National Menorah Lighting Ceremony, With More Tension Than Usual

As reported by WTOP, yesterday in Washington, on the Ellipse near the White House, American Friends of Lubavitch sponsored the lighting of the National Menorah.  According to the Washington Examiner, the ceremony was more tense than usual. Representing the Obama Administration, Acting Treasury Undersecretary for Terrorism and Financial Intelligence Adam Szubin helped light the Menorah after remarks concluding with a hope "that our lights steadily increase, until the world is illuminated by a continual and unwavering light." But Rabbi Levi Shemtov representing the event sponsors used the theme of light to criticize the Obama Administration for its decision last week not to veto a U.N. Security Council resolution sharply criticizing Israel's settlement policies.  Shemtov said:

... [S]ome of us are so sad at what happened there with regard to Israel. We must remember that the way to counter any darkness, any disappointment is not with harsh rhetoric, not with anger, but when we create light, the darkness dissipates.

Meanwhile, the Smithsonian's SmartNews last week carried an interesting account of how the tradition of a national menorah began in 1979 when Abraham Shemtov pressed the idea:

... [T]he secretary of the interior initially denied him a permit to put a menorah on government property, on the grounds that it would violate the First Amendment.... What happened next was a classic piece of Washington insider work. Shemtov ... "called his friend Stu Eizenstat, an adviser to President Jimmy Carter.  Eizenstat gave the secretary a choice: Either approve the permit or deny the National Christmas Tree’s permit too. If he disobeyed, Eizenstat would take the matter straight to Carter, who would side with Eizenstat—a major embarrassment for the secretary."  Shemtov got the permit, and a tradition was born.

Cert Filed In RFRA Case Decided By Armed Forces Court of Appeals

On Dec. 23, a petition for certiorari (full text) was filed with the U.S. Supreme Court in United States v. Sterling.  In the case, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces held that a Marine Lance Corporal failed to establish a prima facie case under RFRA in defending against charges growing out of her work space posting of unauthorized signs containing Biblical quotations. (See prior posting.)  The petition for review by the Supreme Court frames the question presented as:

whether the existence of a forced choice between what religion and government command is necessary to establish a "substantial burden" under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.

Independent Journal Review reports on the filing of the cert. petition.

Recent Articles of Interest

From SSRN:

• Belinda Carpenter, Gordon Tait, Carol Quadrelli & Ian Thompson, Investigating Death: The Emotional and Cultural Challenges for Police, (Policing and Society, 26(6), pp. 698-712 (2015)).
• Neil James Foster, Churches and the Law of Sanctuary in Australia, (March 4, 2016).
• Neil James Foster, How Should Religious Marriage Celebrants Respond If Same Sex Marriage Is Introduced in Australia?, (September 25, 2015).
• Fabienne Bretscher, The Swiss Judiciary and International Human Rights Bodies: A Closer Look at Muslim Religious Practices in Public Schools, (June 14, 2016).
• Joel Nolette, Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt: Judicial Review When the Court Wants To, (Georgetown Journal of Law & Public Policy, Vol. 14, No. 2, 2016).
• Susan A. Bandes, Compassion and the Rule of Law, (International Journal of Law in Context vol. 13 issue 2 (2017 Forthcoming)).
• Eric Franklin, A More Charitable Charity: Administrative Necessity Provides an Opportunity to Promote Altruism in Charities, (December 14, 2016).

From SSRN (Islamic Law);

• Ibrahim Nuruddeen Muhammad, Waqf Based Philanthropy: A Definition and Obstacles to Waqf Knowledge Acquisition in North-Western Nigeria, (1st Kano Waqf International Conference (KWIC) (Dec. 2016).
• Sakirman MSI, Indonesia Islamic Law Study on Children Nasab,  (December 21, 2016).
• Avner M. Emon, Fiqh (A Historiography), (Fiqh: The Oxford Handbook of Islamic Law, Edited by Anver M. Emon and Rumee Ahmed (2016)).
• Avner M. Emon, Ijtihad, (Ijtihad: The Oxford Handbook of Islamic Law Edited by Anver M. Emon and Rumee Ahmed (2015).

From SmartCILP:

• Reza Afshari, LGBTs in the Islamic Republic of Iran. (Reviewing Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Rights in Iran: Analysis from Religious, Social, Legal and Cultural Perspectives, by the International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission), 38 Human Rights Quarterly 814-834 (2016).
• Nehaluddin Ahmad, Ahmad Masum & Abdul Mohaimin Ayus, Freedom of Religion and Apostasy: The Malaysian Experience, 38 Human Rights Quarterly 736-753 (2016).
• Jeffrey A. Herman, Resolving ERISA's "Church Plan" Problem, 31 A.B.A. Journal of Labor & Employment Law 231-256 (2016).
• B. Jessie Hill, The First Amendment and the Politics of Reproductive Health Care, 50 Washington University Journal of Law & Policy 103-122 (2016).

Court Upholds Vaccination Requirement For Paramedic Clinical Students

In George v. Kankakee Community College, 2016 Ill. App. Unpub. LEXIS 2760 (IL App., Dec.. 20, 2016), an Illinois state court of appeals upheld a hospital's policy requiring community college students enrolled in the clinical portion of the school's paramedic course at the hospital to receive various vaccinations.  Plaintiff Nicholas George asserted religious objections to the vaccines and argued that the religious freedom and equal protection provisions of the Illinois constitution required he be granted an exemption. The court disagreed, holding that the vaccination requirement is a neutral law of general application, and that the Illinois Constitution allows requirements that may restrict religious freedom in order to promote the safety of the citizens of the state. The court also rejected various other state law challenges.

Recent Prisoner Free Exercise Cases

In Ali v. Eckstein, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 175024 (ED WI, Dec. 19, 2016), a Wisconsin federal district court ordered a Muslim inmate who sued over his inability to sign up to participate in Ramadan to file an amended complaint curing pleading deficiencies.

In Harvey v. Gonzalez, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 175793 (D CO, Dec. 20, 2016), a Colorado federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendation (2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 175796, Nov. 21, 2016) and dismissed as moot a Muslim inmate's complaint about confiscation of his Qur'an and his inability to obtain a replacement.

In Carawan v. Mitchell, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 175858 (WD NC, Dec. 20, 2016), a North Carolina federal district court permitted a Muslim inmate to move ahead with his complaint that he was forced to choose between attending class to earn gain-time credits and attending Muslim worship services held at the same time.

In Husband v. Dougherty, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 175890 (D AZ, Dec. 19, 2016), an Arizona federal district court dismissed an inmate's claim that his access to the grievance process was blocked because of his religion.

In Baines v. Hicks, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 176116 (ED VA, Dec. 19, 2016), a Virginia federal district court dismissed a Muslim inmate's complaint regarding removal from the common fare diet and pressure to consume food from the common fare diet that did not meet his religious dietary requirements.

In Walters v. Livingston, 2016 Tex. App. LEXIS 13507 (TX App., Dec. 21, 2016), a Texas state appeals court held that a provision in the state's Religious Freedom Restoration Act that bars a person filing suit if the burden on religious exercise has been cured does not allow the state to avoid liability by curing a burden once the suit has been filed. Here the suit was by a Native American inmate.

In Pigues v. Solano County Jail, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 176910 (ED CA, Dec. 21, 2016), a California federal magistrate judge recommended dismissal of a suit by a Jehovah's Witness inmate complaining that correctional officers confiscated two religious drawings they thought to be gang related.

In Villalobos v. Bosenko, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 176924 (ED CA, Dec. 20, 2016), a California federal magistrate judge dismissed a complaint by an inmate who was a recent convert to Buddhism that he was denied a religiously compliant vegetarian diet that could have been served by combining elements of existing diets available to inmates.

In Stathum v. Nadrowski, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 177492 (D NJ, Dec. 22, 2016), a New Jersey federal district court allowed a Muslim inmate to proceed with his equal protection challenge, but not his free exercise challenge, to requiring him to accept vegetarian meals to satisfy his religious dietary needs instead of kosher meals that were available to Jewish inmates.

Obamas Wish Americans Merry Christmas

In his Weekly Address, posted as a video on the White House website, President Obama and First Lady Michelle Obama wished all Americans a Merry Christmas. In his address, the President briefly reviewed the accomplishments of his Administration. They also recognized Americans in military service.

Settlement Reached In Dispute Over Muslim Cemetery

The town of Dudley, Massachusetts has reached an agreement to settle a suit brought by the Islamic Society of Greater Worcester that will allow a Muslim cemetery to be located in the town. Initial denial of permits led to widely publicized charges of religious discrimination.  The Boston Globe reports:

The settlement, approved Thursday evening by the Dudley Board of Selectmen, should result in an initial 6-acre cemetery on 55 acres of former farmland that would provide enough graves for “several generations of families of the Islamic Society of Greater Worcester,” said Jay Talerman, ... a lawyer for the Islamic Society. Along with some wetlands, the site also contains about another 6 acres that would be suitable for cemetery plots, but under the deal the Islamic Society agrees not to seek to expand the initial cemetery for at least a decade, he said....

Under the new settlement, the cemetery project will come back before the Dudley Zoning Board of Appeals, where “we’ve agreed there will be a special permit granted on mutually agreeable conditions,” [John] Davis [the town's counsel] said. The project will then be reviewed by the Board of Health, and, if plans affect wetlands, by the Conservation Commission...

DHS Removes NSEER Rules, Making Any Muslim Registry Program By Trump More Difficult

Yesterday the Department of Homeland Security issued a release (full text) removing regulations relating to the  National Security Entry-Exit Registration System (NSEERS).  As reported by Vox, in 2011 President Obama had suspended the program, which targeted Muslims, by removing all countries from the list of those to whom the registration requirements apply. The program as it operated after 9-11 required males on non-immigrant visas who are 16 years old or older from 25 countries-- 24 of them Muslim countries-- to register.  The much-criticized program led to 13,000 deportations. Yesterday's action completely removes the regulations.  The Department of Homeland Security, finding that the data captured under SEERS is now available through other means, concluded that the removal of the old rules is merely procedural to delete "regulations related to an outdated, inefficient, and decommissioned program."  DHS was thus able to delete the old rules without going through the notice and comment requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act by invoking the exception for "rules of agency organization, procedure, or practice."

The action, effective with publication in today's Federal Register, means that the incoming Trump Administration, which has variously called for registration of Muslim immigrants, or those entering the U.S. from Muslim countries, will need to go through the full Administrative Procedure Act notice-and-comment requirements to implement a registration system. It will not be able to just reinvigorate SEERS. New York Times also reports on the action by DHS.

2016 Law and Religion Bibliography Published By AALS Section

The Association of American Law Schools Law & Religion Section has issued its Winter 2016 Newsletter which includes an extensive bibliography of books and articles on law and religion published during the past year.  It also includes news about the AALS section and its members.

Catholic Health Educator Files EEOC Complaint

A First Liberty Institute press release announced the filing on Dec. 21 of an EEOC complaint (full text) on behalf of Alexia Palma, a health educator at Legacy Community Health, a Texas clinic for low income patients.  The complaint charges refusal by new management to continue to accommodate Palma's Catholic religious beliefs. New management refused to allow her, in the family planning class she sometimes taught, to show a video giving information on contraceptive methods instead of personally teaching the material.  She was told she must put aside her religious beliefs. Washington Post reports on the case.

North Carolina's Attempt To Repeal "Bathroom Bill" Fails

As reported by the Washington Post, yesterday's special session of the North Carolina legislature that had been called to repeal the state's controversial anti-transgender "bathroom bill" was unsuccessful in doing so.  It appeared that a compromise had been worked out to repeal the law that prevents transgender individuals from using school and government office building restrooms that match their gender identity. (See prior posting.)  The city of Charlotte repealed its local non-discrimination ordinance that had triggered the state legislature's action.  However, the state repeal bill introduced in the legislature included a six-month moratorium on any city enacting a nondiscrimination ordinance to protect LGBT rights.  That limit was unacceptable to Democrats in the legislature.  Senate President Pro Tempore Phil Berger blamed the failure of the repeal on the Democrats, saying:

Their action proves they only wanted a repeal in order to force radical social engineering and shared bathrooms across North Carolina, at the expense of our state’s families, our reputation and our economy.

Preliminary Injunction Issued Against Illinois Conscience Act Amendments

In Pregnancy Care Center of Rockford, Inc. v. Rauner, (IL Cir. Ct., Dec. 20, 2016), an Illinois state trial court granted a preliminary injunction preventing enforcement against conscientious objectors of recently enacted amendments to the Illinois Healthcare Right of Conscience Act.  According to the court:

While the Conscience Act allows medical care providers to decline to participate in medical procedures to which they have moral objections, the amendments to the Act ... require providers to provide information and referral assistance with respect to a patient's "legal treatment options" as a precondition to invoking the Act's protections.

Invoking intermediate scrutiny of regulation of "professional speech" under the Illinois constitution, the court said that the legislature has imposed an obligation to furnish information only on conscientious objectors.  It goes on:

The Court concludes that plaintiffs have raised a "fair question" about whether SB 1564 unnecessarily burdens their right to be free from government compelled speech to a degree more than necessary to serve the state's interest in educating patients.

CatholicCitizens.org provides a lengthier analysis of the decision.

Suit Challenges College's Speech Zones and Speech Code

A student at Georgia Gwinnett College has filed suit in federal district court challenging the school's Speech Zone and Speech Code Policies. The 76-page complaint (full text) in Uzuegbunam v. Preczewski, (ND GA, filed 12/19/2016), says that plaintiff was stopped from distributing religious literature on campus when he was outside two small designated speech zones, and that when he tried to share his religious views in one of the designated speech zones he was told that his speech constituted disorderly conduct because it had generated complaints. Plaintiff asks for a declaratory judgment and injunction finding that the speech policies violate his free speech, free exercise, equal protection and due process rights. The Daily Signal reports on the lawsuit.

Removal of Secular "Nativity Scene" May Be Viewpoint Discrimination

In Freedom From Religion Foundation v. Abbott, (WD TX, Dec. 20, 2016), a Texas federal district court allowed plaintiff to move ahead with one aspect of its free speech claim in its challenge to the Texas governor's order removing from the Texas State Capitol exhibition area plaintiff's Bill of Rights "Nativity Scene." The display was accompanied by a banner that focuses on the Winter Solstice and separation of church and state.  The Texas State Preservation Board originally approved the display, but Texas Gov. Greg Abbott who is executive director of the Board instructed that it be taken down.  He contended that the display did not meet the requirement of promoting a "public purpose." The court held:

In this case, a genuine issue of material fact exists as to whether Defendants' decision to remove FFRF's exhibit constitutes viewpoint discrimination.

Plaintiff's other 1st and 14th Amendment challenges were dismissed. Dallas News reports on the decision.

Amicus Says Trademark Case Impacts Religious Speech

Next month, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Lee v. Tam (SCOTUSblog case page).  The case involves a free speech challenge to the Lanham Act which allows the government to deny trademark registration to a mark "which may disparage * * * persons, living or dead, institutions, beliefs,
or national symbols, or bring them into contempt, or disrepute." On Monday the Becket Fund filed an amicus brief in the case focusing on the impact of the disparagement clause on religious speech. The brief argued in part:

Disagreements about deeply important issues such as religion can often be experienced as disparaging.... [I]t would be wrong for the government to punish speech simply because it wants to protect some religious “institutions” and “beliefs” from criticism.

In fact, to its credit, the United States has for many decades led the fight to convince other countries and international bodies to allow disparaging speech, and to resist using the law to punish those who disparage religion or commit blasphemy.

Slovakian President Vetoes Anti-Muslim Bill; Override Expected

AFP reports that in Slovakia yesterday, President Andrej Kiska vetoed as "discriminatory" a bill that would make it more difficult for Muslims and other religious minorities to receive government subsidies.  Currently under Slovakian law, a religion must have at least 20,000 followers in the country in order to qualify for subsidies.  The bill that was passed by the National Council (the Parliament) would increase that number to 50,000.  Some 2,000 to 5,000 Muslims currently live in Slovakia, whose total population is 5.4 million. It is expected that the National Council will override the President's veto after Prime Minister Robert Fico told reporters, "While I am prime minister, I will never agree to establish a unified Muslim community in Slovakia."

Israeli Rabbi Tells Jewish Students At The Technion To Avoid Christmas Tree

As reported yesterday by Arutz Sheva and Haaretz, in Israel, the rabbi of the renowned university the Technion has created a furor by telling Jewish students that they should not enter the Student Union because of a Christmas tree that is being displayed there. Rabbi Elad Dokow wrote:

The Christmas tree is a religious symbol – not Christian, but even more problematic – pagan. Halakha [Jewish religious law] clearly states that whenever it is possible to circumvent and not pass through a place where there is any kind of idolatry, this must be done. So one should not enter the student union if it's not necessary to do so. 

The Technion-- an over 100-year old research university-- which prides itself on welcoming students of all religions and communities rejected Dokow's views, saying that it is determined to continue being an example of tolerance and coexistence.

England's Charity Commission Refuses To Register Jedi Order As A Religion

Last week, the Charity Commission for England and Wales rejected an application by the Temple of the Jedi Order (TOTJO)-- an organization whose doctrines are inspired by Star Wars-- to be entered onto the register of charities. (Full text of Commission's Dec. 16 ruling.) TOTJO claimed that its purpose is: "To advance the religion of Jediism, for the public benefit worldwide, in accordance with the Jedi Doctrine." The ruling says in part:

... [R]eligion in charity law is characterised by belief in one or more gods or spiritual or non-secular principles or things, and a relationship between the adherents of the religion and the gods, principles or things which is expressed by worship, reverence and adoration, veneration intercession or by some other religious rite or service. In addition, that it must be capable of providing moral and ethical value or edification to the public and characterised by a certain level of cogency, seriousness, cohesion and importance.

... The Commission has ... concluded that Jediism does not meet the characteristics of a religion for the purposes of charity law....

The Commission also rejected the argument that TOTJO should be listed as a charity under the promotion of moral or ethical improvement standard. The Guardian reports on the ruling.

USCIRF Appoints Singshinsuk As Executive Director

The U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom announced yesterday that  Erin D. Singshinsuk, who has served since September as the Commission's Acting Executive Director has now been named Executive Director. According to the press release:

Ms. Singshinsuk has over 25 years of experience managing and working directly in support of federal commissions.  She has been affiliated with numerous organizations with an international focus, including the U.S. Institute of Peace (USIP) where she served as the Vice President for Management and the Chief Financial Officer.

Where Will Ivanka and Her Husband Pray?

Politico reported yesterday on the speculation swirling in Washington over which Orthodox synagogue "first-daughter" Ivanka Trump and  her husband Jared Kushner will make their religious home.  Many are suggesting that Georgetown's Kesher Israel is a front-runner.  Meanwhile The Forward speculates that the couple might opt for a private synagogue, or build a private one of their own, saying: "In-house worship spaces are a hot commodity for the observant wealthy."