20,000 followers in the country in order to qualify for subsidies.  The bill that was passed by the National Council (the Parliament) would increase that number to 50,000.  Some 2,000 to 5,000 Muslims currently live in Slovakia, whose total population is 5.4 million. It is expected that the National Council will override the President's veto after Prime Minister Robert Fico told reporters, "While I am prime minister, I will never agree to establish a unified Muslim community in Slovakia."

Israeli Rabbi Tells Jewish Students At The Technion To Avoid Christmas Tree

As reported yesterday by Arutz Sheva and Haaretz, in Israel, the rabbi of the renowned university the Technion has created a furor by telling Jewish students that they should not enter the Student Union because of a Christmas tree that is being displayed there. Rabbi Elad Dokow wrote:

The Christmas tree is a religious symbol – not Christian, but even more problematic – pagan. Halakha [Jewish religious law] clearly states that whenever it is possible to circumvent and not pass through a place where there is any kind of idolatry, this must be done. So one should not enter the student union if it's not necessary to do so. 

The Technion-- an over 100-year old research university-- which prides itself on welcoming students of all religions and communities rejected Dokow's views, saying that it is determined to continue being an example of tolerance and coexistence.

England's Charity Commission Refuses To Register Jedi Order As A Religion

Last week, the Charity Commission for England and Wales rejected an application by the Temple of the Jedi Order (TOTJO)-- an organization whose doctrines are inspired by Star Wars-- to be entered onto the register of charities. (Full text of Commission's Dec. 16 ruling.) TOTJO claimed that its purpose is: "To advance the religion of Jediism, for the public benefit worldwide, in accordance with the Jedi Doctrine." The ruling says in part:

... [R]eligion in charity law is characterised by belief in one or more gods or spiritual or non-secular principles or things, and a relationship between the adherents of the religion and the gods, principles or things which is expressed by worship, reverence and adoration, veneration intercession or by some other religious rite or service. In addition, that it must be capable of providing moral and ethical value or edification to the public and characterised by a certain level of cogency, seriousness, cohesion and importance.

... The Commission has ... concluded that Jediism does not meet the characteristics of a religion for the purposes of charity law....

The Commission also rejected the argument that TOTJO should be listed as a charity under the promotion of moral or ethical improvement standard. The Guardian reports on the ruling.

USCIRF Appoints Singshinsuk As Executive Director

The U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom announced yesterday that  Erin D. Singshinsuk, who has served since September as the Commission's Acting Executive Director has now been named Executive Director. According to the press release:

Ms. Singshinsuk has over 25 years of experience managing and working directly in support of federal commissions.  She has been affiliated with numerous organizations with an international focus, including the U.S. Institute of Peace (USIP) where she served as the Vice President for Management and the Chief Financial Officer.

Where Will Ivanka and Her Husband Pray?

Politico reported yesterday on the speculation swirling in Washington over which Orthodox synagogue "first-daughter" Ivanka Trump and  her husband Jared Kushner will make their religious home.  Many are suggesting that Georgetown's Kesher Israel is a front-runner.  Meanwhile The Forward speculates that the couple might opt for a private synagogue, or build a private one of their own, saying: "In-house worship spaces are a hot commodity for the observant wealthy."

Senate Judiciary Chairman Refers Planned Parenthood Groups For Possible Prosecution

U.S. Senator Chuck Grassley, Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee announced last week that he is referring several Planned Parenthood affiliates and companies, as well as the Planned Parenthood Federation of America, to the FBI and the Department of Justice for investigation and possible prosecution for conspiracy to violate 42 USC §289g-2, the law that bans buying or selling of human fetal tissue. In a letter (full text) to the Attorney General and Director of the FBI, Grassley indicated he was attaching a lengthy report (full text) from the Committee's Majority Staff.

Winter Solstice Displays Counter Religious Ones

Again this year, the Freedom From Religion Foundation is erecting Winter Solstice signs and displays to counter religiously themed Christmas displays on public property.  Beginning last weekend, a Bill of Rights "Nativity Scene" was placed in the Iowa State Capitol to counter a traditional Nativity Scene that went up there for the first time. (FFRF press release, Dec. 15).  And in Shelton, Connecticut, a lawsuit was settled allowing a winter solstice "Let Reason Prevail" sign to be placed on city property to counter religious displays by the American Legion (in another park) and the Cub Scouts. Ultimately the American Legion display was also changed to a secular one because light bulbs on the original angel display burned out. (Valley Independent Sentinel, Dec. 14).

UPDATE: Here is the full text of the Shelton, CT settlement agreement.

Recent Articles and Book of Interest

From SSRN:

• Raphael Cohen-Almagor, Hate and Racist Speech in the United States: A Critique, (Philosophy and Public Issues, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 77-123, 2016).
• Niousha Roshani, Grassroots Perspectives on Hate Speech, Race, & Inequality in Brazil & Colombia, (Berkman Klein Center Research Publication No. 2016-18, Dec. 2016).
• Andrew Sellars, Defining Hate Speech, (Berkman Klein Center Research Publication No. 2016-20, Dec. 2016).
• Robert Faris, Amar Ashar, Urs Gasser & Daisy Joo, Understanding Harmful Speech Online, (Berkman Klein Center Research Publication No. 2016-21, Dec. 2016).
• Chinmayi Arun & Nakul Nayak, Preliminary Findings on Online Hate Speech and the Law in India, (Berkman Klein Center Research Publication No. 2016-19, Dec. 2016).

From SSRN:

• Aaron R. Petty, Religion, Conscience, and Belief in the European Court of Human Rights, 48 George Washington International Law Review 807-851 (2016).
• Vincent J. Samar, The Potential Impact of Hobby Lobby on LGBT Civil Rights, 16 Georgetown Journal of Gender & Law 547-591 (2015).

Recent Book:

• Jane Calderwood Norton, Freedom of Religious Organizations, (Oxford Univ. Press, Aug. 2016).

Recent Prisoner Free Exercise Cases

In Brooks v. Williams, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 171453 (SD IL, Dec. 12, 2016), an Illinois federal district court allowed an inmate to move ahead with this complaint that he was denied access to Rastafari Sabbath services, but dismissed without prejudice has claim that he was denie access to a holy Piby religious text.

In Alamiin v. Patton, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 172044 (WD OK, Dec. 13, 2016), an Oklahoma federal district court while dismissing a number of claims allowed an inmate to move ahead with his claim regarding an improper halal diet.

In Parkell v. Senato, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 172419 (D DE, Dec. 13, 2016), a Delaware federal district court dismissed on qualified immunity grounds the two-year delay in furnishing kosher meals to an inmate whose religious beliefs combined Judaism and Wicca.

In Davies v. Toole, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 172978 (SD GA, Dec. 14, 2016), a Georgia federal magistrate judge concluded that a Muslim inmate stated a colorable claim for injunctive relief and nominal damages for refusal to provide him a vegan diet. A preliminary injunction was denied.

In El-Shaddai v. Stainer, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 173755 (CD CA, Dec. 13, 2016), a California federal district court dismissed complaints seeking accommodations for a kosher diet, religious name change, Messianic Hebrew religious services and ritual herbal smoking blends by an inmate claiming to be a practitioner of various occult traditions including the Hermetic Order of Melchizedek.

In Bey v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 174301 (MD PA, Dec. 15, 2016), a Pennsylvania federal magistrate judge recommended that an inmate who is an adherent of Moorish Science Temple of America be allowed to move ahead on his Establishment Clause challenge to a Therapeutic Community program, alleging it has a religious component.

Maine OK's Pagan Priest Wearing Goat Horns In License Photo

The Washington Post reported today that a Pagan Priest, Phelan Moonsong, won the right earlier this month to wear a pair of goat horns in his Maine drivers license photo. Apparently Maine's motor vehicle bureau approved his request after he told them he had been in contact with the ACLU.  The state says that Moonsong did not mention that the goat horns were religious when he initially visited the Bureau of Motor Vehicles.

Firing Clerk Who Refused To Process Same-Sex Marriage Licenses Did Not Violate Title VII

In Summers v. Whitis, (SD IN, Dec. 15, 2016), an Indiana federal district court held that an Indiana County Clerk did not violate Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act when she fired a deputy clerk who refused, on religious grounds, to process marriage licenses for same-sex couples. The court held:

Here, the court finds no objective conflict between Summers’ duties as a deputy clerk and her religious opposition to same-sex marriage. When it came to marriage licenses, Summers’ job merely required her to process the licenses by entering data and handing out information. Specifically, she had to pull up the application, verify that certain information was correct, collect a statutory fee, print a form, and record the license in a book for public record. At bottom, she was simply tasked with certifying–on  behalf of the state of Indiana, not on her own behalf– that the couple was qualified to marry under Indiana law. The duties were purely administrative.

To be clear, Summers did not perform marriage ceremonies or personally sign marriage licenses or certificates. She was not required to attend ceremonies, say congratulations, offer a blessing, or pray with couples. Her employer did not make her express religious approval or condone any particular marriage. Summers remained free to practice her Christian faith and attend church services. She was even free to maintain her belief that marriage is a union between one man and one woman. Thus, she was not forced to “choose between [her] religious convictions and [her] job.”...

... [T]he court does not question the sincerity of Summers’ beliefs. She maintains that “it’s not God’s law to have [same-sex couples] marry,” ... and has pointed to select verses from the Bible in support. That is fine; she has every right to believe that. However, that belief, no matter how sincerely espoused, does not objectively conflict with the purely administrative duty to process marriage licenses. Summers’ desire to avoid handling forms related to activities of which she personally disapproves is not protected by federal law. Title VII is not a license for employees to  perform only those duties that meet their private approval.

The court held, alternatively, that any religious conflict was with federal law, not with an employment requirement.

Voting Fraud Indictments Are Latest In Battle Over Hasidic Development In NY Town

As reported yesterday by The Forward, since 2012 the village of Bloomingburg, New York has been embroiled in a battle over whether an ultra-Orthodox Jewish community would expand into the town:

To the Orthodox and their allies, resistance to new Jewish neighbors can look like anti-Semitism. To the non-Orthodox, the arrival of a Hasidic community, with its schools and its institutions and its rabbinic authority, can feel like an invasion.

In Bloomingburg, local governments and an Orthodox developer have faced off in court, and in raucous village meetings, amid a volley of accusations of voter fraud and hate crimes.

The Forward article traces what appeared to be the success of Satmar Hasidim in expanding into the village. (See prior Religion Clause postings on Bloomingburg.) However yesterday, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York announced the indictment (full text) of three men on charges of conspiracy to corrupt the electoral process in Bloomingburg in order to obtain clearance to build a housing development for members of the Satmar community:

In pursuit of millions of dollars in profits from a real estate development project, the defendants allegedly hatched a cynical ploy to corrupt the electoral process in Bloomingburg.  As alleged, to get public officials supportive of their development project elected to local government, the defendants concocted a scheme to falsely register voters who did not live in Bloomingburg, including some who had never even set foot there.  And to cover up their voter fraud scheme, the defendants allegedly back-dated fake leases and even placed toothpaste and toothbrushes in empty apartments to make them appear occupied by the falsely registered voters.  Profit-driven corruption of democracy cannot be allowed to stand no matter who does it or where it happens.

One of those indicted was developer Shalom Lamm whose father, Norman Lamm served for many years as president of Yeshiva University. The Forward reports on the indictments.

A fourth man was indicted and has pleaded guilty to charges of conspiracy to submit false voter registrations. (Full text of Information.)

Court Allows Peanuts Christmas Poster To Go Back Up, With Minor Change

As previously reported, on Tuesday of this week the Kileen, Texas school board voted to support a middle school principal who told a staff member to take down a 6-foot tall Peanuts character Christmas poster because it featured a Biblical quotation, or else to remove the religious language from it. Texas Values blog reports on the quick reaction.  On Wednesday, a lawsuit was filed on behalf of Dedra Shannon, the school clinic aide who had put up the poster.  The complaint (full text) in Shannon v. Kileen Independent School District, (TX Dist. Ct., filed 12/14/2016), contends that the censoring of the poster violates Shannon's free speech and free exercise rights. Yesterday, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton moved to intervene on Shannon's side, arguing that "Texas must ensure that schools respect the ability of religious people to express freely their ideas and not misapply establishment principles." (Full text of Plea in Intervention.) Yesterday afternoon the court issued a temporary restraining order allowing Ms. Shannon to again put up her Christmas poster, but required an additional line on it stating: "Ms. Shannon’s Christmas Message."

Evangelical Leader Opposes Trump's Choice For Secretary of State

In his Washington Update this week, Christian Evangelical leader Tony Perkins voices strong opposition to President-Elect Donald Trump's choice for Secretary of State.  Perkins has the following to say about the nominee, ExxonMobil CEO Rex Tillerson:

The Left, which doesn't usually need a reason to oppose Trump's choices, won't find many here, since the ExxonMobil executive may be the greatest ally liberals have in the Cabinet for their abortion and LGBT agendas. That should be particularly alarming to conservatives, who've spent the last eight years watching the State Department lead the global parade for the slaughter of innocent unborn children and the intimidation of nations with natural views on marriage and sexuality.... 

To hear that Donald Trump may be appointing a man who not only led the charge to open the Boy Scouts to gay troop leaders but whose company directly gives to Planned Parenthood is upsetting at best.... Trump calls Rex a "world class player and dealmaker," but if these are the kinds of deals Tillerson makes -- sending dollars to an abortion business that's just been referred for criminal prosecution and risking the well-being of young boys under his charge in an attempt to placate radical homosexual activists -- then who knows what sort of "diplomacy" he would champion at DOS?

U.S. Sues Sterling Heights, Michigan Over Zoning Denial For Mosque

The Department of Justice announced yesterday that it has filed suit against the city of Sterling Heights, Michigan claiming that the city violated the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act by denying a Special Approval Land Use application that would have allowed construction of a mosque on five adjoining lots in the city.  The complaint (full text) in United States v. City of Sterling Heights, (ED MI, filed 12/15/2016), alleges that this is the only special use application for a house of worship that has been denied by the city since 2006.  The mosque became the subject of opposition framed in anti-Muslim terms, and also became a local election issue especially among local Chaldean Christian business owners. Click On Detroit reports on the lawsuit.

This is the second RLUIPA suit filed this week by the Justice Department over denials of land use permits for a mosque. (See prior posting.)