More Stabbings In Bangladesh Of Those Involved In Criticizing Islam

Last February in Bangladesh, the Bangladeshi-American blogger Avijit Roy was hacked to death in an attack by an Islamist group that objected to his secularist postings on science, religion and LGBT issues on his blog. (See prior posting.) Now, according to the New York Times, earlier today in Dhaka assailants entered the offices of Jagriti Publications which had published Avjit Roy's book"The Virus of Faith" and stabbed to death publisher Faisal Arefin Dipan.  Around the same time, several men entered the Shuddhashar publishing house and attacked Ahmed Rahim Tutul who had previously received death threats over books he had published, including one of Roy's. Tutul is in critical condition.  They also attacked two other men who were in the office with Tutul. One of those is Sudip Kumar Barman, a blogger who (under the name Ranadipam Basu) had posted on Roy's website. According to CNN, Al-Qaeda in the Indian Subcontinent (AQIS) claimed responsibility for the assaults, saying that the victims had made derogatory remarks about Islam. In Bangladesh, "hit lists" of secular writers have been circulating on the Internet.

Pakistan's Supreme Court Warns Against False Blasphemy Allegations

Earlier this week, Pakistan's Supreme Court published the opinion of its 3-judge panel which earlier this month upheld the death sentence that had been imposed on Mumtaz Qadri, a former elite force guard who in 2011 killed Salmaan Taseer, governor of Punjab Province.  Qadri acted because of Taseer's support for a pardon for Aasia Bibi, a Christian woman who had been sentenced to death for blasphemy. (See prior posting.)  The court used the opinion in Qadri v. State, (Sup. Ct. Pakistan, Oct. 7, 2015), to warn about the dangers of false blasphemy charges-- a significant problem in Pakistan.  The Court said in part.

In the following paragraphs of this judgment it shall be highlighted as to how the accused person in this case had acted on the basis of nothing but hearsay without getting his information ascertained, verified or investigated and, as Almighty Allah has warned, he has brought harm not only to another person but also to himself. Verily, such are the consequences when Almighty Allah’s warnings or commands are not heeded to....

Commission of blasphemy is abhorrent and immoral besides being a manifestation of intolerance but at the same time a false allegation regarding commission of such an offence is equally detestable besides being culpable. If our religion of Islam comes down heavily upon commission of blasphemy then Islam is also very tough against those who level false allegations of a crime. It is, therefore, for the State of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan to ensure that no innocent person is compelled or constrained to face an investigation or a trial on the basis of false or trumped up allegations regarding commission of such an offence.

The Guardian reports on the decision.

Indian Judge Concerned Over Water Pollution From Immersing of Idols

According to NDTV, in India a Justice on the Madras High Court is concerned that the traditional religious practice of immersing idols in bodies of water is having detrimental environmental effects.  At a bail hearing yesterday growing out of a clash at last month's Vinayaka Chaturthi idol immersion festival, Justice S Vaidyanathan commented:

On account of the immersion, materials like clay, bamboo, grass, wood, metals, jute, colours, painted cloth, flowers, incense sticks, dhoop, camphor and ash are released into water bodies..... It is not rational, prudent and judicious to pollute an already scarce commodity. This illiterate attitude towards water should be put to an end.

He suggested that artificial ponds might be built just for use during the festival season.

Washington Football Coach Is Latest Focus In Battle Over Prayer At School Activities

An AP report yesterday focused on Bremerton, Washington, High School assistant football coach Joe Kennedy who is quickly becoming the latest focus in the ongoing battle over prayer at public school events.  Kennedy has been praying mid-field at the end of the game since 2008, but his actions have not become a cause for controversy until last month. Needless to say, Kennedy and school officials have starkly differing narratives.

Kennedy's lawyers, the Liberty Institute, say that Kennedy is merely engaging in a personal faith practice, in which he has often been voluntarily joined by a majority of his team, other coaches and the opposing team. The school district, however, says that coaches still have duties after the game is over, and permitting Kennedy to engage in a public religious display in the midst of his duties would amount to district endorsement of religion. He has now been placed on paid administrative leave. The school district says it has offered to accommodate Kennedy by providing him a private location for him to use to pray in a way that does not interfere with his duties.  Kennedy's lawyer responds: "When it comes to religious freedom in the country, that's never been the law, that you can have religious expression, but you have to hide it somewhere." (Bremerton Patriot.)  Apparently Kennedy plans to sue claiming a denial of religious accommodation.

Meanwhile, others are getting into the act.  In October, the Freedom From Religion Foundation sent a letter to the Bremerton superintendent supporting the school district's position. (Press release.) As reported by the Christian Post, 47 members of Congress this week signed a letter (full text) supporting Kennedy. And (as reported by RT) this week the Seattle Chapter of the Satanic Temple, saying that the school has essentially turned the post-game field into a public forum for religion, wrote to school officials (full text of letter) saying: "In light of football coach Joe Kennedy’s public prayer on the Bremerton High football field at the October 18 game, The Satanic Temple of Seattle requests permission to also perform a public Satanic invocation on the football field after the next football game, at the behest of a Bremerton High student."

Suit Questions Whether Released Time Church Buses Must Meet School Bus Standards

Public Opinion News reported yesterday on a suit filed in a Franklin County, Pennsylvania trial court challenging the contention by Pennsylvania State Police that yellow buses used by a Christian camp to transport students to and from school for a once-a-week "released time" program must meet the standards for vehicles owned or under contract with a school district.  Among other things, the buses used by Camp Joy El do not have swinging stop signs attached to the side, are not marked as school buses and are not painted with the specifically required yellow paint. A state trooper stopped one of the buses for inspection in a church parking lot, cited it for 9 violations and refused to allow students to board the bus to return to school. The suit asks for a preliminary injunction and a declaratory judgment permitting the Joy El to resume using its buses. Since the citation,it has been renting other buses at a cost of over $5000 per week.

Appeals Court: Sexual Orientation Not Covered By Missouri's Ban On Sex Discrimination In Employment

In Pittman v. Cook Paper Recycling Corp., (MO App., Oct. 27, 2015), a Missouri appeals court in a 2-1 decision held that the Missouri Human Rights Act does not bar employment discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation. At issue was a hostile work environment claim by a former male employee of a recycling company. Judge Welsh's opinion held:

The clear meaning prohibiting discrimination based upon "sex" under the Missouri Human Rights Act intended by the Missouri legislature concerns discrimination based upon a person's gender and has nothing to do with sexual orientation.

Judge Clayton in a brief opinion concurred with the result only.  Judge Gabbert dissented, saying:

Where our legislature used the broad term “sex,” and that term has been defined in many realms and most recently by the EEOC to include sexual orientation, I prefer to believe that if one is looking to the legislature for guidance, the legislature’s failure to exclude sexual orientation is more telling than its failure to act to include.

Columbia Daily Tribune reports on the decision.

6th Circuit En Banc: 1st Amendment Protects Christian Proselytizers At Dearborn's Arab International Festival

In a case that generated six separate opinions spanning some 65 pages, the U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, sitting en banc, yesterday upheld the right of Bible Believers, a Christian group, to engage in provocative and offensive proselytizing of Muslims at the annual Dearborn, Michigan Arab International Festival. In Bible Believers v. Wayne County, Michigan, (6th Cir., Oct. 28, 2015), the majority described the Christian group's messages displayed on banners and T-shirts to a predominately Muslim crowd, many of who were adolescents. Among the slogans were: “Islam Is A Religion of Blood and Murder”; “Only Jesus Christ Can Save You From Sin and Hell”; and “Turn or Burn”. One member of the group also carried a severed pig's head on a spike, believing that Muslims are "petrified of that animal." After several encounters with hostile crowds, Bible Believers were escorted out of the Festival by police and ticketed.

Judge Clay's opinion of the court, joined in full by 7 other judges, concluded:

Ultimately, we find that Defendants violated the Bible Believers’ First  Amendment rights because there can be no legitimate dispute based on this record that the [Wayne County Sheriff's Office] effectuated a heckler’s veto by cutting off the Bible Believers’ protected speech in response to a hostile crowd’s reaction.

Several of the judges writing separate opinions concluded, contrary to the majority, that defendants at least enjoyed qualified immunity from damages.  Detroit News reports on the decision.

Homeless Shelter's Challenge To Permit Revocation Dismissed As Not Yet Ripe

In New Life Evangelistic Center, Inc. v. City of St. Louis, Missouri, (ED MO, Oct. 27, 2015), a Missouri federal district court dismissed as not ripe a lawsuit by a Christian church seeking to continue to operate its homeless shelter. The city's Board of Public Service voted to revoke the shelter's 32-bed hotel permit when, after receiving a petition from neighbors, it found that the shelter was housing up to 300 individuals per night.  The shelter however was given the option of coming into compliance with its license or obtaining a new appropriate permit.  The church responded by suing for a declaratory judgment and injunction, alleging that its rights under RLUIPA and the 1st and 14th Amendments had been infringed. However the court concluded:

at the time New Life filed this litigation, it had several options before it which made any claimed injury contingent on several possibilities and fairly speculative. Although the grace period in the Board's Order has elapsed, the Court finds that Plaintiff cannot escape the requirements of either appealing the Board's Order or proceeding with the filing of a new application as required by the Board's Order simply by prematurely filing a case in federal court.

Donald Trump On the Ayatollah and Middle Eastern Muslim Women

CBS News reports that Donald Trump, at a campaign rally on Monday, continued his unconventional rhetoric, this time in connection with the Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and Muslim women in the Middle East. Focusing on how he would address Khamenei, Trump said:

I'll say, 'Hey baby, how ya doing?' I will never call him the Supreme Leader. And I'll get along with him probably. And maybe not. And if he doesn't get along with me, they got problems. We don't.

He then went on to say that the U.S. should stop intervening to further women's rights in the Middle East because women there do not want freedom, as shown by their desire to wear burqas or niqabs that hide their face. Trump framed his conclusion this way:

With the women over there, they don't have to wear the you-know-what. And then I said, 'Oh well that makes sense. That's nice.' Then, I saw women interviewed. They said, 'We want to wear them. We've worn them for a thousand years. Why would anyone tell us?' They want to. What the hell are we getting involved for? The fact is it's easier. You don't have to put on make-up. Look how beautiful everyone looks. Wouldn't it be easier if "mwah" (kissing sound)? Right? Wouldn't that be easy? I tell you if I was a woman - "mwah" - I'm ready darling. Let's go.

Ben Carson's Seventh Day Adventist Faith Is Explored

With Ben Carson coming in as either first or second in almost all the Republican presidential polls, yesterday the New York Times posted a lengthy survey of Dr. Carson's Seventh Day Adventist religion and his relationship to the denomination, saying in part:

In an election season where religion and politics have collided frequently, Mr. Carson’s faith remains a mystery to some and is something that could prove to be both a strength and a liability as he moves forward....

The Adventist legacy is rooted in the 19th century and grew out of what was known as the “Great Disappointment.” Most followers consider its initial founder to be William Miller, a Baptist preacher from upstate New York who calculated that Jesus Christ was due to return to earth on Oct. 22, 1844. When the savior failed to show up, the flock was left in a state of despair.

One of Mr. Miller’s followers, Ellen G. White, reconstituted the denomination under the doctrine that Christ had actually relocated to a heavenly sanctuary where he would begin judgment of the world. She was seen as a prophet.

Unlike members of other Christian denominations, Adventists honor the Sabbath on Saturdays instead of Sundays. They tend to be vegetarians and they continue to wait patiently for the Second Coming and the end of the world....

For theological reasons, Adventism has faced tensions with the Catholic and Baptist churches over the years....

Today Is International Religious Freedom Day

October 27 is International Religious Freedom Day, marking the 17th anniversary of the passage of the International Religious Freedom Act. (Background.) It also commemorates the execution of the Boston Martyrs on this day in 1659. (Background). Secretary of State John Kerry issued a press statement marking the day and calling on the "international community – governments, civil society, and citizens alike – to speak out against religious persecution, and to stand unequivocally for religious freedom."  UPDATE: Also today a subcommittee of the House Foreign Affairs Committee held a hearing on The Global Crisis of Religious Freedom.  The prepared statements of the witnesses and a video of the nearly 3-hour hearing are available at the Committee's website.

Bangladesh Arrests Facebook Critic of Hajj Deaths On Charges Of Insulting Islam

Last week, the free speech advocacy group Article 19 called attention to the September 26 arrest in Bangladesh of Mohon Kumar Mondal, the leader of a Bangladeshi environmental organization, on charges of offending religious sentiments of Muslims.  After the death of hundreds in a crush and resulting stampede during the Hajj (see prior posting), Mohon published a Facebook posting criticizing Saudi Arabia's security arrangements at Mina, Saudi negligence in dumping dead bodies from the stampede, and questioning the rationality of the Hajj ritual of stoning the devil at Mina. Police arrested Mohon after a local political leader filed charges against him under Section 57 of the Information Communication and Technology Act.  That section prohibits the deliberate publication or transmission online of material which hurts or is likely to hurt religious sentiments.  Article 19 called for Mohon's release.

European Court Reverses Genocide Conviction For Killing of Lithuanian Partisans

In Vasiliauskas v. Lithuania, (ECHR, Oct. 20, 2015), the European Court of Human Rights in a 9-8 decision by the Grand Chamber reversed a genocide conviction by the courts of Lithuania. As summarized by the Court's press release:

The case concerned the conviction in 2004 of Mr Vasiliauskas, an officer in the State security services of the Lithuanian Soviet Socialist Republic from 1952 to his retirement in 1975, for the genocide in 1953 of Lithuanian partisans who resisted Soviet rule after the Second World War....

The Court found in particular that it was clear that Mr Vasiliauskas’ conviction had been based upon legal provisions that had not been in force in 1953, and that such provisions had therefore been applied retroactively....

Although the offence of genocide had been clearly defined in the international law (notably, it had been codified in the 1948 Genocide Convention....), the Court took the view that his conviction could not have been foreseen under international law as it stood at the time of the killings of the partisans. Notably, international treaty law had not included a “political group” in the definition of genocide [it only included national, ethnic, racial or religious groups] and customary international law was not clear on the definition....

 Courthouse News Service reports on the decision.

DOJ Sues Michigan Township Over Denial of Zoning Approval for Muslim School

The U.S. Department of Justice announced yesterday that it has filed a civil suit under RLUIPA against a township just south of Ann Arbor, Michigan challenging the refusal to rezone a vacant parcel of land to allow construction of a Muslim pre-K through 12 school. The complaint (full text) in United States v. Pittsfield Charter Township, (ED MI, filed 10/26/2015), contends that various findings by the township Planning Commission were unjustified and that the rezoning denial makes it impossible for Michigan Islamic Academy to carry out its religious mission. Detroit News reports on the lawsuit.

Dutch Appeals Court Denies Scientology Tax Exempt Status

In the Netherlands last Wednesday, a Dutch appellate court held that the Church of Scientology has not carried the burden of showing that it qualifies as a tax exempt public benefit organization.  The full text in Dutch of the Oct. 21 decision by the Court of the Hague is available online. As explained by The Underground Bunker, under Dutch law, an organization must show that 50% of its activities have a public benefit in order to obtain tax exempt status. The Dutch Supreme Court had remanded Scientology's case to the appellate court to determine if this criterion was met.  The appeals court concluded that over half of Scientology's activity in Amsterdam involved auditing and training courses offered at high prices. This suggests that private commercial interests were being served more than the public interest.

Trump Questions Carson's Religious Beliefs

On the Republican presidential campaign trail last week, Donald Trump raised questions about the Seventh Day Adventist beliefs of fellow candidate Ben Carson. According to the New York Post Trump told a Florida audience on Saturday:

I’m Presbyterian. Boy, that’s down the middle of the road folks, in all fairness. I mean, Seventh-day Adventist, I don’t know about. I just don’t know about.

Subsequently Trump refused to apologize for his remarks.

Amish Man Sues Challenging Photo ID Requirement To Buy Firearms

Under 18 USC 922(t)(1)(c) (part of the Brady Bill), in order to purchase a firearm an individual must present the seller with a valid identification document that includes the purchaser's photo. According to Penn Live, last Friday an Amish man filed suit in a Pennsylvania federal district court challenging the application of the photo requirement to those who have a religious objection to being photographed. Plaintiff Andrew Hertzler contends that his rights under the Second Amendment and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act were violated when the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms refused to accommodate his Amish religious beliefs by accepting his state-issued non-photo ID along with other documentation.

Recent Articles and Books of Interest

From SSRN:

• Jean L. Cohen, Freedom of Religion, Inc.: Whose Sovereignty?, (October 19, 2015).
• Jean L. Cohen, Pluralism, Group Rights, and Corporate Religion: Reply to Critics, (Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy 2015 (44) 3).
• Carlos A. Ball, Sexuality, Third-Party Harms, and the 'Live-and-Let-Live' Approach to Religious Exemptions, (Law, Culture, and the Humanities, Forthcoming).
• Jessica M. Silbey, Picturing Moral Arguments in a Fraught Legal Arena: Fetuses, Photographic Phantoms and Ultrasounds, (Georgetown Journal of Gender and the Law, Vol. 16, No. 3, 2015).
• Serena Mayeri, Marital Supremacy and the Constitution of the Nonmarital Family, (California Law Review, Vol. 103, p. 1277, 2015).

From SSRN (Non-U.S. Law)

• Melissa Crouch, Negotiating Legal Pluralism in Court: Fatwa and the Crime of Blasphemy in Indonesia, (Gary Bell and Michael Dowdle (eds) Festschrift in Honour of MB Hooker. Singapore: ISEAS, Forthcoming).
• Virgemarie A. Salazar, The Caliphate in the Era of Nation-States, (October 7, 2014).
• Andrew F. March, Islamic Philosophy (Falsafa) and Law, (The Oxford Handbook of Islamic Law, eds., Anver M. Emon and Rumee Ahmed (Forthcoming)).
• Tim Cunningham, Monitoring Equality - Reflexive Regulation, Planning Systems, and the Role of Equality Law: Lessons from Northern Ireland, (The Equal Rights Review, Vol. Fourteen, (2015)).
• Ifran Hossain Mollah, Hindu Women's Right to Property at the Crossroads: The Tension between Human Rights and Cultural Relativism, (Journal of Society and Change Volume VIII, No. IV, 1915).
• Mauro Gatti, Blasphemy in European Law, ( In M. Díez Bosch and J. Sànchez Torrents (eds), On Blasphemy (Blanquerna, 2015), pp. 49-64).
• Catherine J. Iorns Magallanes, Maori Cultural Rights in Aotearoa New Zealand: Protecting the Cosmology that Protects the Environment, (21:2 Widener Law Review 273-327, 2015).

From SmartCILP:

• Eric Apar, The Perils of Doubt: Happiness, Epistemological Certainty, and Free Exercise Rights, 49 Valparaiso University Law Review 155-199 (2014).
• Angela C. Carmella, After Hobby Lobby: The "Religious For-Profit" and the Limits of the Autonomy Doctrine. 80 Missouri Law Review 381-449 (2015).
• Henry L. Chambers Jr., The Problems Inherent In Litigating Employer Free Exercise Rights, 86 University of Colorado Law Review 1141-1171 (2015).
• Donald H.J. Hermann, Defending the Public Good and Traditional Society: Non-Scriptural Religious Objections to Same-Sex Marriage, 49 Valparaiso University Law Review 1-37 (2014).
• Audra L. Savage, Turning the Other Cheek: The Persecution of the Christian Minority, 26 Florida Journal of International Law 373-397 (2014).

Recent Books:

• Stephen Monsma & Stanley Carlson-Thies, Free To Serve: Protecting the Religious Freedom of Faith Based Organizations, (Brazos Press, Oct. 2015).
• Jonathan Sacks, Not In God's Name: Confronting Religious Violence,  (Schocken, Oct. 2015), reviewed by Deseret News.

Replica of Removed Oklahoma 10 Commandments Given To Oklahoma Governor [Corrected]

AP reports that on Friday, 11 riders from a Texoma Cowboy Church in Wichita Falls, Texas delivered to Oklahoma governor Mary Fallin a replica of the Ten Commandments monument which a court ordered moved from the Oklahoma statehouse grounds. (See prior posting.)  Rev. John Riggs, leader of the church, told the governor:

We're riding for the law of God today. We fully believe that this country was founded upon the principles of God's word. It breaks our hearts to see where this country is headed and to see the removal of the law of God from our land, from our buildings.

Fallin said she will place the replica in her office. [Corrected--an earlier version of this posting incorrectly said the replica was delivered to the governor of Texas.]

Recent Prisoner Free Exercise Cases

In Barnes v. Furman, (2d Cir., Oct. 22, 2015), the 2nd Circuit upheld a prison's prior policy of limiting kosher meals to Jewish inmates (and denying them to Hebrew Israelites) and dismissed as moot a complaint regarding seizure of an inmate's religious head covering because he had now changed his religious designation to Protestant.  At the time, the head covering he wore (a Tsalot‐
Kob) was limited by prison rules to Rastafarians.

In King v. Barr, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 141454 (WD VA, Oct. 19, 2015), a Virginia federal district court held that a Muslim inmate failed to show that jail officials denied his classification to Phase III privileges because of his beard.

In Jones v. Blue Ridge Regional Jail Authority, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 142142 (WD VA, Oct. 20, 2015), a Virginia federal district court dismissed a Muslim inmate's complaint that authorities refused to provide vegan Ramadan meals.

In Burroughs v. Petrone, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 142732 ND NY, Oct. 15, 2015), a New York federal district court dismissed a Muslim inmate's vague complaints regarding removal from the religious service call-out sheet, confiscation of religious material, substitution of a Bible for the Qur'an and discarding of religious food.

Mikveh OK In Area Zoned For Places of Worship

In Matter of Winterton Properties, LLC v Town of Mamakating Zoning Board of Appeals, (NY App., OCT. 22, 2015), a New York state appellate court held that the term "neighborhood places of worship"  in a town's zoning law includes a mikveh (Jewish ritual bath).  The proposed mikveh is located in an area zoned for neighborhood places of worship, but the city claimed that the term only includes places of communal worship. The appeals court concluded: "The terms of the ordinance do not support this requirement, nor do we find it to be either established or supported by the dictionary definition..." [Thanks to Steven H, Sholk for the lead.]

Fire Department's Grooming Rules Upheld

In Mann v. City of Moss Point, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 144320 (SD MS, Oct. 23., 2015), a Mississippi federal district court dismissed the claim by a former fire captain that departmental grooming rules barring long hair such as dreadlocks violate his 1st Amendment free exercise rights.

7th Circuit Upholds Muslim Woman's Hostile Work Environment and Retaliation Claims

In Huri v. Office of the Chief Judge of the Circuit Court of Cook County, (7th Cir., Oct. 21, 2015), the U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals, reversing the district court, held that a Muslim woman's hostile work environment and retaliation claims should not be dismissed.  Fozyia Huri, a Saudi native employed by a state court as a child care attendant, complained particularly about her treatment by her supervisor, Sylvia McCullum, who is a devout and vocal Christian.  When Huri filed internal complaints about her treatment, she was transferred to the court reporter's office where her supervisors continued to treat her badly in retaliation for her complaints. AP reports on the decision,

Jury Awards Fired Muslim Drivers $240,000 In Damages

According to the Peoria Star Journal , an Illinois federal district court jury this week awarded $240,000 in damages to two Muslim men who were fired by the Illinois-based Star Transport, Inc. when the men refused on religious grounds to deliver alcohol.  In March, a federal judge held that the company's failure to accommodate the drivers' religious practices violated Title VII.  The 2-day jury trial focused on the amount of damages.  However it is unclear whether the judgment is collectible since the company went out of business earlier this year. (See prior related posting.)

Court Denies Class Certification In Title VII Religious Accommodation Suit Against GM

In Robinson v. General Motors Company, (ND TX, Oct. 21, 2015), a Texas federal district court  refused to certify as a class action a Title VII suit seeking to require General Motors to allow unpaid days off for observance of holy days by employees whose religious beliefs prohibit them from working or receiving compensation (e.g., vacation pay) on their holidays.  The suit was brought by two employees, one a member of the Tyler Sabbath Fellowship and the other a member of a Messianic Jewish congregation. The court dismissed the suit, saying:

Here, the Court has no way to ascertain the class under Plaintiffs’ definition since the requested class includes any GM employee who might request unpaid religious leave in the future....  Such a class is not adequately defined or ascertainable.

However plaintiffs were given leave to file an amended complaint.  Reuters reports on the decision.

Donald Trump: Closing Certain Mosques To Fight ISIS Might Be OK

Republican presidential front-runner Donald Trump has created a new controversy in an Oct. 20 interview (video of full interview) on Fox Business Varney & Co. in which he suggested that he might favor closing of certain mosques as a method to fight ISIS.  As reported by Mediaite:

Host Stuart Varney asked about a series of anti-ISIS measures the British government has taken. “They’ve got a whole new series of proposals to deal with this, including withdrawal of passports from some of these people who’ve gone over just to fight–”

“Absolutely. Good, good,” Trump said.

“…and closing some mosques,” he continued. “Would you do the same thing in America?”

“I would do that,” Trump responded. “Absolutely, I think it’s great.”

“Can you do it?” pressed Varney. “Can you close a mosque? We do have religious freedom.”

“Well, I don’t know,” Trump admitted. “I mean, I haven’t heard about the closing of the mosque. It depends, if the mosque is, you know, loaded for bear, I don’t know. You’re going to have to certainly look at it.”

In Ireland, Non-Catholic Students Have Difficulty Locating A School

The Guardian reported yesterday on efforts in Ireland to obtain repeal of the provision in Section 7 of the Equal Status Act 2000 which allows state-funded schools operated by religious institutions to give preference to, or  in some cases limit admission to, members of the denomination sponsoring the school.  Some 90% of state-funded schools in Ireland are run by the Catholic Church. They give preference to students who have been baptized.  Many non-Catholics are finding it extremely difficult to locate a good school for their children.  The main secular schools are run by an organization known as Educate Together.  But its 74 schools do not have enough places for all their applicants. More than 16,000 people have signed a petition that will be presented to Parliament.  They argue that the Equal Status Act provision violates Article 44.2.3 of Ireland's Constitution which prohibits government discrimination on the basis of religion or belief.

Court Rejects Free Exercise Defense In Marijuana Case

MLive reports that Branden James Barnes, who claims to be a medicine man for the Oklevueha Native American Church (ONAC), pleaded guilty on Tuesday in a Michigan federal district court to charges of manufacturing more than 50 marijuana plants.  The plea came after the court rejected arguments by Barnes' attorney that his marijuana production is protected by the 1st Amendment and RFRA. It was contended that in the ONAC, ritual use of marijuana provides a spiritual experience and healing.  Barnes attorney had argued that the changing attitudes toward marijuana, and its legalization in some states, undercuts prior holdings that the state has a compelling interest in regulating the drug. According to the government, ONAC is a scam-- providing a membership card for $200 which it represents allows the holder to freely possess and use controlled substances. The court also rejected Barnes' attempt to file his own appeal separate from the pleadings filed by his attorney. He argued that his attorney had failed to educate herself about ONAC.

Madoff Bankruptcy Trustee Recovers Substantial Amounts For Fraud Victims

According to a filing in federal bankruptcy court in New York this week, many of the victims of the 2008 investment fraud carried out by Bernie Madoff will recover most or all of their losses. Among the victims were a number of Jewish philanthropic organizations. The Jewish Press reported yesterday that court-appointed bankruptcy trustee Irving Picard has recovered, or reached agreements to recover, some $10.9 billion on behalf of victims of the Ponzi scheme. If the court approves the latest distribution proposed by Picard, victims who invested up to $1.61 million with Madoff (1264 out of 2227 victims) will get all of their funds returned. Those who invested more will receive back 57% of their investment.  A number of the Jewish charitable foundations who were victimized each had well over $1.61 million invested. (See prior posting.) The Wall Street Journal reports that this latest payout has been delayed as litigation over how to calculate the losses of some investors has wound its way through the courts.

Canadian Court: Grandparents Have No Right To Force Religious Exposure On Grandchild Over Mother's Objections

In A.R. and B.R. v. M.W. and L.R., (BC Prov. Ct., Oct. 21, 2015), a British Columbia (Canada) Provincial Court rejected an application by paternal grandparents for unsupervised contact time with their 4-year old granddaughter.  The grandparents want to be part of the child's life even though their son (the child's father) has little contact with them or with the child.  The child's mother, however, objects to the grandparents' insistence on taking the child to Jehovah's Witness religious services.  The court rejected the grandparents' claim that their right under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms to free exercise of religion has been infringed, saying:

No one is questioning the applicants’ right to practice their religion. This dispute arises from the applicants’ refusal to accept that they have no say in the religious and spiritual upbringing of A.W. They are not guardians and they do not have any parental responsibilities.

The court limited the grandparents' visits to one hour per month in the mother's home, supervised by the mother.  CBC News reports on the decision.

National Evangelical Group Takes More Flexible Stance On Capital Punishment

The National Association of Evangelicals this week released a new Resolution on Capital Punishment (full text) adopted at its semi-annual meeting.  The Resolution recognizes that instead of the previous widespread support for capital punishment, now Evangelical Christians differ in their beliefs as to whether capital punishment should be a part of American law.  The Resolution offers arguments both for and against the death penalty, saying in part:

As evangelicals, we believe that moral revulsion or distaste for the death penalty is not a sufficient reason to oppose it. But leaders from various parts of the evangelical family have made a biblical and theological case either against the death penalty or against its continued use in a society where biblical standards of justice are difficult to reach. In Mosaic Law, standards of evidence were stringent, requiring a minimum of two eyewitnesses who were willing to stake their own lives on the truthfulness of their testimony and who would initiate the execution by “casting the first stone.” Circumstantial evidence was not permitted. The contemporary American system is unlikely to reach such standards of evidence, and given the utter seriousness of capital crimes, the alarming frequency of post-conviction exonerations leads to calls for radical reform....

Other evangelicals continue to support the death penalty in limited circumstances as a legitimate exercise of the state’s responsibility to administer justice, and as a deterrent to crime. They point to heinous crimes, such as mass murder, terrorism, and the abduction, rape and murder of a young child, in which the perpetrator is caught on camera or is seen by multiple witnesses, where the evidence is overwhelming and there are no issues of mental incompetency. In such cases, some evangelicals argue for swift prosecution, with necessary safeguards, and if appropriate application of the death penalty as the best way to render justice, deter future crimes and allow the victim’s family and community to heal.

In France, Marie Le Pen's Trial For Inciting Hatred Towards Muslims Begins

In Lyon, France, yesterday, the trial of Marine Le Pen, leader of the far right National Front Party began.  As reported by The Guardian and The Local, Le Pen is charged with "incitement to discrimination, violence or hatred towards a group of people on the basis of their religion" in a suit brought by four human rights groups. During the campaign in 2010 to take over leadership of the National Front Party from her father, Le Pen complained about Muslims praying in the streets in three French cities where there are shortages of mosques.  She said:

I’m sorry, but for those who really like to talk about the second world war, if we’re talking about occupation, we can also talk about this while we’re at it, because this is an occupation of territory. It’s an occupation of swaths of territory, of areas in which religious laws apply … for sure, there are no tanks, no soldiers, but it’s an occupation all the same and it weighs on people.

In court, the French State Prosecutor recommended that the judges find Le Pen's remarks protected by her freedom of expression.

Church Sues Seeking Use of Public Housing Community Rooms For Worship Services

Last week, a Christian church in Lansing, Michigan filed a federal lawsuit challenging the policy of the Lansing Housing Commission on use of community rooms in public housing developments. The Commission bars use of the rooms for religious worship services, while allowing them to be used by religious and non-religious groups for other activities.  The complaint (full text) in His Healing Hands Church v. Lansing Housing Commission, (WD MI, filed 10/14/2015), says that it will shortly be too cold in Michigan for the church to hold services outside as it is now doing.  The lawsuit contends that the city has violated the Establishment Clause as well as the  church's free speech, free exercise, and equal protection rights. An ADF press release announced the filing of the lawsuit.

Death Count From Hajj Stampede Now Believed To Be Over 2,100

AP reported yesterday that its research shows the death toll from the Sept. 24 crush of mobs outside Mecca during this year's Hajj (see prior posting) has now risen to at least 2,121.  The data comes from comments by officials from some 30 of the countries that sent pilgrims to Saudi Arabia.  The largest number of those killed were from Iran which says it had 465 fatalities. Iran has blamed the deaths on the Saudi royal family.

Anti-Gay Westboro Baptist Church Pickets Anti-Gay Marriage Kim Davis

In a move that puzzled some observers, four members of the Kansas-based Westboro Baptist Church yesterday picketed near the Rowan County, Kentucky courthouse.  Westboro, known for its virulent anti-gay rhetoric, was protesting Kim Davis, the Kentucky county clerk who has gained notice for her refusal to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples. According to the Louisville Courier-Journal, a Westboro spokesperson Shirley Phelps-Roper said that Westboro objected to the fact that Davis is divorced and remarried.  Phelps-Roper said:

This woman wants to say that her sin isn’t as grievous as the same-sex marriage sin.  It’s all sin. It’s all awful. But her sin enabled that sin. When you look up, and all the Christians have given over the moral high ground, what voice do they have left?

She also argued that Kim Davis should nevertheless follow the law and issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples, saying: "God hates oath breakers just like he hates adultery and he hates same-sex marriage."

Science Faculty Charge University With Discrimination Against Muslims

According to yesterday's New Orleans Times-Picayune, a faculty member in the Department of Natural Sciences at Southern University at New Orleans has filed a complaint with the EEOC charging that the University discriminated against Muslim faculty and job applicants.  Professor Ibrahim Ekaidi and a Muslim colleague, Bashir Atteia, were removed from a hiring committee because they collaborated on the ratings they gave to certain candidates. They rated two Muslim candidates for positions in department among the three highest; however other members of the hiring committee also ranked them high.  The chairman of the department removed the names of the two applicants from the list of those being considered and denied them interviews. When Ekaidi and his colleague protested their removal from the committee, the department chair recommended that they resign from the faculty.

Zambia Tries To Solve Financial Crisis Through Day of Prayer

Zambia observed yesterday as a national day of fasting and prayer for recovery of the value of the country's currency, the Kwacha.  According to RT News, President Edgar Lungu called for the day of prayer after the value of the Kwacha dropped 45% against the dollar this year.  A global drop in commodity prices affected the country's main export-- copper, while lack of rain has caused hydroelectric plants to cut electricity by up to 14 hours per day. In a speech yesterday, Lungu said:

I personally believe that since we humbled ourselves and cried out to God, the Lord has heard our cry.  I appeal to all of you to do your best and leave the rest to God.

However, the managing director at Sub-Saharan Consulting Group Zambia, Trevor Simumba, observed:

No matter how many prayers you make it doesn’t change the fact that you have a fiscal deficit and you’re not doing anything to reduce that fiscal deficit. We know God can do miracles, but He cannot change things that are facts on the ground.

Recent Articles and Books of Interest

From SSRN:

• Travis Gasper, A Religious Right to Discriminate: Hobby Lobby and 'Religious Freedom' as a Threat to the LGBT Community, (Texas A&M Law Review, Forthcoming).
• Gila Stopler,The Challenge of Strong Religion in the Liberal State, (32(2) Boston University International Law Journal 411-448 (2014)).
• Joel Harrison & Patrick Parkinson, Freedom Beyond the Commons: Managing the Tension between Faith and Equality in a Multicultural Society, ((2014) 40 Monash University Law Review 413).
• Joel Harrison, Debating Rights and Same-Gender Relationships, (October 12, 2015).
• Jack Tsen-Ta Lee, Equality and Singapore's First Constitutional Challenges to the Criminalization of Male Homosexual Conduct, (Asia-Pacific Journal on Human Rights and the Law, vol 16(1-2), pp 150-185 (2015)).
• Stephen F. Befort & Michael Vargas, Same-Sex Marriage and Title VII, (Santa Clara Law Review, Vol. 56, 2015).
• Virgemarie A. Salazar, Islamic Perspectives on Democracy, (December 3, 2014).
• Jennifer Ann Urban, Islamic Financing - A Successful Takeoff or a Crash Landing? Whether or Not Islamic Financing Should Be Used to Finance and Lease Aircraft, (2015).
• Virgemarie A. Salazar, Theocracy in Iran: From an Ideology to an Islamic Republic, (February 1, 2014).

From SmartCILP:

• Isabelle R. Gunning, Lawyers of All Faiths: Constructing Professional Identity and Finding Common Ground, [Abstract], 39 Journal of the Legal Profession 231-272 (2015).
• Sr. Helen PreJean, Letter To a Law Student, Dear Young Person, 8 DePaul Journal for Social Justice 151-160 (2015).

Recent Books:

• John  Witte, Jr., The Western Case for Monogamy Over Polygamy, (Cambridge Univ. Press, May 2015).
• Robin Griffith-Jones & Mark Hill (eds.), Magna Carta, Religion and the Rule of Law, (Cambridge Univ. Press, April 2015).
• John Slight, The British Empire and the Hajj 1865-1956, (Harvard Univ. Press, Sept. 2015).
• John L. Esposito, Tamara Sonn & John O. Voll, Islam and Democracy after the Arab Spring, (Oxford Univ. Press, Nov. 2015).

Article Traces Church Where Teen Killed By Parents and Others In Counseling Session

An AP report yesterday reviews developments this week in upstate New York in the beatings of two teens by their parents and other members of the Word of Life Christian Church:

Six church leaders and parishioners now face charges including manslaughter and assault for a brutal beating in the sanctuary last Sunday that left 19-year-old Lucas Leonard dead and his 17-year-old brother Christopher hospitalized. Church members Bruce and Deborah Leonard, parents of the victims, face the most serious charge, manslaughter. Deborah Leonard's daughter, Sarah Ferguson, and Joseph Irwin, both face assault charges.

Police say the beatings arose out of a "counseling session" that may have been related to Lucas Leonard wanting to leave the church.

Apparently over the years the Church, which now has only some 20 members, has changed, and the AP article traces this history.

Churches Sue In Challenge To California Mandate For Health Insurance Abortion Coverage

In California yesterday, three churches filed  suit against the California Department of Managed Health Care (DMHC) to prevent enforcement against those who object on religious grounds of a requirement that most health insurance policies issued in California provide coverage for abortions.  The complaint (full text) in Foothill Church v. Rouillard, (ED CA, filed 10/16/2015) focuses on a letter (full text) sent to insurance companies last year reminding them that

the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975 ... requires the provision of basic health care services and the California Constitution prohibits health plans from discriminating against women who choose to terminate a pregnancy. Thus, all health plans must treat maternity services and legal abortion neutrally.

ADF issued a press release announcing the filing of the lawsuit and tracing prior administrative complaints about DMHC's action.

British Agency Orders Government Funded Jewish High School To Change Admission Requirement

In Britain, the government's Office of the Schools Adjudicator has required London's Hasmonean High School, a government-funded Orthodox Jewish high school, to change its admission requirements.  The Jewish Press reports that OSA's action comes in response to a complaint from parents about the requirement that a rabbi certify that students' families have observed at least 3 of 5 specific religious requirements during the past year.  One of the 5 is the observance of the laws of family purity. The OSA held that this inquiry could be embarrassing or intrusive for some families and could not be assessed objectively.

Minority Religious Groups Sue In Nation of Georgia Challenging Unequal Tax Obligations

In the nation of Georgia, eight religious organizations have filed a lawsuit with the Constitutional Court challenging the favorable tax treatment given to the Georgian Orthodox Church.  Democracy & Freedom Watch reports on the suit, brought by Catholic, Baptist, Muslim, Seventh Day Adventist and three other Christian groups.  The lawsuit contends that regulations which require petitioners to pay income and property taxes from which the Orthodox Church is exempt violate the equality protections of Article 14 Georgia's Constitution.

European Court Says Armenian Genocide Denial Protected By Freedom of Expression

In Case of Perincek v. Switzerland, (ECHR, Oct. 15, 2015), the European Court of Human Rights in a Grand Chamber judgment, by a vote of 10-7, held that Switzerland violated Art. 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights (freedom of expression) when it criminally convicted the head of the Turkish Workers Party of violating Swiss law when he, at three public events in Switzerland, denied the 1915 Armenian genocide.  Swiss courts found Doğu Perinçek guilty of violating Art. 261 of the Swiss Criminal Code which, among other things, criminalizes denying, trivializing or seeking justification for genocide or other crimes against humanity. The European Court, finding his conviction in violation of the Convention, said in part in its majority opinion:

Taking into account ... that the applicant’s statements bore on a matter of public interest and did not amount to a call for hatred or intolerance, that the context in which they were made was not marked by heightened tensions or special historical overtones in Switzerland, that the statements cannot be regarded as affecting the dignity of the members of the Armenian community to the point of requiring a criminal law response in Switzerland, that there is no international law obligation for Switzerland to criminalise such statements, that the Swiss courts appear to have censured the applicant for voicing an opinion that diverged from the established ones in Switzerland, and that the interference took the serious form of a criminal conviction – the Court concludes that it was not necessary, in a democratic society, to subject the applicant to a criminal penalty in order to protect the rights of the Armenian community at stake in the present case.

State Department Releases 2014 International Religious Freedom Report

Yesterday the U.S. State Department released its International Religious Freedom Report for 2014.  The Report details the state of religious freedom in each of nearly 200 countries. Each country report contains 4 sections: religious demography; status of government respect for religious freedom; status of societal respect for religious freedom; and U.S. government policy.

Both Secretary of State John Kerry (full text) and Ambassador-at-Large for International Religious Freedom David Saperstein (full text) delivered remarks at a news conference announcing the release. Ambassador Saperstein summarized the report's findings:

A number of trend lines stood out in this year’s report. The first one ... is the single greatest challenge to religious freedom worldwide, or certainly the single greatest emerging challenge, and that is the abhorrent acts of terror committed by those who falsely claim the mantle of religion to justify their wanton destruction.

In both Iraq and Syria, Daesh has sought to eliminate anyone daring to deviate from its own violent and destructive interpretation of Islam.... Similarly, Boko Haram has killed thousands in both indiscriminate violence and deliberate attacks on Christians and Muslims who oppose its radical ideology. It has subjected the peoples of Nigeria, Cameroon, Chad, Niger, to unspeakable acts of terror, sexual violence, abductions, and fatal attacks on places of worship.

Secondly, the impact of blasphemy laws and apostasy laws in countries including Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Sudan, and in a number of others – as well as laws that purport to protect religious sentiments from offense.... The existence of such laws has been used in some countries as pretext to justify violence in the name of religion to create an atmosphere of impunity for those resorting to violence and/or leads to false claims of blasphemy.

Third, repressive governments routinely subject their citizens to violence, detention, discrimination, undue surveillance, for simply exercising their faith or identifying with a religious community. We see this dramatized by the plight of countless numbers of prisoners of conscience..... Many governments have used the guise of confronting terrorism or extremism to broadly repress religious groups for nonviolent religious activities, or by imposing broad restrictions on religious life.

Catholic Orphanages In India End Adoption Services In Protest Over New Government Policies

Catholic Review and CNS reported this week that in India, the Missionaries of Charity-- a religious order that operates orphanages across the country-- will no longer offer children for adoption because of its disagreement with new government adoption guidelines.  The organization, founded by Mother Teresa, is asking the government to remove recognition of the 18 of its orphanages that have operated as adoption centers.  Traditionally they have allowed adoption only by married couples.  At issue are guidelines from the federal Ministry of Women and Child Development adopted in July that now require adoption centers to allow adoption by single individuals, apparently including unmarried adults in same-sex relationships, couples living together, and individuals who are divorced or separated. (Under the guidelines, single men  can only adopt boys.)  The Catholic order also objects that potential adoptive parents will be allowed to review the files of up to six children rather than taking the best match as determined by orphanage officials. The new government guidelines are designed to increase the number of adoptions.

Canadian Judge Scolds "Pastafarian" Suing Over Drivers' License Photo

Canada's National Post reported this week on the unfriendly reception given by a Canadian judge to a woman who belongs to the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster who argued that she should be able to wear a colander or a pirate's hat in her drivers' license photo. Isabelle Narayana sued when the Société de l’assurance automobile du Québec told her that only medical or religious exceptions were allowed to the requirement that her photo be taken bareheaded.  Narayana argued that she should have the same right as Muslim women to wear a head covering, and later showed up wearing a headscarf that she said was the costume of a female pirate who happened to be Muslim.  The license bureau took her photo wearing the headscarf and issued her license.  However she insisted on litigating. A Montreal Superior Court judge ruled that her suit was moot since she was issued a license and admonished her:

Too many people implicated in real litigation with consequences that could affect their lives or those of their children or enterprise are waiting their turn in court for us to be silent about the monopolization of these resources to determine if the plaintiff can be photographed wearing a colander or pirate hat.  We forget too often that the courts are a public service with limited resources that must not be abused.

Appeals Court Affirms Archdiocese's Right To Close Local Church

In Roman Catholic Archbishop of Boston v. Rogers, (MA App., Oct. 14, 2015), the Appeals Court of Massachusetts affirmed the trial court's entry of an injunction against former parishioners of Frances X. Cabrini Church in Scituate. (See prior posting.) The Archdiocese had announced plans to close the church and deconsecrate it.  Parishioners who object to those plans have conducted a 24-hour vigil in the church building for over ten years.  The court affirmed the trial court's findings that the parishioners are intentionally trespassing in the church which, under principles of secular law, is owned by the Archdiocese. The court refused to consider defendant's claim that they are equitable owners of the church under canon law.  Boston Globe reports on the decision. [Thanks to Tom Rutledge for the lead.]

3rd Circuit: Challenge To NYPD Muslim Surveillance Program May Move Forward

Yesterday the U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals in Hassan v. City of New York, (3d Cir., Oct. 13, 2015), reversed a New Jersey federal district court (see prior posting) and held that Muslim plaintiffs adequately stated free exercise and equal protection claims challenging the NYPD's Muslim surveillance program. Summarizing its holding, the court in an opinion by Judge Ambro said:

In its narrowest form, this appeal raises two questions: Do Plaintiffs—themselves allegedly subject to a discriminatory surveillance program—have standing to sue in federal court to vindicate their religious-liberty and equal protection rights? If so, ..., have they stated valid claims under the First and Fourteenth Amendments to our Constitution? Both of these questions, which we answer yes, seem straightforward enough. Lurking beneath the surface however, are questions about equality, religious liberty, the role of courts in safeguarding our Constitution, and the protection of our civil liberties and rights equally during wartime and in peace.

In concluding that plaintiffs have standing, the court said in part:

The City ... argues that Plaintiffs have suffered no injury-in-fact because it has not overtly condemned the Muslim religion.... This argument does not stand the test of time. Our Nation’s history teaches the uncomfortable lesson that those not on discrimination’s receiving end can all too easily gloss over the “badge of inferiority” inflicted by unequal treatment itself. Closing our eyes to the real and ascertainable harms of discrimination inevitably leads to morning-after regret.

Reflecting on history's lessons, the court said:

What occurs here in one guise is not new. We have been down similar roads before. Jewish-Americans during the Red Scare, African-Americans during the Civil Rights Movement, and Japanese-Americans during World War II are examples that readily spring to mind. We are left to wonder why we cannot see with foresight what we see so clearly with hindsight—that “[l]oyalty is a matter of the heart and mind[,] not race, creed, or color...

Judge Roth filed a short concurring opinion on the issue of level of scrutiny that should be applied.  She said in part:

I differ from the majority in its failure to determine whether “intermediate scrutiny” or “strict scrutiny” applies here....

In my opinion, “intermediate scrutiny” is appropriate here. I say this because “intermediate scrutiny” is the level applied in gender discrimination cases. I have the immutable characteristic of being a woman. I am happy with this condition, but during my 80 years on this earth, it has caused me at times to suffer gender discrimination. My remedy now for any future gender discrimination would be reviewed with“intermediate scrutiny.” For that reason, I cannot endorse a level of scrutiny in other types of discrimination cases that would be stricter than the level which would apply to discrimination against me as a woman.

AP reports on the decision.

Court Upholds Military Reprimand To Enlistee For Objecting To Same-Sex Wedding

In Wilson v. James, (D DC, Oct. 13, 2015), the D.C. federal district court dismissed RFRA, 1st and 5th Amendment and various other challenges by an enlisted member of the Utah Air National Guard to letters of reprimand he received for his opposition to a same-sex wedding ceremony held at West Point's chapel.

After reading about the wedding ceremony, Layne Wilson, a Mormon, sent an e-mail using his military account to a major whom he believed to be the chaplain at the U.S. Military Academy, saying in part: "Our base chapels are a place of worship and this [is] a mockery to God and our military core values." His commander issued a letter of reprimand for this, which led to Wilson to rebuke his commander on Facebook, posting: "You embarrass me, our country, and our unit!!!...." That led to a second letter of reprimand and suspension of Wilson's security clearance. Wilson sued, bringing, in the court's words, "a bevy of claims." Rejecting Wilson's RFRA claim, the court said in part:

A substantial burden on one’s religious beliefs—as distinct from such a burden on one’s exercise of religious beliefs—does not violate RFRA....

Admittedly, the First LOR likely chilled Plaintiff’s speech regarding his religious beliefs, especially within the military setting. But nowhere does Plaintiff assert that LDS doctrine requires him to publicly voice his dissent about homosexuality or same-sex marriage.... Plaintiff only contends that, under LDS doctrine, homosexuality is a sin.... His religious belief, however, does not become a protected religious exercise under RFRA simply because Plaintiff expressed it through speech.

Rejecting Wilson's free speech claim, the court held:

An email from an enlisted member of the military that protests the decision of a senior military official outside the sender’s chain of command and urges that official to reverse his decision receives no First Amendment protection.

Judicial Ethics Complaint Cites Alabama Justice's Remarks On Same-Sex Marriage Precedent

The Southern Poverty Law Center yesterday filed an ethics complaint (full text) with the Judicial Inquiry Commission of Alabama alleging that Alabama Supreme Court Justice Tom Parker violated the state's Code of Judicial Ethics when, in a radio interview, he suggested that the Alabama Supreme Court defy the U.S. Supreme Court's Obergefell decision legalizing same-sex marriage. As summarized by an SPLC press release:

The complaint cites comments made by Parker during an Oct. 6 radio show, “Focal Point,” hosted by Bryan Fischer of the American Family Association. Fischer has used his radio show to promote outrageous, denigrating claims about LGBT people, Muslims, Native Americans and African Americans.

In the interview, Parker not only discussed a marriage equality case pending before the Alabama Supreme Court – Ex parte State v. King – he voiced his personal opinion about the case and suggested that Alabama should defy the U.S. Supreme Court decision legalizing same-sex marriage in order to lead to a “revival of what we need in this country.”

Thailand Bans Movie Critical of Buddhist Monks

Al Jazeera today reports that Thailand's culture ministry has banned Arbat, a new horror film about Buddhist monks. The title translates as "violations committed by monks."  Somchai Surachatri, spokesman for Thailand's National Office of Buddhism, said: "The movie has some scenes that will destroy Buddhism. If it is shown, people's faith in Buddhism will deteriorate," The film's producer says it will change some parts of the movie before resubmitting it for approval. Thailand's monks have come under increasing criticism in recent years for their embrace of commercialism.

European Court Says Christian Proselytizer's Rights Infringed By Broadcast Documentary

The European Court of Human Rights today in a Chamber Judgment in Bremner v. Turkey (ECHR, Oct. 13, 2015) (full text of decision in French) held that Dion Bremner, an Australian newspaper correspondent and Christian bookstore employee, had his rights violated by a Turkish television station which broadcast a documentary about his Christian proselytizing.  The producers of the broadcast alerted police and criminal charges of insulting God and Islam were brought against Bremner,  He was ultimately acquitted, Bremner then sued the television producer and presenter, and on appeal the European Court found he was entitled to damages.  As summarized by the European Court's press release on the decision, the Court:

held, unanimously, that there had been: a violation of Article 8 (right to respect for private life) of the European Convention on Human Rights. The case concerned the broadcasting of a television documentary in which the applicant, Mr, Bremner, who was shown promoting his evangelical Christian beliefs, was described as a “foreign pedlar of religion” engaged in covert activities in Turkey. The Court found in particular that the broadcasting of Mr Bremner’s image without blurring it could not be regarded as a contribution to any debate of general interest for society, regardless of the degree of public interest in the question of religious proselytising.

[Thanks to Paul de Mello for the lead.]

Obama Reflects On Christianity

The New York Review of Books (Nov. 5 issue) published a conversation between President Obama and prize-winning author Marilynne Robinson which included this exchange on religion:

The President: ... [O]ne of the points that you’ve made in one of your most recent essays is that there was a time in which at least reformed Christianity in Europe was very much “the other.” And part of our system of government was based on us rejecting an exclusive, inclusive—or an exclusive and tightly controlled sense of who is part of the community and who is not, in favor of a more expansive one.

Tell me a little bit about how your interest in Christianity converges with your concerns about democracy.

Robinson: Well, I believe that people are images of God. There’s no alternative that is theologically respectable to treating people in terms of that understanding.... 

The President: But you’ve struggled with the fact that here in the United States, sometimes Christian interpretation seems to posit an “us versus them,” and those are sometimes the loudest voices. But sometimes I think you also get frustrated with kind of the wishy-washy, more liberal versions where anything goes.

Robinson: Yes.

The President: How do you reconcile the idea of faith being really important to you and you caring a lot about taking faith seriously with the fact that, at least in our democracy and our civic discourse, it seems as if folks who take religion the most seriously sometimes are also those who are suspicious of those not like them?

Pregnancy Centers Sue To Enjoin California's New Mandatory Disclosure Law

Last Friday, California Governor Jerry Brown signed into law AB 775 , the Reproductive FACT Act which requires reproductive health clinics to disseminate a notice to all clients stating that California has public programs that provide immediate free or low-cost access to comprehensive family planning services, prenatal care, and abortion, for eligible women.  On Saturday, the Pacific Justice Institute (press release) on behalf of two religiously affiliated non-profit pregnancy counseling centers filed a lawsuit seeking to enjoin enforcement of the new law.  The complaint (full text) in A Woman's Friend Pregnancy Resource Center v. Harris, (ED CA, filed 10/10/2015) contends that the new law infringes plaintiffs' free speech and free exercise rights by mandating speech inconsistent with their religious convictions.  The Sacramento Bee reports on the lawsuit.

Charges Against Sikh Teen For Wearing Kirpan Dropped

Last week, a New York state trial court judge in Queens dropped criminal charges against a 17-year old Sikh high school student who had been arrested for wearing his kirpan (ceremonial dagger).  According to Sikh24, Virender Singh was arrested and charged with two counts of criminal possession of a weapon in the 4th degree while he was walking to a Gurdwara to offer evening prayers. However at his hearing, prosecutors conceded that charges should be dropped.

Proposed Montana Rules Will Exclude Religious Schools From Tax Credit Program

Last month, the Montana Department of Revenue issued proposed rules (full text) to implement the state's recently-enacted School Contributions Tax Credit law (full text) (background).  Under the law, a state income tax credit of up to $150 is available for contributions to student scholarship organizations that provide scholarships for students at a "qualified educational provider."  One of the proposed new rules would precluded religious schools from participation in the program.  Proposed Rule I provides:

(1) A "qualified education provider" has the meaning given in 15-30-3102, MCA, and pursuant to 15-30-3101, MCA, may not be:

(a) a church, school, academy, seminary, college, university, literary or scientific institution, or any other sectarian institution owned or controlled in whole or in part by any church, religious sect, or denomination; or

(b) an individual who is employed by a church, school, academy, seminary, college, university, literary or scientific institution, or any other sectarian institution owned or controlled in whole or in part by any church, religious sect, or denomination when providing those services.

(2) For the purposes of (1), "controlled in whole or in part by a church, religious sect, or denomination" includes accreditation by a faith-based organization

A hearing on the proposed rules will be held on Nov. 5. Written comments on the proposed rules may be submitted until Nov. 17.  Montana Watchdog raises constitutional questions about the exclusion of religiously sponsored educational institutions.

Marine Base Will Not Remove Sign Calling For God's Blessing

AP reported yesterday that the commander of the Marine corps base on Oahu, Hawaii has rejected a call by the Military Religious Freedom Foundation that the military move or take down a sign put up after 9-11 which reads: "God bless the military, their families and the civilians who work with them." MRFF head Mikey Weinstein says the group represents 72 marines on the base, and wants the sign removed or moved to the grounds of the base chapel.  Alternatively Weinstein proposes that other signs be put up alongside this one, reading, for example, "Goddess bless...."  MRFF says that the current sign violates the Establishment Clause.

Recent Articles of Interest

From SSRN:

• Anthony Michael Kreis, Marriage Demosprudence, (University of Illinois Law Review, Forthcoming).
• Jeff Berryman, Intersections of Canadian Common Law Doctrine and the New Multiculturalism, (March 1, 2014).
• Richard W. Garnett, The Freedom of the Church: (Toward) an Exposition, Translation, and Defense, (Micah Schwartzman, Chad Flands, and Zoe Robinson, eds., The Rise of Corporate Religious Liberty (Oxford University Press, 2015), Forthcoming).
• Ram Rivlin, Religious Norms between Ethics and Law: The Death and Afterlife of Jewish Divorce Law, (Oxford Journal of Law and Religion 2015, Forthcoming).
• Gila Stopler, Biopolitics and Reproductive Justice: Fertility Policies between Women's Rights and State and Community Interests, (18(2) University of Pennsylvania Journal of Law and Social Change, 169-207 (2015)).
• Greg Taylor, Austria's Law Against Defamation of Religion: A Case Study, (Journal of Law and Religion, Vol. 30, No. 1, 2015).
• Ruth Lapidoth, Jerusalem and the Peace Process, (October 7, 2015).
• Patrick Parkinson, Can Marriage Survive Secularization?, (University of Illinois Law Review, 2015, Forthcoming).
• Catherine Powell, Up from Marriage: Freedom, Solitude, and Individual Autonomy in the Shadow of Marriage Equality, (84 Fordham Law Review 69 (2015)).

From SmartCILP:

• David L. Faigman, Where Law and Science (and Religion?) Meet, 93 Texas Law Review 1659-1679 (2015).
• Mark Strasser, Old Wine, Old Bottles, and Not Very New Corks: On State RFRAs and Free Exercise Jurisprudence, 34 St. Louis University Public Law Review 335-366 (2015).
• Allan W. Vestal, The Lingering Bigotry of State Constitution Religious Tests, 15 University of Maryland Journal of Race, Religion, Gender & Class 55-120 (2015).
• John Witte, Jr., Why Two In One Flesh? The Western Case for Monogamy Over Polygamy, 64 Emory Law Journal 1675-1746 (2015).
• Symposium. Religious Accommodation in the Age of Civil Rights. Foreword by Martha Minow; articles by Mary Anne Case, Richard W. Garnett, Malick W. Ghachem, Michael A. Helfand, John D. Inazu, Andrew Koppelman, Melissa Murray, Steven D. Smith and Nomi Maya Stolzenberg. 88 Southern California Law Review 453-767 (2015).

Promissory Estoppel May Prevent Christian Camp From Firing Employee For Living With Her Boyfriend

Trehar v. Brightway Center, Inc.,, (OH App., Oct. 2, 2015), is a suit by a former employee of a Christian youth sports camp who was fired for moving in with with her boyfriend.  Plaintiff Jennifer Trehar whose job involved writing grant proposals and engaging in various sorts of promotional work was told in a letter from the camp's board: "We simply cannot reconcile our affections and appreciation for you with our belief that living together outside marriage is forbidden by the Scriptures."  In a unanimous decision the appeals court reversed the trial  court's grant of summary judgment to the camp, finding that Trehar sould be able to move ahead with her claim of promissory estoppel:

Griffin is Brightway’s president and CEO. He stated that his employees should rely on his statements and promises. In construing the evidence in Trehar’s favor, reasonable people could conclude that Trehar’s boss and the president of the company induced Trehar to believe that no adverse employment action would result from her move.

Columbus Dispatch reports on the decision.

Recent Prisoner Free Exercise Cases

In Christian Separatist Church Societyy of Ohio v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Corrections, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 134125 (SD OH, Oct. 1, 2015), an Ohio federal magistrate judge recommended allowing various individual inmates to proceed with their complaint that by having only one recognized Protestant organization, prison officials have infringed their free exercise rights under the 1st Amendment and RLUIPA. Plaintiffs claim their separatist beliefs are theologically distinct and inimical to those of the recognized group. However the church itself lacks standing to bring a RLUIPA claim. Various other claims were also recommended for dismissal.

In Aragon v. Erlanger, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 134656 (D CO, Oct. 1, 2015), a Colorado federal district court adopted in part a magistrate's recommendation (2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96185, July 23, 2015), a Colorado federal district court dismissed complaints by a Messianic Jewish inmate regarding the preparation of kosher food and date for observing Passover.

In Etterson v. Newcome, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 135670 (ED VA,Oct. 5, 2015). a Virginia federal district court allowed a former inmate to move ahead with his 1st Amendment damages claim for having been wrongly taken off the Ramadan menu.

In Ishmael v. Oregon Department of Corrections, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 136071 (D. OR, Oct. 6, 2015), an Oregon federal district court dismissed a suit by an African Hebrew Israelite of Jerusalem inmate who complained that he was not allowed to use his religious name on mail and correspondence.

In Holmes v. Godinez, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 137388 (ND IL, Oct. 8, 2015), an Illinois federal district court allowed inmates to move ahead with a class action complaining, among other things, that the free exercise and RLUIPA rights of hearing impaired inmates are infringed by inadequate accommodation at religious services.

In Barrett v. Peters, 2015 Ore. App. LEXIS 1203 (OR App., Oct. 7, 2015), an Oregon appellate court allowed an Oregon inmate incarcerated in Florida under the Interstate Corrections Compact to move ahead with his habeas corpus action complaining that he is not allowed to wear the "Celtic tonsure" hair style required by his Glefiosa religion in violation of the Oregon Constitution.

Al-Queda Executes 4 For Witchcraft In Yemen

Al Jazeera reports that in the town of Mayfaa in southeastern Yemen, Al-Queda today distributed and posted flyers saying that the group has killed four local men suspected of witchcraft and sorcery. The handout says in part:

We have implemented Allah's ruling against them, which is the death sentence,  We call upon all Muslims to cooperate with us against this widespread depravity,

Al-Queda controls this area in Yemen.

Federal Prisons Will No Longer Serve Pork Products

The Washington Post reported yesterday that federal Bureau of Prisons is removing all pork products from its national menu for federal inmates. Pork producers are distressed at the decision that was based on a survey of inmates' food preferences, as well as on cost factors.However Ibrahim Hooper, a spokesman for the Council on American-Islamic Relations, predicted that the decision "will stoke the fires of Islamophobia based on the usual conspiracy theories." [Thanks to David Orinoff for the lead.]

Anti-Muslim Rallies Planned In U.S. Cities This Weekend

TPM reports that anti-Muslim rallies may be held this weekend in 20 or more U.S. cities.  The rallies, organized through a Facebook page called "Global Rally for Humanity," were timed to coincide with the 20th anniversary of the Washington, D.C. Million Man March. According to TPM:

 "Global Rally for Humanity" appears to have ties to John Ritzheimer, who rose to prominence among anti-Muslim activists when he organized a protest and "Draw Mohammad" contest in May in Phoenix. Known for his bizarre antics, he recently attracted the attention of U.S. Capitol Police when he vowed in an open letter to arrest Sen. Debbie Stabenow (D-MI) over her support for the Iranian nuclear deal.

Detroit Free Press reports on the rally planned in the heavily Muslim city of Dearborn, Michigan. The Facebook page for the Dearborn rally says that the organizers are open gun carry advocates, and it urges individuals to bring firearms to the rally. The rally is planned near Dearborn city hall after organizers did not file soon enough to get a permit to demonstrate outside the Islamic Center of America, a large Dearborn mosque.

CAIR issued a statement this week reading in part: "Many of these planned rallies may not take place, or they may consist of only a handful of people shouting slurs at worshipers. But given the recent endorsement of Islamophobia by national public figures, it would only be prudent for mosque and community leaders to prepare for any eventuality." In a second statement later in the week, CAIR asked all presidential candidates to repudiate the hate rallies and urged them to visit a mosque the weekend to show moral support for the Muslim community.

Congress Reauthorizes USCIRF For 4 Years In Bill Requiring New Strategic Plan

Yesterday Congress sent to the President for his signature S. 2078, United States Commission on International Religious Freedom Reauthorization Act of 2015 (full text).  The bill extends the life of USCIRF until September 2019, funds it at $3.5 million for each year and creates a compromise arrangement on Commission reforms.  As reported by World News Service:

The bill is close to a clean reauthorization and does not include the reforms [Sen. Marco] Rubio sought in his bill. It also does not include the reforms Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., wanted, elements of which the international religious freedom community said would act as “poison pills” to the commission.

Instead, the legislation gives the commission 60 days to craft a strategic plan and conduct an organizational review. A unanimous commission vote (or a majority of both party appointees) would enact any proposed changes – such as designating ISIS, Boko Haram, and other non-state actors as “countries of particular concern.”

[Thanks to Blog From the Capital for the lead.] 

Malaysia's Federal Court Rules On Procedural Grounds Against Transgender Challenge To State Law

As previously reported, last November a 3-judge appeals court panel in the Malaysian state of  Negeri Sembilan struck down a state law barring Muslim men from wearing women's clothing. The appeal was brought by three transgender women who, a lower court had ruled, were required to wear men's clothing because they were born as males. The state appealed the ruling to Malaysia's Federal Court which yesterday set aside on procedural grounds the appeals court's November ruling. According to Free Malaysia Today, a five-judge panel of the Federal Court ruled that the challenge to the statute should have been decided initially by the Federal Court, rather than being brought to it on appellate review.