Court Holds Title VII Applies To Sexual Orientation Discrmination

In U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Scott Medical Health Center, (WD PA, Nov. 4, 2016), a Pennsylvania federal district court held that Title VII's ban on discrimination because of sex prohibits discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation.  The court said in part:

That someone can be subjected to a barrage of insults, humiliation, hostility and/or changes to the terms and conditions of their employment, based upon nothing more than the aggressor’s view of what it means to be a man or a woman, is exactly the evil Title VII was designed to eradicate. Because this Court concludes that discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation is a subset of sexual stereotyping and thus covered by Title VII’s prohibitions on discrimination “because of sex"....

An EEOC press release discusses the decision.

British Court Says Sex Segregated Religious Schools OK Under Equality Act

In Interim Executive Board of X School v Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services And Skills, (EWHC (Admin), Nov. 8. 2016), a British trial court held that sex-segregated classes from the 5th grade on in an Islamic school do not violate the Equality Act 2010. In reaching its conclusion, the court distinguished U.S. Supreme Court case of Brown v. Board of Education. The High Court judge said in part:

The essence of her case is that "making separate but equal provisions for boys and girls (or blacks and whites, or heterosexuals and lesbians and gay men etc.) cannot be divorced from the historic and current societal treatment of the less powerful group." Put another way, but to the same effect, segregation has the tendency to promote social and cultural stereotypes about the role of women in society....

Insofar as segregation on the ground of sex is practised in mixed schools in the UK, it is a practice carried out by a minority of schools with a Jewish, Christian and Islamic ethos, with the full participation of parents.

In short, segregation in mixed schools in this country is not the practice of government; it cannot be envisaged as any reflection of the mores and attitudes of wider society; it is only capable of being seen as a reflection of the mores, attitudes, cultures and practices of the faith groups who have been permitted to do it.

Law & Religion UK has more on the case.

Suit Challenging Social Media Policing of Anti-Islamist Posts Is Dismissed

In American Freedom Defense Initiative v. Lynch, (D DC, Nov. 9, 2016), the DC. federal district court dismissed a suit against the federal government by two anti-Islamist organizations and their leaders, including well-known activist Pamela Geller.  The groups complain that Facebook, YouTube, and Twitter have repeatedly removed their postings.  They sue the U.S. Attorney General seeking a declaratory judgment that Sec. 230 of the Communications Decency Act is unconstitutional.  That section protects social media sites from liability for policing content to remove objectionable material.  Plaintiffs contend that if Sec. 230 were held unconstitutional, the sites would no longer censor their posts.  The court dismissed for lack of standing, holding that any impact of a declaratory judgment here is speculative, and at most would only indirectly affect the behavior of social media companies.

2015 Hate Crime Data Released

Yesterday, the FBI released its report on Hate Crime Statistics 2015. The ADL which follows hate crime data closely has compiled a summary of the new report's findings and of changes from 2014:

Reported hate crime incidents increased seven percent – from 5,479 to 5,850.

Religion-based crimes increased twenty-three percent, from 1,014 in 2014 to 1,244 in 2015.  Crimes directed against Jews increased nine percent; 53 percent of the total number of reported religion-based crimes were directed against Jews and Jewish institutions.

Reported crimes against Muslims increased 67 percent, from 154 in 2014 to 257 in 2015.  257 anti-Muslim hate crimes is the second most reported against Muslims ever – second only to the backlash crimes in 2001, after the 9/11 terrorist incidents.

In 2015, crimes directed against LGBT people increased almost four percent, from 1,017 to 1,053 – and, in just the third year of data collection on crimes directed against individuals on the basis of their gender identity, the numbers increased from 98 in 2014 to 114 in 2015 – now almost two percent of all hate crimes.

14, 997 law enforcement agencies in the United States participated in the 2015 data collection effort – a decrease from 15,494 participating agencies in 2014.....  88 percent of all participating police agencies affirmatively reported zero (0) hate crimes to the FBI (including at least 66 cities over 100,000)....

There were 18 hate crime murders reported in 2015, the most since 1994, and the second most over all 25 years of data collection.

... [T]his is the first year for anti-Sikh, anti-Hindu, and anti-Arab hate crimes (anti-Mormon and anti-Eastern Orthodox and other religious denominations, too.  The anti-Eastern Orthodox crimes were the largest reported in this new category – 48 in 2015)....

[Thanks to Michael Lieberman for the ADL data.]

Supreme Court Denies Review In Prof's Religious Speech Case

The U.S. Supreme Court today denied certiorari in Payne v. University of Southern Mississippi, (Docket No. 16-290, cert. denied 11/14/2016) (Order List).  In the case, a Mississippi federal district court held that the 1st Amendment does not preclude a faculty member at a public university being disciplined for religious speech made as part of his duties as a professor. (See prior posting.) The decision was affirmed at 643 Fed. Appx. 409 (5th Cir., April 12, 2016).

Donald Trump On His SCOTUS Appointment, Abortion Rights and Marriage Equality

Last night, CBS' "60 Minutes" broadcast an hour-long interview (full text and video) by Leslie Stahl with President-elect Donald Trump and with members of his family. Portions of the interview dealt with the impact of his Supreme Court nomination on abortion rights and marriage equality. Here are excerpts from the interview:

Lesley Stahl: One of the things you’re going to obviously get an opportunity to do, is name someone to the Supreme Court. And I assume you’ll do that quickly?

Donald Trump: Yes. Very important.

Lesley Stahl: During the campaign, you said that you would appoint justices who were against abortion rights. Will you appoint-- are you looking to appoint a justice who wants to overturn Roe v. Wade?

Donald Trump: So look, here’s what’s going to happen-- I’m going to-- I’m pro-life. The judges will be pro-life. They’ll be very—

Lesley Stahl: But what about overturning this law--

Donald Trump: Well, there are a couple of things. They’ll be pro-life, they’ll be-- in terms of the whole gun situation, we know the Second Amendment and everybody’s talking about the Second Amendment and they’re trying to dice it up and change it, they’re going to be very pro-Second Amendment. But having to do with abortion if it ever were overturned, it would go back to the states. So it would go back to the states and--

Lesley Stahl: Yeah, but then some women won’t be able to get an abortion?

Donald Trump: No, it’ll go back to the states.

Lesley Stahl: By state—no some --

 Donald Trump: Yeah.

Donald Trump: Yeah, well, they’ll perhaps have to go, they’ll have to go to another state.

Lesley Stahl: And that’s OK?

Donald Trump: Well, we’ll see what happens. It’s got a long way to go, just so you understand. That has a long, long way to go....

***

Lesley Stahl: Well, I guess the issue for [the LGBTQ community] is marriage equality. Do you support marriage equality?

Donald Trump: It-- it’s irrelevant because it was already settled. It’s law. It was settled in the Supreme Court. I mean it’s done.

Lesley Stahl: So even if you appoint a judge that--

Donald Trump: It’s done. It-- you have-- these cases have gone to the Supreme Court. They’ve been settled. And, I’m fine with that.

Recent Articles of Interest

From SSRN:

• Steven Douglas Smith, Naturalism and the Trajectory of History, (San Diego Legal Studies Paper No. 16-229 (2015)).
• Charles J. Reid, Same Sex Unions and the Catholic Church: How Law and Doctrine Evolve, (U of St. Thomas (Minnesota) Legal Studies Research Paper No. 16-27, 2016).
• Rinie Steinmann, The Core Meaning of Human Dignity, (Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, Vol. 19, 2016).
• Choice Ubangha, Hate Speech in Cyberspace: Why Education is Better than Regulation, (April 12, 2016).
• Robert J. Delahunty, An Epitaph for ISIS? The Idea of a Caliphate and the Westphalian Order, (U of St. Thomas (Minnesota) Legal Studies Research Paper No. 16-25, 2016).

Church Entitled To Hearing On Religious Liberty Defense To Day Care Licensing

In Our Lady of Victory Catholic Church v. Department of Human Services, (PA Commonw. Ct., Oct. 31, 2016), a 3-judge panel of the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court held that the Pennsylvania Department of Human Services has authority to issue cease and desist orders to enforce its regulations requiring any daycare center that cares for seven or more children to obtain a certificate of compliance.  However the court remanded for an evidentiary hearing the church's claim that requiring a certificate of compliance for its preschool (which it claims is part of its religious ministry) infringes its free exercise rights under the federal and state constitutions and under Pennsylvania's Religious Freedom Protection Act.  The Legal Intelligencer reports on the decision.

Recent Prisoner Free Exercise Cases

In Omaro v. O'Connell, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 153846 (WD NY, Nov. 4, 2016), a New York federal district court granted summary judgment to a Muslim inmate, finding that his free exercise rights were infringed when he was wrongly removed from the Ramadan call out meal schedule. The court referred the case to a magistrate judge for a settlement conference on damages.  The court dismissed plaintiff's equal protection challenge.

In Holmes v. Engleson, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 155201 (ND IL, Nov. 9, 2016), an Illinois federal district court refused to dismiss an inmate's complaint that his dreadlocks and beard that he wore for religious reasons were shaved against his will.

In Simmons v. Hulette, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 155721 (ND CA, Nov. 9, 2016), a California federal magistrate judge dismissed with leave to amend an inmate's complaint that he has been denied a traditional Lakota Inipi Purification Ceremony, access to a drum circle and talking circle, medicine and materials for ceremonies and a competent spiritual adviser.

In Cooper v. Bower, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 155988 (WD KY, Nov. 9, 2016), a Kentucky federal district court allowed an inmate to move ahead with his complaint that he was not allowed to receive a copy of the Qur'an that had been purchased for him by a relative instead of from funds in his inmate account.

In Yaacov v. Mohr, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 156199 (ND OH, Nov. 10, 2016), an Ohio federal district court dismissed a Jewish inmate's complaint that he is unable to obtain kosher vegan meals.

In Parkerson v. Ferns, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 156210 (D OR, Nov. 10, 2016), an Oregon federal district court dismissed for failure to exhaust administrative remedies and inmate's complaint that he was suspended from receiving kosher meals because he ate non-kosher food from the commissary as well.

In Tilmon v. Keith, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 156512 (WD LA, Sept. 14, 2016), a Louisiana federal magistrate judge dismissed a Muslim inmate's complaint that in 2012 he was unable to observe Eid ul Adha. However he was permitted to proceed with his claim that unwanted exposure to second-hand tobacco smoke and synthetic marijuana smoke interfered with his ability to pray.

Muslim Nanny Sues Actor Couple

According to The Wrap, in a suit filed in Los Angeles Superior Court on Thursday, Sarah Alaseri (a young Muslim woman) is seeking damages for religious discrimination (as well as sexual harassment) against actor Steve Howey and his wife Sarah Shahi.  Alaseri was employed by the couple as a nanny. The suit claims that Howey and Shahi ridiculed Alaseri's religious beliefa and practices-- including mocking her for dressing modestly, fasting and wearing a headscarf when praying.

More On Presidential Voting By Religious Groupings

Earlier this week, the Pew Research Center, using exit polls, published How the faithful voted: A preliminary 2016 analysis.  It breaks down the vote in last Tuesday's Presidential election by faith group.  The group giving Donald Trump the largest percentage-- 81%-- of their vote were described in the survey as "White born-again/ evangelical Christians". The category overlaps some of the other categories reported: Protestant/ other Christian- 58%; White Catholic- 60%. Groups giving Trump the lowest percentage of their votes were: Jewish- 24%; Hispanic Catholic- 26%; Religiously unaffiliated- 26%.

In the same vein, yesterday the New York Times posted an article titled Religious Right Believes Donald Trump Will Deliver on His Promises, saying in part:

Now that he has won, evangelical leaders say they are confident Mr. Trump will deliver on the political promises he made to them. These include appointing a conservative to the Supreme Court, defunding Planned Parenthood, protecting businesses that refuse to provide services for same-sex weddings and rescinding the mandate in the Affordable Care Act that requires insurance coverage for birth control.

And with Gov. Mike Pence of Indiana, an evangelical with a record of legislating against abortion and same-sex marriage, as vice president, Christian leaders say they feel reassured they will have access to the White House and a seat at the table.

U.S. Muslim Leaders Urge Messages of Hope At Friday Prayers

A press release yesterday from CAIR urged Muslim prayer leaders and imams to address post-presidential election anxieties in sermons during their regular Friday prayer services today. An outline of talking points for leaders prepared by Sh. Omar Suleiman, president of the Yaqeen Institute for Islamic Research in Texas, was included. Here are some excerpts:

We have to come to terms with the idea that will be faced with some level of hardship with our faith regardless of the circumstances. Part of ending harm towards the community collectively is individually being ready to dispel stereotypes. In Makkah, the public display of the faith was the protest of the Companions. We must also continue to publicly be unapologetically Muslim....

It’s very easy for us to say that they all hate us, and there is no good left in the people. Instead let us remind ourselves that the Prophet (peace be upon him) prayed for the people most sincerely when their rejection for him was most severe. He prayed for them at Ta’if when they struck him in the face, and at Uhud when they almost killed him....

The under 25 voters were almost unanimous in expressing what type of America they wanted to live in. And it is not one of bigotry or xenophobia. We have to make sure we continue to invest in the younger generation so that they don’t repeat the mistakes of the past (and in this case, the present). We must continue to build institutions that will stand for justice and peace for generations to come. The Day of Judgment has not come yet, and even if it had, we would still be required to finish planting what is in our hands.

Suit Challenges University's Service Learning Requirements

A suit filed yesterday in a Wisconsin federal district court challenges the constitutionality of the University of Wisconsin, Eau Claire's service learning program.  All students must complete 30 hours of community service in order to graduate; however activities that directly involve promoting religious doctrine, proselytizing, or worship are not eligible for credit. The complaint (full text) in Liebl v. Schmidt, (WD WI, filed 11/10/2016), alleges that the two students who are bringing suit were not allowed to count time teaching religious education classes to children as community service, while students could receive service-learning credit for a variety of activities that involve non-religious instruction or non-religious persuasion and recruitment. The suit alleges that this policy violates plaintiffs' 1st and 14th Amendment rights. ADF issued a press release announcing the filing of the lawsuit.

Chabad Files RLUIPA Lawsuit In New Jersey Town

North Jersey.com reports on a RLUIPA lawsuit filed Nov. 1 by an Orthodox Jewish Chabad group against the mayor, property maintenance officer and Zoning Board of Adjustment of Woodcliff Lake, New Jersey. The suit challenges denials of variances and waivers by the zoning board which Chabad sought in order to build a house of worship on its property. According to the report:

The lawsuit ... allege[s] that the congregation has been the victim of a "targeted effort" to block them from developing a house of worship in Woodcliff Lake - something that the congregation alleges has caused "unjustified fear" and "prejudice" of Orthodox Jews. Chabad also alleges that Mayor Carlos Rendo made various statements that Chabad was attempting to "turn the borough into a little Jerusalem" and that the "town will be littered with black hats walking the town on Saturdays," (a reference to Hassidic Orthodox Jews.)

10th Circuit: Ten Commandments Monument Violates Establishment Clause

In Felix v. City of Bloomfield, (10th Cir., Nov. 9, 2016), the U.S. 10th Circuit Court of Appeals agreed with the district court (see prior posting) that a Ten Commandments monument erected by a former city councilman on the Bloomfield, New Mexico city hall lawn violates the Establishment Clause. Among other things, the court held that plaintiffs who are polytheistic Wiccans demonstrated sufficient injury to have standing even though they only saw the monument and never read the text on it. The court went on to hold:

The apparent purpose and context of the Monument’s installation would give an objective observer the impression of official religious endorsement. In arriving at this conclusion, we examine the text of the Monument, its placement on the lawn, the circumstances of its financing and installation, and the timing of this litigation.

It held that disclaimers on and around the monument failed to "negate the more powerful statement of endorsement conveyed by a decision to place the Monument on government land." Nor did the later addition of a number of secular monuments cure the violation.

Down-Ballot Results of Interest

In a pre-election post I identified several down-ballot contests that were of interest to those following religious issues. Here are the results from yesterday in those contests:

1. Oklahoma Question 790 that would have amended the state constitution to eliminate the ban on use of public funds to support religious institutions was defeated-- 43% yes and 57% no.
2. Missouri Constitutional Amendment 3 that would have imposed a cigarette tax to fund early childhood initiatives and would have exempted grants in the program from the ban on use of funds to support religious entities was defeated 59% to 41%.
3. Montana Supreme Court candidate Kristen Juras whose conservative Christian religious beliefs became a campaign issue was defeated 56% to 44%.
4. Ohio District 37 state legislature candidate Casey Weinstein sho had been a plaintiff in a suit against the U.S. Air Force Academy alleging Christian proselytizing lost 57% to 43%.
5. In Missouri, Republican Attorney General candidate Josh Hawley who disagrees with the state's position in the Trinity Lutheran case now before the U.S. Supreme Court in which the state denied a playground grant to a church on state constitutional grounds won 59% to 41%.

Some Early Press Reactions To Trump's Surprise Victory

For Religion Clause readers, here are some early press reactions to Donald Trump's unexpected win in yesterday's presidential election that may be of interest:

• Evangelicals Hand Victory To Donald Trump (Christianity Today).
• Trump's Win, the Greatest Victory for anti-Semitism in America Since 1941 (Haaretz).
• Mixed reaction to Trump from prominent Muslim Americans (AlJazeera).
• Vatican prays Trump presidency will promote peace amid conflict (Catholic News Agency).
• The End of Roe v. Wade Is Now a Real Possibility (Cosmopolitan).

Priest's Anti-Abortion Video Raises Questions On Limits For Advocacy

On Sunday just ahead of Tuesday's presidential election, Rev. Frank Pavone, national director of the activist anti-abortion group Priests for Life, posted a live video on Facebook which, as reported by the Washington Post, "raised questions for some about what is appropriate antiabortion and political activism in the church."  The video in which Pavone endorsed Donald Trump for president because of the anti-abortion Republican platform showed an actual aborted fetus on the altar. Pavone said the fetus was given to him for burial by a pathologist. In a post on the blog of the Archdiocese of New York, a spokesman strongly criticized Pavone, saying in part:

A human being has been sacrificed and the altar of God has been desecrated, all for politics. Everyone who respects the dignity of every human person should reject and disavow this atrocity.

A post on Friendly Atheist blog includes a link to Pavone's full 44 minute video.

Another Court Challenge To HHS Rules On Medical Services For Transgender Individuals

Following on a lawsuit filed in August (see prior posting), yesterday a lawsuit was filed by different plaintiffs challenging new rules (full text) adopted by the Department of Health and Human Services in May.  The rules bar discrimination on the basis of gender identity in the delivery of medical services by, among others, health facilities receiving federal financial assistance.  The complaint (full text) in Religious Sisters of Mercy v. Burwell, (D ND, filed 11/7/2016), filed by a religious order, a health care system, a Catholic university with a nursing program, and the state of North Dakota, alleges that the new rules violate various statutory and constitutional provisions. It says in part:

The Regulation not only forces healthcare professionals to violate their medical judgment, it also forces them to violate their deeply held religious beliefs.... The Regulation also undermines the longstanding sovereign power of States such as North Dakota to regulate healthcare, ensure appropriate standards of medical judgment, and protect its citizens’ constitutional and civil rights.

Becket Fund issued a press release announcing the filing of the lawsuit.

Religion Clause Feed On Social Media Is Back

To Readers Who Follow Religion Clause on Twitter, Facebook or Google+--

I discovered only today that the company providing automatic posting of Religion Clause feed to various social media sites closed its doors on Nov. 1 without sending me notice. (I guess that's what happens when one uses free online providers :).)  I now have a new provider so that Religion Clause is back on social media.

Some Issues of Religion In Tomorrow's Down-Ballot Contests

Religion has not dominated very many down-ballot contests in tomorrow's election.  However for those interested in religious liberty and church-state issues, there are several contests to watch. [Thanks to Don Byrd at Blog From the Capital for keeping an eye on these down ballot issues.]

1. Oklahoma State Question 790 asks voters to repeal provisions in Oklahoma's state constitution (Art. 2, Sec. 5) that prohibits the use of public funds or property for the direct or indirect benefit of any religion or religious institution.  This section of the state constitution was the basis for the Oklahoma Supreme Court to order removal of a Ten Commandments monument.
   
2. Missouri Constitutional Amendment 3 would increase the tax on cigarettes to create an Early Childhood Health and Education Trust Fund that will make grants to both public and private entities.  Part of the amendment excludes grant funds distributed from the Trust Fund from the restrictions of Missouri Constitution Art. IX, Sec. 8 which prohibits use of public funds to support any religious creed, sectarian purpose or religious educational institution. The proposed Amendment also bars use of trust funds for any abortion services not necessary to save the life of the mother.
   
3. The conservative Christian religious beliefs of one of the candidates for Justice of the Montana Supreme Court-- attorney and law professor Kristen Juras-- has become a campaign issue. (See prior posting.)
   
4. In a contest for state legislature in Ohio, Casey Weinstein who is running in House District 37 (Summit County), has been challenged over a lawsuit filed on his behalf when he was an Air Force Academy cadet. According to the Cleveland Plain Dealer, an ad sent out by state Republican Party focuses on a lawsuit in which Weinstein was one of the plaintiffs objecting to alleged Christian proselytizing at the Air Force Academy. Weinstein's father Mikey Weinstein is head of the Military Religious Freedom Foundation that filed the suit.
   
5. The result of the state Attorney General contest in Missouri may impact a major free exercise case currently before the U.S. Supreme Court-- Trinity Lutheran Church v. Pauley. At issue is the denial-- because of Missouri's Blaine Amendment-- of a state Playground Scrap Tire Surface Material Grant that would have allowed a church to resurface a playground at its day care and preschool facility. The state, represented by the current Democratic state Attorney General Chris Koster (who is now a candidate for governor), is defending the denial. However Republican Attorney General candidate Josh Hawley sides with the church and filed an amicus brief in support of of it on behalf of a Pentecostal Christian denomination. (US Law Week, Nov. 2, reports).

Watching Tomorrow's Presidential Election Results Through Denominational Lenses

For election watchers who are also concerned about religious issues, the results of tomorrow's Presidential contest will provide interesting glimpses into the reactions of several religious groups to each of the candidates.  Here are trends to watch:

1. Evangelical Christians have been divided over supporting Donald Trump, with some supporting him and others part of the "never Trump" movement (see Washington Times, Nov. 6). Trump has emphasized his support for repeal of the Johnson Amendment that bars campaigning by religious non-profits, and the pro-life views of individuals he will nominate to the Supreme Court. (Christian Post, Nov. 4).
2. Muslim Americans have been rattled by rhetoric from Donald Trump that is perceived to be anti-Muslim.  Voting participation is likely to be high among American Muslims. (see AlJazeera's Nov. 6 report on voting in Dearborn, Michigan).
3. Many Mormons in America are uneasy with Donald Trump's policies and his personal rectitude.  This has made third party candidate Evan McMullin, who is a Mormon (and whose running mate Mindy Finn is Jewish), a viable contender in Utah. (Salon, Oct. 14).
4. Many Jewish Americans are alarmed by the anti-Semitism disseminated by some Trump followers and the alleged anti-Semitic "dog-whistles" in Trump's own campaign statements and ads. (Nov. 6 CBS News report).  However others in the Jewish community believe that Trump will be a stronger supporter of Israel, or at least of Israel's current government policies. (Op Ed Nov. 7 from The Forward).  Also it has not gone unnoticed by the Jewish community that both Chelsea Clinton and Ivanka Trump are married to Jewish husbands. (Ivanka has converted to Judaism). (Oct. 2 JTA article).
5. Conservative Catholics were offended by an e-mail exchange between Clinton Campaign Chairman John Podesta, his Communications Director Jennifer Palmieri and supporter John Halpin. The e-mail was disclosed by Wikileaks. (Oct. 18 Op-Ed from Cincinatti.com). UPDATE: However many see broader remarks by Pope Francis as being anti-Trump. (Irish Central, Nov. 7).

Recent Articles and Book

From SSRN:

• Sally Tyler, Of Temples and Territory: The ICJ's Preah Vihear Decision and Implications for Regional Dispute Resolution, (University of the District of Columbia Law Review, Forthcoming).
• Shaun  Alberto de Freitas, Doctrinal Sanction and the Protection of the Rights of Religious Associations: Ecclesia De Lange v The Presiding Bishop of the Methodist Church of Southern Africa, (Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, Vol. 19, 2016).
• Nancy Levit, After Obergefell: The Next Generation of LGBT Rights Litigation, (84 UMKC L. Rev. 605 (2016)).
• Ashraf Booley, The Rights and Freedoms of Moroccan Women: Has the 2004 Reforms Benefited Moroccan Women?, (Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, Vol. 19, 2016).
• R.P.C.R. Rajapakse & Hiruni Nirmali Kaushala, Islamic Banking in Sri Lanka - A Literature Review, (Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research (IJIR) Vol 2. Issue 6 pp. 1346-1352 (2016)).
• Mohamed Badar, The Self-Declared Islamic State (ISIS / Da‘Esh) and Ius Ad Bellum Under Islamic International Law, (The Asian Yearbook of Human Rights and Humanitarian Law (2017) vol. 1).
• Muhammad Masum Billah, Extensive Use of Ḥilah in Islamic Banking and Finance, ((2015) 59.1 Islamic Quarterly 65-88).

From SmartCILP and elsewhere:

• F. Peter Phillips, Ancient and Comely Order: The Use and Disuse of Arbitration by New York Quakers, 2016 Journal of Dispute Resolution 81-114.
• Neil Foster, Freedom of Religion and Balancing Clauses in Discrimination Legislation, Oxford Journal of Law and Religion (2016).

New Book:

• Leslie C. Griffin, Law and Religion: Cases and Materials, Fourth Edition, (Foundation Press, 2016).

Recent Prisoner Free Exercise Cases

In Sioleski v. Capra, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 150556 (SD NY, Oct. 31, 2016), a New York federal district court dismissed for failure to exhaust administrative remedies an inmate's complaint that authorities refuse to recognize him as a Native American because he did not prove tribal affiliation; thus he is unable to attend Native American religious services, festivals and dances.

In Sokolsky v. California, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 150754 (ED CA, Oct. 31, 2016), a California federal magistrate judge denied a preliminary injunction to a civil detainee complaining that his rights to practice his Jewish religion were infringed and he was denied medically appropriate food.

In Chesser v. Rivas, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 151944 (SD IL, Nov. 2, 2016), a California federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendations and, while dismissing a number of claims, permitted a Muslim inmate to move ahead with his equal protection challenge to restrictions on his teaching or learning Arabic and wearing shortened pants.

In Chesser v. Walton, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 151940 (SD IL, Nov. 2, 2016), an Illinois federal district court dismissed a Muslim inmate's challenge to the congregate prayer policy that limited limited Muslims to once a week instead of the five daily group prayers. However plaintiff was permitted to proceed with his retaliation claim.

In Quezada v. Cate, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 152213 (ED CA, Nov. 1, 2016),  a California federal magistrate judge recommended concluding that plaintiff met the criteria for a "vexatious litigant" and should be required to post $10,000 in security before proceeding with his complaint that he was denied Jewish kosher meals.

EEOC Sues Over Job Denial To Pentecostal Who Rejected Dress Code Mandate

On Thursday, the EEOC announced that it had filed a religious discrimination suit against the Michigan-based Akebono Brake Corp.  The complaint charges that the company's dress code requires all employees to wear pants.  The company refused to hire as a temporary laborer Clintoria Burnet, a member of the Apostolic Faith Church of God and True Holiness, whose religious beliefs require her as a woman to wear skirts or dresses and not pants. The company failed to offer any religious accommodation to meet Burnet's Pentecostal Christian beliefs.

Another Challenge Filed To "Church Plan" Status of Retirement Plan

Another religiously affiliated health care system has been sued by participants in its retirement plan who claim that the plan is not exempt from ERISA as a "church plan."  The complaint (full text) in Sheedy v. Adventist Health System Sunbelt Healthcare Corp., (MD FL, filed 10.28/2016), contends that the plans are underfunded by $134 million. The complaint alleges that:

the Plans do not meet ERISA's requirements for the "church plan" exemption because they were not "established,"and are not "maintained" by a church.

Reporting on the lawsuit, BNA Daily Report for Executives (Nov. 1, 2016) [subscription required] says:

 The 12-count lawsuit against Adventist Health differs from many of its predecessors because it targets several pension plans, including a multiemployer plan covering several Adventist-affiliated entities and a group of frozen plans in which participants are no longer accruing benefits.

The case is also noteworthy for being the first to target a hospital system with ties to the Seventh-Day Adventist Church. The vast majority of the nearly 40 church plan lawsuits have targeted Catholic health-care providers.

Petitions for certiorari in other cases posing the same issue are pending before the U.S. Supreme Court. (See prior posting).

Georgia Drops Demands For Copies of Sermons In Discrimination Case

As previously reported, last month the Georgia Department of Public Health created significant controversy when, as part of its discovery requests in a religious discrimination lawsuit filed against it by a Seventh Day Adventist lay minister, it asked its former employee to furnish notes or transcripts of his sermons. Christian Post reported this week that Georgia has now dropped that demand, but is still asking for his ministerial credentials; proof he has served with the Seventh Day Adventist church; his contracts with the Church; and details any compensation for his sermons.

3rd Circuit Hears Oral Arguments In Contraceptive Coverage Mandate Case

Yesterday the U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral arguments (audio of full arguments) in Real Alternatives, Inc. v. Burwell. In the case, a Pennsylvania federal district court rejected a challenge by a non-profit, non-religious pro-life group to the scope of the Affordable Care Act contraceptive coverage mandate.  The non-profit argued, among other things, that it should be extended the same exemption from furnishing its employees contraceptive coverage as is given to religious employers. (See prior posting.)

British Court Rejects Imam's Defamation Claim Against BBC

In Begg v. British Broadcasting Corp., (EWHC, Oct. 28, 2016), a British trial court dismissed a defamation claim brought against the BBC by the chief imam of a London mosque.  The claimant,  Shakeel Begg, sued over a description of him included in a BBC current affairs television program. The court concluded however that:

the words complained of ... are substantially true in their meanings: (1) The Claimant is an extremist Islamic speaker who espouses extremist Islamic positions. (2) The Claimant had recently promoted and encouraged religious violence by telling Muslims that violence in support of Islam would constitute a man’s greatest deed.

In an interesting portion of its analysis, the court said:

I turn to consider what is properly to be considered “extreme” in the context of Islam and Islamic doctrinal positions. It is necessary to do so in order to determine that the BBC’s plea of justification for the [words complained of] is made out, viz. “The Claimant is an extremist Islamic speaker who espouses extremist Islamic positions”. The various speeches and posts relied upon by the BBC were given by the Claimant on Islamic issues in his capacity as an Imam and directed to predominantly Muslim audiences. The analysis of what is “extreme” and what are “extremist Islamic positions” is, therefore, necessarily to be judged initially through the prism of Islam.

Then the court (beginning in paragraph 118) sets out ten teachings or beliefs that meet the definition of Islamic extremism. Out-Law.com reporting on the decision notes that this is one of the last cases based on laws that preceded the 2013 Defamation Act.  That Act changed the defense of "justification" to the defense of "truth".

Interview On State of Church-State Relations

For readers who may be interested, Christianity Today's Church Law & Tax today published an interview with me titled Q&A: The Current State of Church-State Relations.

Brazilian Court Awards Damages Against Priest Who Prevented An Abortion

Life Site News reported yesterday that Brazil's appellate court, the Superior Tribunal de Justiça, has ruled in favor of a couple that brought suit against an activist Catholic priest who in 2005 convinced a court to halt an abortion sought by the couple.  The parents had sought a court order to permit the abortion when it became clear that the fetus suffered a severe deformity. Fr. Luiz Carlos Lodi da Cruz, at the time a law student, intervened and successfully sought habeas corpus on behalf of the fetus. Ultimately the child died eight days after birth. The appellate court, in awarding the parents damages equivalent to $18,537 (US), held that the priest had recklessly abused the legal process, causing useless suffering and intense moral damage to the parents.

Sex Abuse Suit Filed Against Guam Archdiocese

As previously reported, in September Guam retroactively eliminated its statute of limitations for civil suits alleging child sexual abuse. In the wake of this, according to AP, a civil lawsuit has now been filed by four former altar boys alleging that decades ago they were molested-- three in the 1970's by Archbishop Anthony Apuron and one in the 1950's by Father Louis Brouillard. The suit names the Archdiocese as well as Apuron and Brouillard as defendants.  Archbishop Apuron, who was relieved of his duties by  the Vatican in June when charges first surfaced, was replaced Monday by Bishop Michael Jude Byrnes, the auxiliary bishop of Detroit, who has been named coadjutor bishop of the Guam archdiocese.

Obama: Army Corps Looking For Alternative Pipeline Route To Protect Sioux Lands

As previously reported, the Sioux Tribe has been embroiled in litigation attempting to stop construction of an oil pipeline near the Standing Rock Indian Reservation in in North and South Dakota, contending that the construction will destroy sacred ancestral Tribal lands.  A federal district court has refused to enjoin the construction. Nevertheless the federal government said it would delay approval of the construction.  Now, NPR reports that on Tuesday President Obama told an interviewer that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is examining possible alternate routes for the Dakota Access Pipeline. Obama said in part:

We're monitoring this closely and I think, as a general rule, my view is that there's a way for us to accommodate sacred lands of Native Americans. I think right now the Army Corps is examining whether there are ways to reroute this pipeline in a way. So we're going to let it play out for several more weeks and determine whether or not this can be resolved in a way that I think is properly attentive to the traditions of the first Americans.

In Israel, Egalitarian Protesters Confront Western Wall Authorities

In Israel today, the conflict between ultra-Orthodox Jewish groups and egalitarian streams of Judaism led to physical clashes at the Western Wall.  Haaretz reports that leaders of the Conservative and Reform movements as well as Women of the Wall broke through security guards and carried Torah scrolls to the Wall in protest of the government's continuing failure to follow through on an agreement to create a separate egalitarian prayer space at the Wall. The group had obtained a permit from police for the demonstration; however the Western Wall Heritage Foundation that controls the area was not informed of this.  Young ultra-Orthodox boys confronted the group with scuffles breaking out. In a statement, Prime Minister Netanyahu's office criticized the protest saying: "unilateral breaches of the status quo in the Kotel harm our attempts to reach a compromise."  But a spokesperson for the protesters said that waiting has yielded no results.

Amish Say They Are Targets of Law Requiring Horses To Wear Collection Bags

The Bowling Green Kentucky Daily News reported last week that Amish defendants are challenging an Auburn, Kentucky ordinance (Sec. 90.088(B)) that requires horses and other large animals on city streets to wear collection bags to catch their excrement.  Auburn officials say the law is needed to keep city streets clean and prevent the spread of disease, but the Amish say the bags will frighten their horses.  Defendants in some of the 30 pending cases are arguing that the law unconstitutionally targets a particular group of Amish residents. [Thanks to Scott Mange for the lead.]

Trinity Western Law School Wins Appeal In British Columbia

In Trinity Western University v. Law Society of British Columbia, (BC Ct. App., Nov. 1, 2016), the Court of Appeal for the Canadian province of British Columbia held that the province's Law Society acted unreasonably when it denied approval to a proposed new law school at the Christian-affiliated Trinity Western University. The Law Society's vote was a reaction to a requirement at the University that students sign a Community Covenant that, among other things, does not recognize same-sex marriage. The court summarized its decision in part as follows:

The issue on appeal is whether the Law Society met its statutory duty to reasonably balance the conflicting Charter rights engaged by its decision: the sexual orientation equality rights of LGBTQ persons and the religious freedom and rights of association of evangelical Christians. The Benchers initially voted to approve TWU’s law school. That decision was met with a backlash from members of the Law Society who viewed it as endorsement of discrimination against LGBTQ persons. The Benchers decided to hold a referendum and to be bound by the outcome. A majority of lawyers voted against approval. The Benchers then reversed their earlier position and passed a resolution not to approve TWU’s law school.

In doing so, the Benchers abdicated their responsibility to make the decision entrusted to them by the Legislature. They also failed to weigh the impact of the decision on the rights engaged. It was not open to the Benchers to simply adopt the decision preferred by the majority. The impact on Charter rights must be assessed concretely, based on evidence and not perception.

... [D]enying approval would not enhance access to law school for LGBTQ students. In contrast, a decision not to approve TWU’s law school would have a severe impact on TWU’s rights.... 

In a diverse and pluralistic society, government regulatory approval of entities with differing beliefs is a reflection of state neutrality. It is not an endorsement of a group’s beliefs.

CBC News reports on the decision. [Thanks to David Fernandes for the lead.]

4th Circuit Grants En Banc Review In Legislative Prayer Case

The U.S. Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals announced this week that it has granted en banc review in Lund v. Rowan County, North Carolina. In the case, a 3-judge panel of the 4th Circuit held in a 2-1 decision that the practice of the Rowan County Board of Commissioners to open its meetings with an invocation led on a rotating basis by one of the commissioners is constitutional under the Supreme Court's Town of Greece decision. (See prior posting.)

Smithsonian Gets Curator of American Religious History

The Washington Post reported last week that the Smithsonian Institution for the first time since the 1890's has hired a Curator of American Religious History.  The post is held by Peter Manseau, the son of a former nun and a priest. (Background.) Funded by a $5 million grant from the Lilly Foundation, Manseau will curate new exhibits on American religious history and add important religious objects to the museum’s collections.  He is planning a 5-year series of events and exhibitions, the first of which will open in June 2017 at the National Museum of American History in Washington.

Judge Wants Greater Restrictions In Settlement of NYPD Muslim Surveillance Suit

As previously reported, in January the parties to a long-running class action challenging practices of the New York Police Department in surveillance Muslims reached a settlement agreement offering greater protections.  However, in Handschu v. Police Department of the City of New York, (SD NY, Oct. 28, 2016), the court rejected the proposed settlement, insisting on three additional restrictions.  As discussed in an ACLU press release on the decision:

The judge ... called for alterations that would:

Clarify the authority of an individual outside the NYPD (a civilian representative) to ensure the NYPD’s compliance with the “Handschu Guidelines” — which govern NYPD surveillance of political and religious activity — even beyond the terms of the reforms proposed by the settlement.

Require that the civilian representative established by the settlement report periodically to the court on the NYPD’s compliance. 

Require the mayor to seek court approval before abolishing the position of civilian representative.

New York Times reports on the decision.

Cert Denied In Ministerial Exception Case

The U.S. Supreme Court today denied certiorari in Melhorn v. Baltimore-Washington Conference of the United Methodist Church, (Docket No. 16-245, cert. denied 10/31/2016) (Order List.) In the case, the Maryland Court of Special Appeals in an unreported opinion (set out in Appendix 1 to the Petition for Certiorari), applied the ministerial exception doctrine to bar a wrongful discharge suit by a pastor who was fired after refusing to accept the $600,000-plus portion of a bequest for upkeep of a cemetery that the church no longer owned.

Recent Articles, Book and Video of Interest

From SSRN:

• Arthur J. Jacobson, The Messiah and the Law, (Cardozo Legal Studies Research Paper No. 502 (2016)).
• Alan C. Weinstein, Regulation of Religious Uses Under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, (Cleveland-Marshall Legal Studies Paper No. 16-296 (2016)).
• Nomi Maya Stolzenberg, It's about Money: The Fundamental Contradiction of Hobby Lobby, (Southern California Law Review, Vol. 88, 2015).
• Yinka Olomojobi, Legal Dimensions to Religious Freedom in Nigeria, (September 24, 2016).
• James Hill, Whose Best Interest? Why Michigan's New Adoption Law Is Unconstitutional and Prevents the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services from Helping Adoptable Children, (2 Admin. Law Rev. Accord 17, 2016).
• Paola Bergallo & Agustina Michel, Constitutional Developments in Latin American Abortion Law, (International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics 135 (2016) 228–231).
• Yinka Olomojobi, Radical Islam & E-Terrorism in Africa, (October 24, 2016).
• Robert W. McGee, Toilets, Transgenders, and the Supreme Court, (October 29, 2016).
• Robert W. McGee, The New Prohibitionism: The Movement to Regulate Personal Behavior, (October 26, 2016).

From SmartCILP:

• Symposium: Religious Liberty and the Free Society: Celebrating the 50th Anniversary of Dignitatis Humanae. Keynote address by John H. Garvey; articles by Paul Horwitz, Thomas C. Berg, Christopher C. Lund, Vincent Phillip Munoz, Brett G. Scharffs, Anna Su, Marc O. DeGirolami, Mark L. Movsesian and Steven D. Smith. 91 Notre Dame Law Review 1287-1569 (2016).
• Karyn Ball, Post-Secular Messianism Against the Law: Judith Butler on Walter Benjamin and 'Sacred Life', [Abstract], 27 Law & Critique 205-227 (2016).
• Janeanne Lubin-Szafranski & Gregory J. Pepe, Catholic Doctrine and Aid in Dying, 34 Quinnipiac Law Review 667-689 (2016).
• Jennifer A. Marshall, Burwell v. Hobby Lobby: Protecting Religious Freedom in a Diverse Society, [Abstract], 10 N.Y.U. Journal of Law & Liberty 327-345 (2016).

Recent Book:

• Daniel P. Dalton, Litigating Religious Land Use Cases, Second Edition, (ABA Book Publishing, Oct. 2016).

New Video:

• European Court of Human Rights, (Oct. 17, 2016).

Recent Prisoner Free Exercise Cases

In Smith v. Lind, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 146953 (WD WI, Oct. 24, 2016), a Wisconsin federal magistrate judge allowed a Muslim inmate to move ahead with various of his claims relating to denial of adequate Ramadan meals, Eid-ul-Fitr feast foods, and a non-vegan Halal diet, as well as the prohibition on inmate-led services.

In Malone v. Duvall, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 147031 (SD IL, Oct. 24, 2016), an Illinois federal district court dismissed with leave to amend an inmate's complaint that on one occasion he was denied religious services.

In Houston v. Collerman, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 148106 (ND NY, Oct 26, 2016), a New York federal district court dismissed without prejudice a Muslim inmate's claim that his free exercise rights were infringed when, because of a false misbehavior report, he was unable to participate in Ramadan and denied his religious meals.

In Goulding v. Kaemingk, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 148020 (D SD, Oct. 25, 2016), a South Dakota federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendation (2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 148327, Sept. 23, 2016), and dismissed an inmate's claim that his religious rights were infringed when authorities denied his request to hold his own non-denominational Christian worship services and Bible study on Saturdays.

 In Padilla v. Kernan, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 148386 (SD CA, Oct. 24, 2016), a California federal district court dismissed for failure to pay a filing fee an inmate's complaint that he was denied kosher meals for a 15 month period.

In Wofford v. Austin, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 148907 (WD MI, Oct. 27, 2016), a Michigan federal district court dismissed a Nation of Islam inmate's complaint that he was not provided a replacement meal when his Ramadan meal was cross-contaminated by spillage from one part of the meal onto another, and that he was verbally harassed when he complained.

In Espinoza v. Irby, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 149178 (D AZ, Oct. 25, 2016), an Arizona federal district court dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies an inmate's complaint that his kosher diet was discontinued.

In Booker v. Graham, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 149332 (ND NY, Oct. 26, 2016), a New York federal magistrate judge dismissed a Nation of Islam inmate's complaint that Ramadan observance was impeded by a facility-wide lockdown and that he was denied access to weekly congregate religious services while in administrative segregation. However the court allowed plaintiff to move ahead with his claim of retaliation for filing grievances over the Ramadan lockdown.

In Raines v. Guembe, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 149978 (ED CA, Oct. 27, 2016), a California federal magistrate judge dismissed a complaint by a Wiccan inmate that there was a 6 week delay in his beginning to receive vegetarian religious meals after he requested them.

UPDATE: In Watkins v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, (11th Cir., Oct. 28, 2016), the 11th Circuit in a brief per curiam opinion affirmed a trial court injunction ordering the state to furnish a kosher diet to an inmate, rejecting the state's const containment and security arguments.

Louisiana Supreme Court Says No Mandatory Reporting of Abuse Discovered In Confessional

In Mayeux v. Charlet, (LA Sup. Ct., Oct. 28, 2016), the Louisiana Supreme Court held that under Louisiana statutes Catholic priests when administering sacramental confession are not "mandatory reporters" of child abuse. Therefore the provision in La. Child. Code art. 609 that eliminates a defense of privileged communications in some instances for mandatory reporters does not eliminate protections for priests.  The court concluded:

Because the provisions of La. Child. Code art. 609 speak only to “mandatory reporters,” a priest when administering the sacrament of confession has no duty to report any confidential communications made during the confession that, by the tenets of the Roman Catholic Church, he is authorized to hear and is also duty bound to keep confidential.

(See prior related posting.)

Preliminary Injunction Against Transgender Student Access To Restrooms Is Denied

In Students and Parents for Privacy v. U.S. Department of Education, (ND IL, Oct. 18, 2016), an Illinois federal magistrate judge issued a report and recommendation denying a preliminary injunction sought by plaintiffs who wish to require suburban Chicago schools to segregate restrooms and locker rooms on the basis of students’ biological sex assigned at birth. The suit also seeks to enjoin the federal government from enforcing its rule requiring transgender students have access to rest room and locker rooms that conform to their gender identity. The court said in part:

The law in the Seventh Circuit concerning the meaning of the term “sex” as used in Title IX may be in flux. Just last week, the Seventh Circuit vacated a decision by a panel of that court that adhered to a longstanding interpretation of the word “sex” in ... Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ... as very narrow, traditional and biological. Plaintiffs relied heavily on the now vacated panel decision.... Recent rulings by courts around the country including a district court in the Seventh Circuit evince a trend toward a more expansive understanding of sex in Title IX as inclusive of gender identity. Therefore, the Court cannot say with confidence that Plaintiffs have a likelihood of success on the merits.... 

High school students do not have a constitutional right not to share restrooms or locker rooms with transgender students whose sex assigned at birth is different than theirs. In addition, sharing a restroom or locker room with a transgender student does not create a severe, pervasive, or objectively offensive hostile environment under Title IX given the privacy protections District 211 has put in place in those facilities and the alternative facilities available to students who do not want to share a restroom or locker room with a transgender student....

As previously reported, yesterday the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to review a case from the 4th Circuit raising similar issues.

Supreme Court Grants Review In Transgender School Bathroom Case

The U.S. Supreme Court today granted certiorari in Gloucester County School Board v. G.G., (Docket No. 16-273, cert. granted 10/28/2016) (Order List). The grant of review was limited to Questions 2 and 3 in the Petition for Certiorari.  In the case, the U.S. 4th Circuit Court of Appeals held that a Virginia school board's policy barring a transgender boy (who had not undergone sex-reassignment surgery) from using the boy's rest rooms at his school violates Title IX's ban on discrimination on the basis of sex. (See prior posting.)

NY Municipalities Settle Discrimination Suit Against Them Alleging Anti-Hasidic Bias

JTA reports that the upstate Village of Bloomingburg and the Town of Mamakating, New York have reached a settlement with a developer who sued claiming that the municipalities engaged in an anti-Semitic conspiracy to prevent more Hasidic Jews from moving into the area. The lawsuit filed in 2014 (see prior posting) claimed, among other things, that the municipalities violated the fair housing and civil rights laws in blocking the completion of a 396-unit townhouse project out of fear that would be occupied mostly by Hasidic families. Under the settlement, the developer's company Sullivan Farms II will be be paid by the municipalities' insurer $1.595 million on behalf of  Mamakating and $1.305 million on behalf of Bloomingburg.

European Parliament Lifts Jean-Marie Le Pen's Immunity To Allow Race Hatred Prosecution

AFP and The Forward report that on Tuesday the European Parliament lifted the legal immunity of Jean-Marie Le Pen, former head of France's far-right National Front Party. The move allows French prosecutors to put Le Pen on trial for inciting racial hatred.  The charges stem from a 2014 interview video posted on the National Front website in which Le Pen countered criticism from singer Patrick Bruel, who is Jewish, by using a reference to the Nazi gas chambers. Le Pen said Bruel should "go in the oven."

Synagogue Cited For Loud Siren Marking Start of Sabbath

According to a report yesterday from WABC-TV News, New York City's Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) has issued a citation to a Brooklyn synagogue because of the loud siren it uses weekly to announce the beginning of the Sabbath.  The 106-decibel siren installed this summer by Congregation Bais Yaakov Nechemia D'satmar is sounded for 90 seconds twice each Friday-- about 15 minutes apart. A DEP hearing is scheduled for November 22.

Elaborate Christmas Display Is Not Public Nuisance

According to the Broward County Sun Sentinel, a Florida state trial court judge yesterday dismissed a suit by the city of Plantation, Florida seeking to enjoin Mark and Kathy Hyatt from erecting the elaborate Christmas display that they have annually put up at their home. (See prior posting.) The court ruled that the city had failed to show that the display-- containing 200,000 lights, a movie screen a 30-foot tree and a Ferris wheel for stuffed animals-- constitutes a public nuisance.

3rd Circuit Judge Questions Religious Mix of Syrian Refugees

In Heartland Alliance National Immigrant Justice Center v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, (7th Cir., Oct. 21, 2016), the U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals in a Freedom of Information Act case upheld the government's refusal to disclose to an advocacy group for asylum seekers the names of so-called "Tier III terrorist organizations." Judge Daniel Manion filed a concurring opinion with extensive dicta questioning the religious mix of Syrian refugees who have been admitted to the country.  He said in part:

I write separately for a second, critical reason, which is my concern about the apparent lack of Syrian Christians as a part of immigrants from that country. It is possible that our case bears a direct link to this enigma.  It is well‐documented that refugees to the United States are not representative of that war‐torn area of the world. Perhaps 10 percent of the population of Syria is Christian, and yet less than one‐half of one percent of Syrian refugees admitted to the United States this year are Christian.... To date, there has not been a good explanation for this perplexing discrepancy.

This is not to suggest that any refugee group is more or less welcome: quite the contrary. The good people of this country routinely welcome immigrants from all over the world. But in a democracy, good data is critical to public debate about national immigration policy.

The Daily Signal reports on Manion's opinion.

Court Allows Suit Against Catholic Order and Diocese Over Pedophile Priest To Continue

In Doe v Congregation of the Mission of St. Vincent De Paul in Germantown, (Queens Cty. NY Sup. Ct., Sept. 13, 2016) a New York trial court in a decision published only this week refused to dismiss negligent hiring and retention, negligent training and supervision, and fraudulent concealment claims against the Vincentian Order and the Roman Catholic Diocese of Rockville Centre. The suit revolves around a priest, Augusto Cortez, who in 2009 was placed on 6 years' probation under a Personal Safety Plan administered by the Vincentians after he pleaded guilty to forcible touching of a 12 year old Brooklyn girl. Plaintiffs in this case allege that Cortez abused their young daughter beginning as early as 2009 (when she was 2 years old) and continuing until 2014 when the abuse was discovered. Cortez fled the country after being questioned by police about the allegations. A New York Times report when the suit was filed in 2015 elaborates:

After [Cortez's] arrest in 2008 ... the plaintiff’s mother sought the counsel of a priest of Mr. Cortez’s order who worked at a parish church in the Diocese of Rockville Centre. He told her that whatever had transpired between Mr. Cortez and the girl in Brooklyn “was just an accident”.... The girl’s mother accepted the priest’s interpretation, the lawsuit said, and “believed it was safe for her and her family” to continue their friendship with Mr. Cortez, who, like the girl’s parents, are from Guatemala.

IRS' Tax Exempt Division Getting New Leader

According to BNA Daily Report for Executives (Oct. 25) [subscription required], the Internal Revenue Service's Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division (TE Division) is undergoing another change in leadership.  Tamera Ripperda who replaced the embattled Lois Lerner as director and has apparently successfully streamlined the Division and eliminated a large backlog is moving to become acting deputy commissioner of the Small Business and Self Employed Division.  The new acting head of the TE Division beginning November 14 will be Margaret A. Von Lienen, who is now director of examinations for exempt organizations.

New York's Tax Exemptions For Religious Property Are Growing

The Lower Hudson Journal News this week is running a series on New York's tax exemption policy. An overview of the series reports in part:

Statewide: Thirty-one percent of New York's land value is tax exempt. Of its $2.8 trillion in land value, about $866 billion of it never gets billed.

Religious groups: The value of religious groups' land bypassed for taxation has nearly doubled from $14 billion to $26 billion between 1999 and 2015. Rochester (568 properties worth $141 million) and Ramapo (523 properties worth $265 million) are among the top five communities with the highest number of tax-exempt religious nonprofit properties in the state.

Yesterday's installment titled New York religious property tax breaks soar heavenward reports in greater detail on the increased amount of property receiving tax exemptions because of use by non-profit religious institutions.

Discovery Demand For Pastor's Sermons Generates Controversy

As previously reported, last April Eric Walsh, a doctor and public health expert, filed a religious discrimination suit against the Georgia Department of Public Health alleging that his termination shortly after he was hired was based on the content of sermons he had given as a Seventh Day Adventist lay minister. Now the Georgia Department of Public Health's discovery requests (full text) in the case have generated a new religious freedom controversy. Among the 22 categories of documents that plaintiff was requested to produce was:

Please produce a copy of your sermon notes and/or transcripts.

According to a First Liberty press release yesterday, Walsh will not turn over his sermons unless he is forced to do so, saying that no government has the right to require a pastor to turn over his sermons. Other advocacy groups have reacted in even stronger terms.  For example, Concerned Women for America captioned its press release "Georgia 'Gestapo' Combing Through Pastor's Sermons."

New Survey Findings On Religion and American Culture and Politics

The Public Religion Research Institute this week released its findings from the 2016 American Values Survey in a 48-page report titled The Divide Over America's Future: 1950 or 2050?. While the report is wide-ranging, portions dealt with religion and American culture and politics.Here are some excerpts from the report's Executive Summary:

Americans are divided about whether American culture and way of life have changed for worse (51%) or better (48%) since the 1950s.....

No group has a dimmer view of American cultural change than white evangelical Protestants: nearly three-quarters (74%) say American culture has changed for the worse since the 1950s....

In 2016, Americans’ social networks are strongly segregated by party loyalties.... There is also evidence that American churches are highly segregated by party. More than eight in ten (83%) Trump supporters who attend religious services at least weekly estimate that most of their fellow church members are supporting Trump. Similarly, more than three-quarters (78%) of Clinton supporters who attend religious services at least weekly estimate that most of their fellow church members are supporting Clinton.

Candidate's Religious Views Become Issue In Montana Supreme Court Race

The conservative Christian religious beliefs of one of the candidates for Justice of the Montana Supreme Court-- attorney and law professor Kristen Juras-- has become a campaign issue. In endorsing her opponent Dirk Sandefur, the Bozeman Daily Chronicle last week said in part:

In an email sent to a colleague at the UM she stated, “After lots of prayer I decided to run…I think there are going to be a lot of cases affecting religious freedom that arise over the next several years, and I’d like to be part of the decision-making body that will be addressing those issues.”

Juras was quoted earlier this year by the Montana Christian Journal: “It is important to elect justices who respect all of our fundamental rights, including the free exercise of religion, and who have not pre-determined that one right should outweigh another.”

Just like [Republican nominee for Montana governor] Greg Gianforte, Juras uses “religious freedom” as a dog whistle in attempts to deny civil rights to the LGBTQ community. Juras’ bias and lack of experience make her unfit for the Supreme Court. Dirk Sandefur is hard-working, fair, and the only qualified candidate.

The Missoulian also raises questions about the impact of Juras' religious views.

Complaint Filed Against Catholic Hospitals Over Refusal To Perform Sterilizations

The ACLU announced yesterday that it has filed an Administrative Complaint (full text) with the Department of Health and Human Services Office for Civil Rights against Ascension Health challenging its reliance on the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops Ethical and Religious Directives for Catholic Health Care Services. Specifically the complaint contends that the refusal by a Michigan hospital to perform sterilization (tubal ligation) during childbirth amounts to pregnancy-related discrimination. The Affordable Care Act prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex in any health care program or activity receiving federal funds. An ACLU press release announced the filing of the complaint.

Suit Challenges Utah's "Anti-Gay School Laws"

Suit was filed in Utah federal district court last week challenging Utah's so-called "Anti-Gay School Laws." As summarized in a press release from the National Center for Lesbian Rights:

The lawsuit challenges several Utah laws and regulations that prevent positive portrayals of gay, lesbian, and bisexual people in curricula, classroom discussions, and student clubs. The lawsuit claims that these discriminatory restrictions create a negative environment for LGBT students, perpetuate discrimination and bullying, and contribute to the high rates of anti-LGBT harassment in Utah schools. For instance, one plaintiff experienced severe physical and verbal harassment from other students in his kindergarten class based on his gender non-conformity. When his parents complained to school leaders about the harassment, they were told that the school district could not protect their son because of these discriminatory school laws.

The complaint (full text) in Equality Utah v. Utah State Board of Education,(D UT, filed 10/21/2016), contends that the statutes and regulations being challenged violate the 1st and 14th Amendments, as well as Title IX and the Equal Access Act.

Settlements Revealed In Abuse Cases Against Jewish School

A suit filed last week in state court in New York reveals information about the previously secret settlements by an Orthodox Jewish school in two cases of sexual abuse dating back to the 1970's. The Gothamist and the New York Post report that the settlements totaling $2.1 million were reached in 2014 with two plaintiffs who were abused as young boys by Rabbi Joel "Yehuda" Kolko who was kept on for 25 years as a teacher at Yeshiva Torah Temimah in Brooklyn. The settlements came to light when the victims now filed suit for $1 million of the promised settlements that have not been paid. It has been alleged that Rabbi Kolko had abused numerous other students, though an internal investigation by the school rejected the claims. In 2012 in a plea agreement, Kolko pleaded guilty to two misdemeanor counts of child endangerment.

Northern Ireland Appeals Court Upholds Anti-Gay Discrimination Finding Against Bakery

In a widely watched case, the Court of Appeal in Northern Ireland yesterday upheld the finding of a trial judge that a bakery had illegally discriminated on the basis of sexual orientation in the  provision of goods and services to the public when it refused an order for a cake for a private event marking the end of 'Northern Ireland Anti-homophobic Week' and the political momentum towards same-sex marriage legislation.  The cake was to feature a picture of 'Bert and Ernie' (the logo for QueerSpace) with the caption, "Support Gay Marriage."  In Lee v. McArthur, (NI CA, Oct. 24, 2016), the 3-judge panel rejected the religious freedom and compelled speech defenses advanced by Ashers Bakery.  The court rejected the notion that the cake forced the bakery to express approval for same-sex marriage, saying in part:

The fact that a baker provides a cake for a particular team or portrays witches on a Halloween cake does not indicate any support for either.

The court rejected broadly defendants' religious discrimination arguments, saying:

Anyone who applies a religious aspect or a political aspect to the provision of services may be caught by equality legislation, not because the legislation treats their religious belief or political opinion less favourably but because that person seeks to distinguish, on a basis that is prohibited, between those who will receive their service and those who will not....  In the present case the appellants might elect not to provide a service that involves any religious or political message. What they may not do is provide a service that only reflects their own political or religious belief in relation to sexual orientation.

The Guardian, reporting on the decision, says that the decision will be appealed to the UK's Supreme Court.

Recent Articles of Interest

From SSRN:

• Susanna Mancini, Global Religion in a Post-Westphalia World, (Handbook on Global Constitutionalism (A. Lang & A. Wiener eds.), Elgar Publishing (2017 Forthcoming)).
• Steven Aiello, Islamic and Jewish Law Approaches to Killing, (October 15, 2016).
• Rangita de Silva de Alwis & Indira Jaising, The Role of Personal Laws in Creating A 'Second Sex', (New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, Vol. 48, Pg. 1085, 2016).
• Alan C. Weinstein, Regulation of Religious Uses Under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, (Local Government, Land Use, and the First Amendment, American Bar Association, 2017 Forthcoming).
• Effie Fokas, Banal, Benign or Pernicious? Religion and National Identity From the Perspective of Religious Minorities in Greece, (New Diversities, 2015, Vol. 17, No. 1, 47-62).
• Daphne Gilbert, Let Thy Conscience Be Thy Guide (But Not My Guide!): Physicians and the Duty to Refer, (McGill Journal of Law and Health 2016 10(2)).
• Neil Siegel, The Distinctive Role of Justice Samuel Alito: From a Politics of Restoration to a Politics of Dissent, (Yale Law Journal Forum, Vol. 126, p.164 (2016)).
• Fatmir Halili & Arif Riza, The Betrothal and Marriage - According to Islamic Law (Shariah) and Under the Secular System, (October 15, 2016).

From SmartCILP and elsewhere:

• Gregory M. Lipper, The Contraceptive-Coverage Cases and Politicized Free-Exercise Lawsuits, University of Illinois Law Review, Vol. 2016. pp. 1331- 1346.
• Yifat Bitton, Suspension, Hu(wo)man Rights and Torts: Discriminatory Religious Practices and Hu(wo)man Rights Suspension Tactics in Remedying Feminine Suffering Through Tort Law, 14 Seattle Journal for Social Justice 669-726 (2016).
• Charles Leben, Hebrew Sources in the Doctrine of the Law of Nature and Nations in Early Modern Europe, 27 European Journal of International Law 79-106 (2016).
• Marvin Lim, Human Dignity and Punishment in Judaic and Islamic Law: War and the Death Penalty, [Abstract], 22 Southwestern Journal of International Law 303-358 (2016).
• Shlomo C. Pill, Valuing Our Discordant Constitutional Discourse: Autonomous-Text Constitutionalism and the Jewish Legal Tradition, 64 Buffalo Law Review 349-411 (2016).

Recent Prisoner Free Exercise Cases

In Peele v. Klemm, (3d Cir., Oct. 17, 2016), the 3rd Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a Muslim inmate's complaint that a Department of Corrections policy restricts rights to attend Eid al-Adha and Eid al-Fitr feasts. Inmates were required to pay for the feast and had to participate in all of Ramadan.

In Wilkins v. Lemon, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 143491 (ND IN, Oct. 17, 2016), an Indiana federal district court allowed a Muslim inmate to move ahead on claims for damages and injunctive relief for being denied halal meat, prayer oils and festive foods for the Eids.

In Biggins v. Coupe, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 143696 (D DE, Oct. 14, 2016), a Delaware federal district court held that an inmate's in forma pauperis free exercise claim is barred by the 3-strike rule even though it was brought as a mandamus action.

In Abreu v. Travers, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 145171 (ND NY, Oct. 20, 2016), a New York federal district court held because plaintiff failed to identify his religion, it could not determine if the denial of one kosher meal placed a substantial burden on his religious beliefs.

In Wallace v. Olivarria, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 146380 (SD CA, Oct. 21, 2016), a California federal district court dismissed an inmate's complaint that his religious practice was burdened by changing his schedule for his prison job.

"Blessing" Scam Leads To Hate Crime Charges

Last week, the Kings County (Brooklyn), New York district attorney announced that a 44-year-old woman has been indicted on charges of grand larceny as a hate crime for taking $160,000 in cash and jewelry from two Chinese women in separate incidents involving the same type of scam. The victims were told that they or family members would die because of a curse that could only be removed by gathering large sums of cash and jewels to be blessed. The victims were told to place the cash and jewels in a bag for the blessing.  When the victims later opened the bag, they found the cash and jewels gone. According to NBC News, the hate crime charges were based on the theory that the victims were targeted because of their Chinese ethnicity and because of their religious spiritual beliefs.

Judgment For Return of Pastor's Salary Is Not Dischargeable in Bankruptcy

In In re Andrews, 2016 Bankr. LEXIS 3786 (SD MI Bankr., Oct 20, 2016), a Mississippi federal bankruptcy judge held that amounts the former pastor of a break-away church owed to the parent body of the denomination are not dischargeable in a Chapter 13 bankruptcy proceeding.  Robert Andrews was the long-time pastor of Cross Point Church, a church under the ecclesiastical jurisdiction of the Mississippi Conference of the Methodist Protestant Church.  While pastors are paid by local congregations, they are appointed and removed by the parent Conference. Andrews and the Board  of Cross Point Church voted to break away from its parent Conference. The district president of the Conference in response removed Andrews as Cross Point's pastor. The Board of Cross Point nevertheless entered a one-year employment contract with Andrews, including a provision that if the Conference removed Andrews, the pastor would be entitled to his full year's salary.

When the Conference then voted to reject Cross Point's attempted withdrawal, Cross Point's treasurer gave Andrews a check for his remaining yearly salary of $69,505. Andrews and his backers on the Board also locked the church building, took the keys and church records with them and formed a new congregation. In a suit by the remaining members of Cross Point, a state court issued a preliminary injunction requiring Andrews and his backers to return the keys and records. In a subsequent jury trial, the state court awarded Cross Point a judgment of $69,505 against Andrews, finding that Andrews had converted funds belonging to the Church. When Cross Point attempted to garnish Andrew's checking account to recover the funds, Andrews filed for Chapter 13 bankruptcy protection.

Cross Point claimed that the debt owed to it is not dischargeable.  The bankruptcy court agreed.  It first held that the ecclesiastical abstention doctrine precludes it from revisiting the question of Andrews' removal as pastor of Cross Point. It held that under Sec. 523(a)(4) of the Bankruptcy Code, the debt is not dischargeable because it involved "defalcation while acting in a fiduciary capacity" and "embezzlement."  The court said in part:

Andrews admitted at Trial that as pastor, officer, and Board member, he owed a fiduciary duty to Cross Point Church to safeguard its funds.