Bidens Extend Wishes for Eid Mubarak To Muslims Around The World

The Muslim festival of Eid al-Fitr began at sundown last night. President Biden and First Lady Jill Biden issued a Statement (full text) yesterday extending warmest wishes and Eid Mubarak to those celebrating the end of Ramadan. The Statement says in part:

This year, as we mark Eid al-Fitr, we hold in our hearts the millions of displaced persons and refugees around the globe who are spending this sacred holiday separated from their families and unsure of their future, but still hoping for a brighter tomorrow. As a nation we must always keep faith with those seeking a better life, and uphold our commitment to serving as a beacon of hope for oppressed people around the world. And, Muslims across the United States celebrate Eid, let us renew our dedication to our foundational commitment to respecting all faiths and beliefs.

The President and First Lady later today will host a reception in the East Room to celebrate Eid.

UPDATE: Here are the President's remarks at the White House Eid reception.

Recent Articles of Interest

From SSRN:

• Justin Collings & Stephanie H. Barclay, Taking Justification Seriously: Proportionality, Strict Scrutiny, and the Substance of Religious Liberty, 63 Boston College Law Review 453 (2022).
• Nicholas Aroney, Christianity and Constitutional Law,  (Forthcoming, in John Witte and Rafael Domingo (eds), Oxford Handbook on Christianity and Law, Oxford University Press, 2022).
• Kelly Deere, Democratizing Emergencies: The Local Predicament,  (101 N.C.L. Rev. F. ___ (Forthcoming, 2022)).
• Lael Daniel Weinberger, The Limits of Church Autonomy, (Notre Dame Law Review, Forthcoming).
• Maya McGrath, Teacher Prayer in Public Schools, (Fordham Law Review, Vol. 90, No. 5, 2022).
• Rosemary Teele Langford & Miranda Webster, Misuse of Power in the Australian Charities Sector, (University of New South Wales Law Journal, Vol. 45, No. 1, 2022).
• Bryan Thomas, et. al., Vaccine Ins and Outs: An Exploration of the Legal Issues Raised by Vaccine Passports, (C.D. Howe Institute working paper, 2021).
• Michael Conklin, Anti-Semitism and the Overlooked Benefits of Allowing 'Hate Speech', (April 2022).
• Julie C. Suk, A World Without Roe: The Constitutional Future of Unwanted Pregnancy, (William & Mary Law Review, Vol. 64, No. 2, 2022).
• Gregory Bigler, Foundations of Tribal Society: Art, Dreams, and the Last Old Woman, (UCLA School of Law, The Indigenous Peoples’ Journal of Law, Culture & Resistance, 7(1) (2022)).
• Jeffrey Pennell & Reid K. Weisbord, Trust Alteration and the Dead Hand Paradox, (ACTEC Law Journal, 2023 Forthcoming).

From SmartCILP:

• Ayelet Hoffmann Libson & Adi Libson, Replacing God with Big Data: Personalizing Copyright Law, 39 Boston University International Law Journal 181-206 (2021).
• Kellen R. Funk, Book Review. Propertied Rites. Beyond Belief, Beyond Conscience: The Radical Significance of the Free Exercise of Religion, by Jack N. Rakove. Church State Corporation: Construing Religion in US Law, by Winnifred Fallers Sullivan, 36 Constitutional Commentary 175-212 (2021).

Oklahoma Legislature Passes Fetal Heartbeat Abortion Law

The Oklahoma legislature on Thursday gave final approval to SB1503 (full text), a Fetal Heartbeat Abortion Law modeled after the Texas statute.  The law bars abortions once a physician detects a fetal heartbeat (usually around 6 weeks in a pregnancy) except in cases of medical emergency.  The ban is enforceable only through private civil actions for statutory damages of not less than $10,000 brought by any person other than a public official. An action may be brought against anyone who performs, induces, aids or abets an abortion (other than the woman on whom an abortion was performed). Once damages have been awarded in one action, a court may not award relief for the same abortion in subsequent actions. A court may not award attorney's fees to a defendant in actions under the law, and actions under the law are not subject to the Oklahoma Religious Freedom Act. Governor Kevin Stitt is expected to quickly sign the bill into law.

On Thursday, even though the law had not yet been signed by the governor, suit was filed in the Oklahoma Supreme Court challenging the law.  The complaint (full text) in Oklahoma Call for Reproductive Justice v. State of Oklahoma, (OK Sup. Ct., filed 4/28/2022), which also names as defendants the clerk of courts in every Oklahoma county, alleges that the law violates ten separate provisions of the Oklahoma Constitution. Vox reports on developments.

President Declares May "Jewish American Heritage Month"

President Biden today issued a Proclamation (full text) declaring May 2022 as Jewish American Heritage Month. The Proclamation reads in part:

The Jewish American story, and the story of our Nation as a whole, is fueled by faith, resilience, and hope.  It is a story defined by a firm belief in possibilities, the resolve to make real the promise of America for all Americans, and a commitment to perfecting our Union, heeding the timeless words of Rabbi Tarfon, the first-century scholar who taught “It is not your duty to finish the work, but neither are you at liberty to neglect it.”

An interesting sidelight: Typically Presidential Proclamations end with the date of the Proclamation. The year is routinely set out, for example, as: "in the year of our Lord two thousand twenty-two, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and forty-sixth." The Jewish American Heritage Month Proclamation omits the phrase "in the year of our Lord, recognizing the Christian nature of that reference.

Oklahoma Bans Nonbinary Designations On Birth Certificates

 On Tuesday, Oklahoma Governor Kevin Stitt signed SB 1100 (full text) which provides:

... [T]he biological sex designation on a certificate of birth issued under this section shall be either male or female and shall not be nonbinary or any symbol representing a nonbinary designation including but not limited to the letter “X”.

Fatherly reports on the new law.

11th Circuit Hears Oral Arguments In City Prayer Vigil Case

 Yesterday, the U.S. 11th Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral arguments (audio of full arguments) in Rojas v. City of Ocala, Florida. In the case, , a Florida federal district court held that the City of Ocala, Florida and its police chief violated the Establishment Clause when they organized and promoted a prayer vigil in response to a shooting spree plaguing the city. (See prior posting.) Fox35 reports on the case ahead of the oral arguments.

Free Exercise Challenge To Washington Vaccine Mandate Is Dismissed

 In Wise v. Inslee, (ED WA, April 27, 2022), a Washington federal district court dismissed various challenges to Washington state's vaccine mandate for certain state employees, including free exercise, Title VII religious discrimination, and Establishment Clause claims. The court said in part:

... [T]he State clearly has a legitimate government interest in preventing the spread of COVID-19, an interest that has been endorsed by the Ninth Circuit.... Additionally, the Proclamation is rationally related to that interest because it is based on overwhelming evidence that the vaccines are safe and effective, and increasing vaccination rates among those employees who come into regular contact with vulnerable populations is a rational action to reduce the spread of COVID-19. Accordingly, the Proclamation easily survives federal constitutional scrutiny....

More Context Needed In Student's Suit Over Right To Wear Shirt With Anti-Gay Bible Verse

In B.A.P. v. Overton County Board of Education, (MD TN, April 27, 2022), a Tennessee federal district court refused to dismiss a suit challenging on free exercise and free speech grounds a school's disciplining of a student who refused to take off a shirt that read: "homosexuality is a sin - 1 Corinthians 6:9-10." The court said in part:

 "[T]o justify prohibition of a particular expression of opinion" under Tinker, a school must show that it acted out of '"more than a mere desire to avoid the discomfort and unpleasantness that always accompany an unpopular viewpoint,' but rather, 'that the school authorities had reason to anticipate that the [student’s expression] would substantially interfere with the work of the school or would impinge upon the rights of other students.'"...

Here, an adequate analysis of B.A.P.’s First Amendment claims ... requires a more developed record than is available on a motion to dismiss. ....

Plaintiffs allege that Henson removed B.A.P. from class due to the message on her shirt, Melton did not allow her to return to class because of this message, and both Melton and Henson told B.A.P. she could not wear the shirt to school going forward. The Amended Complaint does not, however, supply specific facts and context about Livingston Academy and the surrounding community at the time Melton and Henson took these actions. Without this context, the Court cannot determine whether Melton and Henson reasonably forecasted that the message on B.A.P.’s shirt would cause substantial disruption or interference with the rights of other students. Accordingly, B.A.P.’s First Amendment claims against Melton and Henson will not be dismissed for failure to state a claim.

Parents Sue Over School's Nondisclosure Of Children's Gender Identity Issues

Suit was filed in a Massachusetts federal district court earlier this month by four parents challenging a school policy to not notify parents of their child’s gender nonconformity or transgender status unless the child consents. The complaint in Foote v. Ludlow School Committee, (D MA, filed 4/12/2022), (full text) alleges that the policy violates parental rights of all the plaintiffs, as well as the free exercise rights of certain of the plaintiffs. It alleges in part:

158. Plaintiffs have sincerely held religious beliefs that all people are to be treated with respect and compassion, and that respect and compassion do not include misrepresenting an individual’s natural created identity as either a male or a female.

159. Plaintiffs have sincerely held religious beliefs that individuals are to speak the truth, including speaking the truth regarding matters of sexual identity as a male or female.

160. Defendants’ actions in excluding Plaintiffs Feliciano and Salmeron from decision making regarding their children’s sexual and gender identity target the Plaintiffs’ beliefs regarding the created order, human nature, sexuality, gender, ethics, and morality which constitute central components of their sincerely held religious beliefs.

Christian Post reports on the lawsuit.

Suit Challenges Maine's Ban On Sunday Hunting

Suit was filed yesterday in a Maine state trial court challenging Maine's ban on Sunday hunting. The complaint (full text) in Parker v. Camuso, (ME Super. Ct., filed 4/27/2022),  contends that the Right To Food Amendment to Maine's constitution (Art. I, Sec. 25) adopted in 2021 invalidates the state's ban on Sunday hunting as applied to individuals who hunt on Sundays to harvest food for themselves and their families. The complaint calls the Sunday hunting ban "a historical and religious anachronism."  Portland Press Herald reports on the lawsuit.

1st Circuit: Employees With Religious Objection To Vaccine Mandate Not Entitled To Injunction

In Together Employees v. Mass General Brigham, Inc., (1st Cir., April 27, 2022), the U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals denied a preliminary injunction to hospital employees who were denied religious exemptions from the hospital's COVID vaccine mandate. The court held that the employees failed to show the irreparable injury necessary to obtain injunctive relief, saying in part:

It is black-letter law that "money damages ordinarily provide an appropriate remedy" for unlawful termination of employment.

European Court Says Switzerland Wrongly Denied Asylum To Pakistani Convert To Christianity

In M.A.M. v. Suisse, (ECHR, April 26, 2022) [decision in French], the European Court of Human Rights ruled in favor of a Pakistani asylee in Switzerland.  The Court's English language press release summarizes the case and its holding:

M.A.M. is a Pakistani national who had converted from Islam to Christianity while in Switzerland, where he had arrived in 2015 and where his asylum request had been rejected.

[T]he ... Court ... held, unanimously, that if the decision to expel the applicant to Pakistan were to be executed there would be a violation of Article 2 (right to life) and Article 3 (prohibition of torture, inhuman or degrading treatment) of the European Convention on Human Rights, in the absence of an assessment of the risk to which the applicant was exposed on account of the overall situation of Christian converts in Pakistan and of his own personal situation. The Court ruled that the assessment by the Swiss authorities of the risk facing the applicant on account of his conversion to Christianity if he were expelled to Pakistan had been insufficient to uphold the rejection of his asylum request....

[Thanks to @sacrareleges for the lead.]

California Court Says "Get" Denial Can Be Basis For Denying Husband Child Custody

The Forward last week reported on a February 7 decision by a California trial court which interpreted 2020 amendments to the state's Family Code (Senate Bill 1141) as allowing a family court to use a husband's refusal to give his wife a Jewish bill of divorce (a "get") as the basis for awarding the wife child custody. Senate Bill 1141 adds "coercive control", defined as "a pattern of behavior that in purpose or effect unreasonably interferes with a person’s free will and personal liberty," as the basis for ex parte orders.  That, in turn, creates a rebuttable presumption that awarding child custody to the person exerting coercive control is not in the best interests of the child. The court ruled that denial of a get amounted to coercive control. The full text of the court's decision does not appear to be available online.

CAIR Issues Report On Structural Islamophobia

Yesterday, the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) released a report titled Still Suspect: The Impact of Structural Islamophobia (full text).The Executive Summary says in part:

The title of this report is Still Suspect: The Impact of Structural Islamophobia. The word structural is significant in the understanding that Islamophobia has seeped into every part of our society. It has made its way into government institutions and the public sphere through laws and policies, political rhetoric, and other manifestations.  For example, in 2021, CAIR received a total of 6,720 complaints nationwide involving a range of issues including immigration and travel, discrimination, law enforcement and government overreach, hate and bias incidents, incarceree rights, school incidents, and anti-BDS/free speech. These complaints clearly indicate that government discrimination and bias continue to have a disproportionate effect on American Muslims and further demonstrate that our communities continue to be viewed with suspicion.

CLS Members Sue University Of Idaho Over No-Contact Orders

Three members of the Christian Legal Society at the University of Idaho filed suit against University administrators on Monday contending that the University's Title IX Policy and Conduct and Discipline Policies, facially and as applied to them violate their free speech, free exercise and due process rights.  The complaint (full text) in Perlot v. Green, (D ID, filed 4/25/2022) alleges that the University's Office of Civil Rights and Investigations issued "no contact" orders against the three students barring the from having contact with another student with whom they had had a discussion about Christian views on sexuality and marriage. ADF issued a press release announcing the filing of the lawsuit.

Reports On 2021 Antisemitic Incidents Released

 The ADL yesterday released its annual Audit of Antisemitic Incidents 2021 (full text). According to the report's Executive Summary:

In 2021, ADL tabulated 2,717 antisemitic incidents throughout the United States. This is a 34% increase from the 2,026 incidents tabulated in 2020 and the highest number on record since ADL began tracking antisemitic incidents in 1979.

Of the 2,717 incidents recorded in 2021, 1,776 were cases of harassment, a 43% increase from 1,242 in 2020, and 853 incidents were cases of vandalism, a 14% increase from 751 in 2020. The 88 incidents of antisemitic assault (a 167% increase from 33 in 2020), involved 131 victims; none of the assaults were deadly.

Meanwhile, last week B'nai B'rith Canada released its 2021 Audit of Antisemitic Incidents in Canada (full text). According to the report:

The 2021 numbers show an increase in antisemitic incidents, with an overall jump of 7.2% in comparison to 2020.

There were some changes in patterns. Covid quarantine restrictions including lockdowns appear to have caused the number of cases of in-person harassment to decline significantly. These cases dropped from 620 in 2020 to 367 in 2021 or a 40.8% decline. However, that lack of direct contact may have been a factor in the jump in cases of online hate.

In fact, online hate has become the preferred method of targeting Jews. B’nai Brith logged 2,093 incidents of online hate, or an increase of 12.3% over the 2020 figures of 1,863 cases....

According to the report, there were 75 incidents of antisemitic violence in 2021, compared to only 9 in 2020. Jewish News Syndicate reports on the Canadian audit. 

New Arizona Law Protects Right To Clergy Visits In Health Care Institutions

Arizona Governor Doug Ducey yesterday signed HB 2449 (full text) which protects the right of residents of assisted living, nursing and hospice facilities to receive visits by clergy even during states of emergency, as well as when a resident's death is imminent. ADF issued a press release on the bill.

USCIRF Issues 2022 Annual Report

Yesterday, the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom released its 2022 Annual Report (full text) which documents developments during 2021.  USCIRF issued a press release summarizing the 100-page report, saying in part:

USCIRF recommends 15 countries to the State Department for designation as “countries of particular concern” (CPCs) because their governments engage in or tolerate “systematic, ongoing, and egregious violations.” These include 10 that the State Department designated as CPCs in November 2021: Burma, China, Eritrea, Iran, North Korea, Pakistan, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Tajikistan, and Turkmenistan—as well as five others: Afghanistan, India, Nigeria, Syria, and Vietnam. For the first time ever, the State Department designated Russia as a CPC in 2021, which USCIRF had been recommending since 2017. Regrettably, the State Department removed Nigeria as a CPC....

The ... Report also recommends 12 countries for placement on the State Department’s Special Watch List (SWL) based on their governments’ perpetration or toleration of severe violations. These include three that the State Department placed on that list in November 2021: Algeria, Cuba, and Nicaragua—as well as nine others: Azerbaijan, CAR [Central African Republic], Egypt, Indonesia, Iraq, Kazakhstan, Malaysia, Turkey, and Uzbekistan....

The 2022 Annual Report further recommends to the State Department seven non-state actors for redesignation as “entities of particular concern” ... for systematic, ongoing, egregious violations...: al-Shabaab, Boko Haram, the Houthis, Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham ..., Islamic State in the Greater Sahara ..., Islamic State in West Africa Province ..., and Jamaat Nasr al-Islam wal Muslimin....

... The report also highlights [other] important global developments and trends related to religious freedom.... These include: the COVID-19 pandemic and religious freedom, blasphemy and hate speech law enforcement, transnational repression, religious intolerance in Europe, deteriorating religious freedom conditions in South Asia, and political upheaval that raises religious freedom concerns.

Waiver In Plea Agreement Precludes Appeal Of Ban On Possessing Antisemitic Material

In United States v. Holzer, (10th Cir., April 25, 2022), the U.S. 10th Circuit Court of Appeals held that the appellate waiver provision in defendant's plea agreement precludes him from appealing Special Condition Nine of his supervised release which he contends infringes his freedom of religion, thought and expression. The court explains:

Defendant Richard Holzer was arrested and criminally charged after federal undercover agents determined that Holzer had taken substantial steps towards bombing a synagogue in Pueblo, Colorado. Holzer subsequently pleaded guilty, pursuant to a written plea agreement, to one count of intentionally attempting to obstruct persons in the enjoyment of their free exercise of religious beliefs through force, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 247(a)(2) and (d)(3), and one count of maliciously attempting to damage and destroy, by means of fire and explosives, a synagogue, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 844(i). The district court sentenced Holzer to a term of imprisonment of 235 months, to be followed by a fifteen-year term of supervised release. The district court also ordered Holzer to comply with eleven special conditions of supervised release, including Special Condition Nine, that prohibits him from acquiring, possessing, or using any material depicting support for or association with antisemitism or white supremacy.

Marine With Religious Objections To COVID Vaccine Is Denied Preliminary Injunction

In Short v. Berger, (D AZ, April 22, 2022), an Arizona federal district court refused to grant a preliminary injunction to a Marine Corps major who was denied a religious exemption from the military's COVID vaccine mandate.  Plaintiff is serving as a staff judge advocate.  According to the court:

To date, the USMC has received over 3,600 requests for a religious exemption from the vaccine requirement but has approved only seven of those requests. It appears that, in all seven cases, the applicant was already in the process of separating from the Marines at the time the request was granted. In contrast, the USMC has approved over 900 medical exemptions, including at least 20 permanent medical exemptions.

The court went on:

In his motion for preliminary injunction, Major Short conspicuously does not assert that separation, loss of training and promotion opportunities, loss of pay, and/or a less-than-honorable discharge constitute irreparable injuries.... Instead, the sole theory of irreparable harm articulated in Major Short’s motion is that “being forced to choose between receiving the injection contrary to his religious beliefs, or defying an order, is itself a denial of free exercise, and directly causes irreparable harm.” ... [T]he tangible employment-related harms that Major Short may suffer ... do not qualify as irreparable under Ninth Circuit law because they can be remedied through retrospective relief....  

As for Major Short’s coercion theory, the Court acknowledges that, in many of the recent military vaccine challenges arising outside the Ninth Circuit, courts have suggested that a service member suffers an irreparable injury the moment he is forced to choose between following his religious beliefs and following an order to be vaccinated.... But however persuasive those cases might otherwise be, this Court must follow Ninth Circuit law and the Ninth Circuit has not adopted—and, indeed, appears to have rejected—this theory of irreparable harm....

The court also concluded that beyond the irreparable injury issue, there was uncertainty as to whether Plaintiff would succeed on his RFRA claim.