Recent Prisoner Free Exercise Cases

In Pfeil v. Lampert, (10th Cir., Feb. 20, 2015), the 10th Circuit upheld dismissal of an inmate's complaint that on one occasion a volunteer Catholic minister was not allowed to enter to provide services, and that a prison policy banning hardbound books led to confiscation of his religious books which he could not afford to replace or get with the large type font he needs in softbound form.

In Blair v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20751 (ED CA, Feb. 20, 2015), a California federal magistrate judge dismissed (with leave to amend) a Jewish inmate's claim that his temporary placement with a Muslim cellmate violated his free exercise and RLUIPA rights.

In Harris v. Arpaio, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21802 (D AZ, Feb. 23, 2015), an Arizona federal district court dismissed an inmate's complaint that his Bible was confiscated and not replaced and that his request for baptismal services, marriage services and weekly religious services was refused.

In Pevia v. Shearin, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21805 (D MD, Feb. 24, 2015), a Maryland federal district court refused to dismiss a complaint by an inmate that Native American religious services were not regularly scheduled and that he was not permitted to participate or have the services broadcast to him when they did take place.

In Johnson v. Pritchard, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22921 (MD TN, Feb. 24, 2015), a Tennessee federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendations (2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21879, Jan 29, 2015) and allowed plaintiff to proceed with his claims for equitable relief to end a prison policy that precludes indigent inmates from attending Muslim religious feasts when they cannot pay the cost from their personal inmate trust fund accounts.

In Shabazz v. Johnson, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21995 (ED VA, Feb. 24, 2015), a Virginia federal district court ordered further briefing on a claim by a Nation of Islam inmate that he has not received a diet consistent with his religious beliefs, but dismissed his complaints of insufficient NOI religious services, not being able to wear bow ties to religious services and being unable to watch Farrakhan sermons on cable television.

In Hodges v. Brown, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22199 (ED NC, Feb. 20, 2015), a North Carolina federal district court dismissed a complaint by an Orthodox Messianic Jewish inmate regarding the kosher diet policy and practices, but permitted him to move ahead with his complaint regarding outside volunteer requirement for leading congregate worship services.

In Rossi v. Fishcer, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22348 (SD NY, Feb. 24, 2015), a New York federal district court permitted a Nyahbinghi Rastafarian inmate to proceed with claims regarding recognition of four holy days, scheduling services on the correct day and wearing of a turban.  It dismissed claims regarding family events, holy day menus, spiritual advisers, fundraising proceeds, and reporting of plaintiff's marijuana use.

In Sims v. Wegman, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22765 (ED CA, Feb. 24, 2015), a California federal magistrate judge dismissed, with leave to amend, a Nation of Islam inmate's complaint that he was denied kosher meals.

In Baumgarten v. Howard County Department of Corrections, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23112  (D MD, Feb. 25, 2015), a Maryland federal district court dismissed a Jewish inmate's claim that while he was at a detention center his kosher meal requests were inadequately accommodated.

Court Martial Conviction For Refusal To Remove Biblical Quotes From Desk Upheld

In United States v. Sterling, 2015 CCA LEXIS 65 (NMCCA, Feb. 26, 2015), the U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals upheld a court martial conviction of a marine corps member for disobeying a lawful order to remove signs containing Biblical verses that she had taped up around her desk.  According to the court;

appellant's duties included sitting at a desk and utilizing a computer to assist Marines experiencing issues with their Common Access Cards. The appellant printed three copies of the biblical quote "no weapon formed against me shall prosper" on paper in 28 point font or smaller. The appellant then cut the quotes to size and taped one along the top of the computer tower, one above the computer monitor on the desk, and one above the in-box. The appellant testified that she is a Christian and that she posted the quotation in three places to represent the Christian trinity.

The court rejected defendant's free exercise and RFRA defenses, holding:

the definition of a "religious exercise"[in RFRA]  requires the practice be "part of a system of religious belief." ...  Personal beliefs, grounded solely upon subjective ideas about religious practices, "will not suffice" because courts need some reference point to assess whether the practice is indeed religious.... For these reasons, we reject the appellant's invitation to define "religious exercise" as any action subjectively believed by the appellant to be "religious in nature.

Here, the appellant taped a biblical quotation in three places around her workstation, organized in a fashion to "represent the trinity." While her explanation at trial may invoke religion, there is no evidence that posting signs at her workstation was an "exercise" of that religion in the sense that such action was "part of a system of religious belief." 

Court Says Religiously-Affiliated Hospital's Plan Is Exempt From ERISA

Another federal district court has weighed in on whether retirement plans created and maintained by religiously-affiliated hospitals qualify for the "Church Plan" exemption from ERISA.  At issue is statutory language that is ambiguous as to whether a plan must have been created by a church itself in order to qualify for the exemption.  In Lann v. Trinity Health Corp., (D MD, Feb. 24, 2015), a Maryland federal district court resolved the issue in a brief written order referring to reasons the judge stated orally on the record in the case.  The court held that the plan qualifies for the exemption. BNA's Daily Report for Executives [subscription required] says that with this decision, district courts are split 3-3 on the issue. Several of the cases are on appeal.

Study Released On Religious Restrictions and Hostilities

The Pew Research Center on Thursday issued its annual report for 2013 on the extent to which governments around the world restrict religious minorities and the extent to which non-governmental actors engage in social hostillity toward religion.  The report titled Latest Trends in Religious Restrictions and Hostilities finds that:

the share of countries with high or very high levels of social hostilities involving religion dropped from 33% in 2012 to 27% in 2013, the most recent year for which data are available. These types of hostilities run the gamut from vandalism of religious property and desecration of sacred texts to violent assaults resulting in deaths and injuries.

By contrast, the share of countries with high or very high government restrictions on religion stayed roughly the same from 2012 to 2013. The share of countries in this category was 27% in 2013, compared with 29% in 2012. Government restrictions on religion ... [range] from registration requirements to discriminatory policies and outright bans on certain faiths....

As in previous years, Christians and Muslims – who together make up more than half of the global population – faced harassment in the largest number of countries. Christians were harassed, either by government or social groups, in 102 of the 198 countries included in the study (52%), while Muslims were harassed in 99 countries (50%).

In recent years, there has been a marked increase in the number of countries where Jews were harassed. In 2013, harassment of Jews, either by government or social groups, was found in 77 countries (39%)– a seven-year high. Jews are much more likely to be harassed by individuals or groups in society than by governments.

(See prior related posting.)

Secularist Blogger Hacked To Death By Islamists In Bangladesh

In Dhaka, Bangladesh on Thursday night, the Bangladeshi-American blogger Avijit Roy was hacked to death by machetes and meat cleavers in an attack by an Islamist group that objects to his secularist postings on science, religion and LGBT issues on his blog Mukto-Mona (Free-mind).  Roy's wife, Rafida Ahmed, was also attacked and lost a finger.  The Guardian reports that Roy, a Hindu and a strong voice against religious fanaticism, had been receiving threats for some time and that a Facebook posting warned that he would be killed once he arrived in Bangladesh from the United States. After the attack, a group identifying itself as Ansar Bangla 7 Tweeted: "Anti-Islamic blogger US-Bengali citizen Avijit Roy is assassinated in capital #Dhaka due to his crime against #Islam." Several hundred people joined a rally yesterday near the site of the attack carrying banners reading: "We want justice" and "Down with fundamentalism."

3 Senior Faculty Attack Notre Dame's Granting of Benefits To Same-Sex Couples

Three senior faculty members at the University of Notre Dame earlier this week published an interesting attack on the decision by Notre Dame University and some other Catholic institutions to grant same-sex couples who are legally married the same employee benefits available to married heterosexual couples.  The statement (full text) by law professors Gerard V. Bradley and John Finnis and political science professor Daniel Philpott, published on the blog site Public Discourse, says in part:

[W]hen a university’s administration, knowing that “same-sex marriages” are in a Catholic understanding not truly marriages at all, nonetheless gives without legal coercion many signs and solid tokens of approving such commitments to non-marital sex acts, everyone can readily infer that the university actually does not regard any kind of sex acts between adults as grave matter, provided that these acts are consensual and, perhaps, linked to some notion of commitment. This inference and its logic apply to the vast majority of its students whose inclinations are heterosexual, and whose temptations—enhanced by the perceived indifference of the university—are rather to fornication (and pornography and self-abuse) than to sodomy....

The baneful effects of this structure of sin will be difficult to contain. It will be reinforced, for instance, if and when such a university accepts that an open commitment to an unchristian kind of sexual relationship is little or no impediment to being appointed to holding high office and high academic posts in it....

[B]y extending marriage benefits to same-sex couples, a university would directly cooperate in, encourage, and promote the grave injustices committed by those of its employees who, deeming themselves (and being legally deemed) married, will—usually in circumstances utterly remote from emergency rescue of orphans—adopt children. Even worse, some couples may use third-party reproduction to create children with the intent to bring them up motherless (if the couple is male) or fatherless (if the couple is female) and in a domestic educational context of active approval of intrinsically immoral sex. No Christian institution should ever cooperate with such gratuitous wronging of children....

Finally, institutions that assimilate civil same-sex “marriage” into the category of true marriage will lose their credibility in the fight to defend religious freedom against the federal judiciary, powerful currents of influence, and coercive laws.

[Thanks to Mirror of Justice for the lead.]

South Korea's Constitutional Court Invalidates Criminal Adultery Law

By a vote of 7-2 yesterday, South Korea's Constitutional Court struck down the country's 1953 law criminalizing adultery.  The New York Times reports that an opinion joined by 5 of the Justices said that the law has often been misused to force a divorce or blackmail married women. Under the law, cases could be brought under the law only if a spouse brought a complaint, and prosecutors could not continue the case if a spouse chose to drop it. In four previous challenges to the law between 1990 and 2008, the Court had upheld it. Sungkyunkwan, a Confucianist organization, called yesterday's decision deplorable.

ISIS Destroys Ancient Museum and Library Collections In Iraq To Purge Non-Islamic Content

According to a report yesterday from the Daily Mail, in the northern Iraqi city of Mosul ISIS followers have wreaked widespread destruction at museums and libraries to rid them of all non-Islamic content.  Video recently posted on a Twitter account used by ISIS shows extremists using sledge hammers and power drills to destroy priceless ancient statues at the Nineveh Museum, including a winged-bull Assyrian protective deity from the 9th century BCE. On the video, one of the men involved says these were destroyed because they promote idolatry:

The Prophet ordered us to get rid of statues and relics, and his companions did the same when they conquered countries after him.

Meanwhile, it was also disclosed this week that terrorists have blown up the Mosul Public Library, with its collection of Iraqi newspapers for the past century and maps and books from the Ottoman Empire. This comes a month after terrorists loaded 2000 secular books from the library on trucks to be burned because the books supposedly promote infidelity and call for disobeying Allah. There has also been destruction at the archives of a Sunni Muslim library, the libraries of the Latin Church and Monastery of the Dominican Fathers and the Mosul Museum Library. ISIS has threatened the death penalty for anyone who tries to hide books or manuscrpts to save them from destruction-- a tactic that saved many items in the aftermath of the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq in 2003.

Teacher Forced Out For Facebook Posting On Religious Objections To School Billboard Can Sue

Knox v. Union Township Board of Education, (D NJ, Feb. 23, 2015), is a suit by a former tenured special education teacher at a public high school in New Jersey who was suspended after a posting comments on her personal Facebook page expressing her religious disapproval of a school billboard that promoted alternative homosexual lifestyles.  When the school board brought charges seeking to strip her of tenure, the teacher entered a settlement agreement under which she resigned and paid back the salary that she had received during her suspension.  However she reserved her right to sue for statutory and constitutional violations. In this opinion, the court permitted her to proceed with her state and federal constitutional claims of religious discrimination, infringement of free exercise and free speech rights, establishment clause violations and denial of due process. Her claims of racial discrimination and intentional infliction of emotional distress were dismissed.

Austrian Parliament Passes Controversial Amendments To Law On Islam

Austria's Parliament yesterday adopted controversial amendments to the country's 1912 Law on Islam.  As reported by AFP, the new law bans foreign financing of mosques and requires imams to be able to speak German. Its goal is to create an Islam with European character. However the law as adopted did not include a previously proposed requirement for the development of an official German version of the Qur'an. (See prior posting.) The law gives Muslims the right to consult Islamic chaplains on the staffs of hospitals, retirement homes, prisons and the armed forces. It also assures Muslims the right to Halal meals in those institutions and in schools, and permits Muslims to take off of work for Muslim holidays. The Islamic Religious Authority of Austria approved the bill, but other Islamic organizations criticized it as discriminatory. On the other hand, Austria's far-right Freedom Party denounced the law as insufficient.

In an interview with NPR, the Austrian Minister for Foreign Affairs further clarified the law's restrictions on foreign funding of mosques:

We have nothing against one time donations. And these are still allowed. But what we want to reduce is the control. If we have this kind of support, our communities do not have the opportunity to develop freely.

He also said:

[O]ur goal is to have our own Austrian imams. It is necessary for us to show young people that it's possible to be a believing Muslim and a proud Austrian at the same time.

Annual White House Easter Egg Roll Announced

The White House this week announced that the 137th annual White House Easter Egg Roll will be held on April 6, hosted by the President and Michelle Obama.  It is expected that 35,000 people will gather on the South Lawn of the White House for the event. The lottery for tickets ends today at noon.

Court Dismisses Religious and Speech Objections To Requirement That Witness Stand To Be Sworn In

In Pellegrino v. Meredith, (ED CA, Feb. 23, 2015), a California federal magistrate judge dismissed, with leave to amend, a suit for damages against a traffic court judge and the county by Anthony Pellegrino who, as defendant in a traffic case, was told that he must stand while being sworn in as a witness.  Pelligrino refused, telling the court: "I only rise before my Lord and Savior Jesus Christ."  At that point the bailiff escorted Pellegrino outside the courtroom for an hour. When Pellegrino returned he was escorted to the bench area and sworn in before he had a chance to sit down.

The court rejected Pellegrino's free exercise claim, saying that at most he suffered an "insubstantial inconvenience" for refusing to stand.  The court also rejected Pellegrino's claim that his refusal to stand was protected expressive conduct.

The opinion recounts numerous incidents in which Pellegrino harassed government officials, raising frivolous arguments, asking government officials to show him their oath of office, refusing to pay filing fees, and the like.  In dismissing Pellegrino's claims, the court said:

Given the context of the situation, it is clear from this Court’s reading of the complaint that Defendant Meredith viewed Plaintiff’s refusal to stand while taking the oath as another incident in a long line of immature, disrespectful and frivolous protests by Plaintiff throughout his court proceedings.

Transcript Available For SCOTUS Arguments In Abercrombie & Fitch

The full transcript of this morning's Supreme Court arguments in EEOC v. Abercrombie & Fitch Stores is now available from the Court's website. AP reports on the oral arguments in the Title VII religious accommodation case, saying that the Justices seemed to support prospective employee Samantha Elauf's position. At issue is the kind of notice that is needed to be given to an employer before its obligation to try to accommodate religious exercise is triggered.

SCOTUS Will Hear Oral Arguments Today In Abercrombie & Fitch Religious Accommodation Case

The U.S. Supreme Court this morning will hear oral arguments in EEOC v. Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc. (Docket No. 14-86).  In the case,  the 10th Circuit held that there is a strict notice requirement before an employer is required under Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act to accommodate religious beliefs. Merely wearing  hijab to an employment interview did not give notice that a job applicant wore it for religious purposes or needed religious accommodation because of its conflict with Abercrombie's clothing policy. (See prior posting.)  More than a dozen amicus briefs have been filed in the case. Links to all the briefs, as well as to a preview of the arguments, are available from SCOTUSblog.

European Court Says Bulgaria Violated Religious Rights of Muslims By Inadequate Response To Mosque Demonstration

The European Court of Human Rights in a Chamber Judgment yesterday held that Bulgarian authorites violated Muslim worshipers' right to practice their religion by the inadequate response to a demonstration in front of a mosque in the center of Sofia in 2011.  In the demonstration, leaders, members and supporters of the Bulgarian political party Ataka clashed with Muslim worshippers who had gathered for Friday prayer. In Karaahmed v. Bulgaria, (ECHR, Feb. 24, 2015), the court said:

the outcome of the police’s response that day was that a large number of demonstrators were able to stand within touching distance of Banya Bashi mosque, to shout insults at praying worshippers, to engage in threating and provocative gestures and actions, and ultimately to gain access to the mosque. They enjoyed a virtually unfettered right to protest at the mosque that day, while the applicant and the other worshippers had their prayers entirely disrupted. It is plain, therefore, the police’s actions were confined simply to limiting the violence which broke out that day and that no proper consideration was given to how to strike the appropriate balance in ensuring respect for the effective exercise of the rights of the demonstrators and the applicant and the other worshippers.

Novinite reports on the decision.

Settlement Agreed To In NYC Circumcision Regulation Challenge

The New York Observer reported yesterday that New York Mayor Bill DeBlasio's administration has reached a settlement agreement with the ultra-Orthodox Jewish community in a lawsuit (see prior posting) challenging the New York City Health Department's regulations requiring mohels to obtain written consent from parents before using the oral suction method (metzitzah b’peh) of performing a ritual circumcision. Under the settlement agreement reached after long negotiations with rabbinic authorities, the city will use local health care providers to educate the community about the risks of herpes infection in infants. Jewish leaders will help the city identify the mohel who performed the circumcision on any infant who becomes infected with HSV1.  If genetic testing shows the mohel was the source of the infection, the Jewish community will permanently remove him as a mohel, and he will be subject to financial penalties if he continues to perform circumcisions.  However the list of those removed will not be made public.  This arrangement will lead to a settlement of the pending litigation and repeal of the informed consent requirements.

Report Finds Increased Hostility To Religion In America

Earlier this month, Liberty Institute released the 2014 Edition of its publication Undeniable: The Survey of Hostility to Religion in America. It concludes that there has been a 133% increase in religious hostility attacks in the U.S.in the past three years.  The 393-page report surveys legal challenges in four areas: attacks on religious liberty in the public arena; attacks on religious liberty in the schoolhouse; attacks on religious liberty of churches and ministries; and attacks on religious liberty in the military.

Arkansas Law Barring Cities From Expanding LGBT Protections Becomes Law Without Governor's Signature

AP reports that yesterday, Arkansas Governor Asa Hutchinson allowed SB 202 to become law without his signature. The legislation bars local governments from adopting or enforcing anti-discrimination laws that protect classes not covered by the state civil rights law.  The bill is aimed at preventing cities from expanding their anti-discrimination laws to cover discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation.  The bill's sponsor, Sen. Bart Hester, said: "To think we could have different civil rights laws in every city is not realistic and not conducive to a good business environment."  The bill does not bar local governments from expanding non-discrimination policies applicable only to their own employees.

Settlement Requires Michigan City To Allow "Reason Station" Near "Prayer Sation" In City Hall

Yesterday, a federal district court approved a settlement in a suit brought by an atheist who was refused space for a table in the atrium of Warren, Michigan's city hall for a "reason station,"  even though the city had permitted a local pastor to operate a "prayer station" in the atrium since 2009. (See prior posting.) The court's order (full text) in Marshall v. City of Warren, (ED MI, Feb. 23, 2015) requires the city to allow the Reason Station to operate on terms no less favorable than those granted to the Prayer Station. The city must also pay attorneys' fees of $100,000 to the ACLU of Michigan. The ACLU issued a press release calling the settlement "a complete win for our side and for the First Amendment." The Detroit Free Press had additional background.

Suit Against Gym Alleges Religious Discrimination Against Muslim Athlete

A suit alleging religious discrimination in a place of public accommodation was brought in an Ohio federal district court yesterday against an LA Fitness facility in Cincinnati.  The complaint (full text) in Fall v. LA Fitness, (SD OH, filed 2/23/2015), filed by Mohamed Fall, a 28-year old former college basketball star and a practicing Muslim who regularly works out at LA Fitness, alleges that for over a year, after exercising, Fall "customarily retreats to an empty, obscure corner of the men's locker room, next to an empty coat rack, faces the wall and conducts Salat, or prayer, quietly to himself for approximately 5 to 10 minutes." On January 29, while in the middle of prayer, Fall, an immigrant from Senegal, was surrounded by three LA Fitness employees and told management had decided that he could no longer pray anywhere at the gym.  Fall claims he was singled out because he is a Muslim, saying that he has seen non-Muslims at the gym engage in religious prayer and related activities such as making the sign of the cross. WCPO News reports on the lawsuit.

Australian Court Says Polyamory Is Not "Sexual Orientation" Under Sex Discrimination Act

In Bunning v Centacare, (FCCA, Feb. 11, 2015), an Australian Federal Circuit Court judge dismissed a sexual orientation discrimination complaint filed against a Catholic social service agency by former employee Susan Bunning.  Bunning had worked most recently as the agency's Coordinator of Family Support, but was dismissed after it became known that she led a polyamorous lifestyle. She sued under the Sex Discrimination Act 1984.  The court held that plaintiff has no cause of action because polyamory-- the practice of engaging in multiple sexual relationships with the consent of all the people involved-- is sexual behavior, not sexual orientation. Financial Review reports on the decision.

Recent Articles of Interest

From SSRN:

• Pamela Foohey, When Faith Falls Short: Bankruptcy Decisions of Churches,(February 13, 2015).
• Laura Marie Winocur, Competing Visions of the Modern Secular State in Law and Policy, (February 12, 2015).
• Robert T. Miller, Experience Explained: Review of David Skeel's "True Paradox", (U Iowa Legal Studies Research Paper No. 15-02, Jan. 2015).
• Mattheew P. Cavedon, Mere Ultramontanism, (December 14, 2013).
• Mark Cammack, Adriaan Bedner & Stijn Van Huis, Democracy, Human Rights, and Islamic Family Law in Post-Soeharto Indonesia, (New Middle Eastern Studies, Forthcoming).
• Ronald Turner, Title VII and the Roberts Court's Worldview Supremacy, (65 Labor Law Journal 149 (Fall 2014)).
• Hamed Ghoddusi & Sajjad Khoshroo, Islamic Finance and the Energy Sector,(February 16, 2015).
• Ari Z. Bryen, Martyrdom, Rhetoric, and the Politics of Procedure, (Classical Antiquity, Vol. 33, Issue 2, pp. 243–280 (2014)).

From SmartCILP:

• Zachary R. Calo, Carhart Lecture Series. Christianity, Islam, and Secular Law, 39 Ohio Northern University Law Review 879-900 (2013).
• Michelle A. McKinley, Standing On Shaky Ground: Criminal Jurisdiction and Ecclesiastical Immunity In Seventeenth-Century Lima, 1600-1700, 4 UC Irvine Law Review 141-174 (2014).
• Lena Salaymeh, Every Law Tells A Story: Orthodox Divorce In Jewish and Islamic Legal Histories, 4 UC Irvine Law Review 19-63 (2014).
• Christopher Tomlins, Demonic Ambiguities: Enchantment and Disenchantment in Nat Turner's Virginia, 4 UC Irvine Law Review 175-202 (2014).

Will A Supreme Court Decision Legalizing Same-Sex Marriage Apply To Tribal Governments?

Today's New York Times carries an article titled Among the Navajos, a Renewed Debate About Gay Marriage.  The two largest Indian tribes-- the Navajo Nation and the Cherokee Nation-- ban same sex marriage, though at least ten smaller tribes have legalized same-sex unions.  The national debate on the issue is causing some Navajos to consider repealing a 2005 tribal law--  the Dine Marriage Act-- which prohibits same-sex unions on the Navajo reservation. The Times article quotes an expert as saying that even if the Supreme Court decides that bans on same-sex marriage are unconstitutional, this will not affect tribal bans. That conclusion is based on the principle that tribes were not signatories to the Constitution and are not bound by it. The Times article, however, fails to mention the Indian Civil Rights Act which does bind tribal governments.  25 USC Sec. 1302 provides in part:

No Indian tribe in exercising powers of self-government shall... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of its laws or deprive any person of liberty or property without due process of law....

Thus the invalidation of same-sex marriage bans on either 14th Amendment equal protection of due process grounds would appear to demand a similar result under Section 1302.

Recent Prisoner Free Exercise Cases

In Bausman v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20213 (ED CA, Feb. 18, 2015), a California federal magistrate judge allowed a Native American inmate to move ahead with his complaint under RLUIPA that a change in regulations prohibiting possession of certain religious artifacts integral to participation in daily Native American cultural, traditional, ceremonial, and spiritual life substantially burdened his religious exercise.

In Blair v. CDCR, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20751 (ED CA, Feb. 20, 2015), a California federal magistrate judge dismissed a complaint of a Jewish inmate that his temporary placement with a cellmate who was Muslim violated his free exercise and RLUIPA rights.

Judge Reprimanded For Questioning Defendant Over Religious Head Covering

In In re Ladenburg, (WA Commn. on Judicial Conduct, Feb. 20, 2015), the Washington Commission on Judicial Conduct in a consent order reprimanded municipal court judge David Ladenburg for challenging a criminal defendant wearing a fedora in the courtroom for religious reasons. The facts, as stipulated by the parties, showed that the judge told the defendant who said the hat was worn as part of his Jewish belief that he must bring evidence supporting his decision to wear that particular kind of head covering.  The judge threatened otherwise to have it removed.  In defense of his actions, the judge said he was unfamiliar with wearing of a fedora instead of a yarmulke. In 2006, the same judge had been issued an admonishment by the Commission for requiring a Muslim woman wearing a headscarf for religious reasons to remove it or leave his court room. (See prior posting.) The Tacoma News Tribune reports on yesterday's Commission action.

Saudi Artist Sues Watch Company For Appropriating His Hajj Etching

Luxembourg's i24 News reports today that Saudi artist Ahmed Mater has filed suit in France's Grand Instance Court seeking $1.5 million in damages against the watch company, Omega.  Mater says that Omega used his photogravure "Magnetism (Photograuve) III" without his consent in an ad for the company's new Seamaster Aqua Terra watch.  Mater's etching-- intended to suggest pilgrims on Hajj moving around the Kaaba-- shows a black cubic magnet surrounded by neat steel filings.  Omega says its intent was to advertise the watch's anti-magnetic properties.  Mater's lawyers say Omega has led the public to believe that Mater is mocking religion.

In Second Speech On Terrorism, Obama Again Rejects Idea of War With Islam

For the second time this week (see prior posting), President Obama delivered a major speech (full text) on combating terrorism, with significant attention to the relationship of violent extremism and Islam.  Yesterday, addressing an international Summit on Countering Violent Extremism held at the State Department, the President said in part:

[W]e have to confront the warped ideologies espoused by terrorists like al Qaeda and ISIL, especially their attempt to use Islam to justify their violence.  I discussed this at length yesterday.  These terrorists are desperate for legitimacy.  And all of us have a responsibility to refute the notion that groups like ISIL somehow represent Islam, because that is a falsehood that embraces the terrorist narrative. 

At the same time, we must acknowledge that groups like al Qaeda and ISIL are deliberately targeting their propaganda to Muslim communities, particularly Muslim youth.  And Muslim communities, including scholars and clerics, therefore have a responsibility to push back, not just on twisted interpretations of Islam, but also on the lie that we are somehow engaged in a clash of civilizations; that America and the West are somehow at war with Islam or seek to suppress Muslims; or that we are the cause of every ill in the Middle East....

And finally, we have to ensure that our diverse societies truly welcome and respect people of all faiths and backgrounds, and leaders set the tone on this issue.

Groups like al Qaeda and ISIL peddle the lie that some of our countries are hostile to Muslims.  Meanwhile, we’ve also seen, most recently in Europe, a rise in inexcusable acts of anti-Semitism, or in some cases, anti-Muslim sentiment or anti-immigrant sentiment.  When people spew hatred towards others -- because of their faith or because they’re immigrants -- it feeds into terrorist narratives.  If entire communities feel they can never become a full part of the society in which they reside, it feeds a cycle of fear and resentment and a sense of injustice upon which extremists prey.  And we can’t allow cycles of suspicions to tear at the fabric of our countries....  

 Violent extremists and terrorists thrive when people of different religions or sects pull away from each other and are able to isolate each other and label them as “they” as opposed to “us;” something separate and apart.  So we need to build and bolster bridges of communication and trust....

I’d like to close by speaking very directly to a painful truth that’s part of the challenge that brings us here today.  In some of our countries, including the United States, Muslim communities are still small, relative to the entire population, and as a result, many people in our countries don’t always know personally of somebody who is Muslim.  So the image they get of Muslims or Islam is in the news.  And given the existing news cycle, that can give a very distorted impression.  A lot of the bad, like terrorists who claim to speak for Islam, that’s absorbed by the general population.  Not enough of the good -- the more than 1 billion people around the world who do represent Islam, and are doctors and lawyers and teachers, and neighbors and friends....

The world hears a lot about the terrorists who attacked Charlie Hebdo in Paris, but the world has to also remember the Paris police officer, a Muslim, who died trying to stop them.  The world knows about the attack on the Jews at the kosher supermarket in Paris; we need to recall the worker at that market, a Muslim, who hid Jewish customers and saved their lives.  And when he was asked why he did it, he said, “We are brothers.  It's not a question of Jews or Christians or Muslims.  We're all in the same boat, and we have to help each other to get out of this crisis.”

Obama Sends Ash Wednesday and Lunar New Year Greetings

This past Wednesday, President Obama took time to send holiday greetings to two faith groups.  First he issued a statement (full text) marking Ash Wednesday, saying in part:

Today, Michelle and I join our fellow Christians across the country and around the world in marking Ash Wednesday. Lent is a season of sacrifice and preparation, repentance and renewal. Through reflection on the teachings that guide us, we reaffirm our commitment to God and one another -- and we remember those who are suffering, including those persecuted for their faith.

On the same day, the White House Initiative on Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders released a video message from the President (video and full transcript) sending Lunar New Year greetings, saying in part:

Michelle and I send our warmest wishes to everyone celebrating the Lunar New Year here in America and all around the world. I’ll always remember the parades, fireworks, and gatherings that surrounded the Lunar New Year when I was growing up in Hawaii. And now as President, this celebration is a perfect reminder of the many cultures and faiths that make us who we are as Americans.

The President used his message to again urge immigration reform.

Suit Challenges County Resolution Recognizing Christian Pregnancy Services Organization

The ACLU of Northern California earlier this week announced the filing of a state court lawsuit against the county of Calaveras, California on behalf of several residents and taxpayers who object to a resolution passed by the county Board of Supervisors.  The Resolution (full text) as passed in July 2014 recognizes the local Door of Hope pregnancy center "for serving the women of Calaveras County and helping to save the lives of our most vulnerable children." The complaint (full text) in Lavagetto v. County of Calaveras, (CA Super. Ct., filed 2/13/2015) objects to language in the resolution recognizing Door of Hope, among other things, for "enlighten[ing] and strengthen[ing]the lives of women and young women in Calaveras County by inviting them to test and see for themselves the many blessings that can come from living the teachings of Christ." Plaintiffs contend that the resolution favors one religon over another in violation of provisions in the California constitution which bar the establishment of religion and the expenditure of public funds to aid any religious sect.

D.C. Rabbi Pleads Guilty To Voyeurism Charges

In Washington, D.C. Superior Court yesterday, Rabbi Barry Freundel pleaded guilty to 52 counts of voyeurism.  AP reports that the rabbi, charged with videotaping women in the changing room of the National Capital Mikvah, admitted as part of the plea agreement that his secret recording of women began in 2009, sometimes utilizing three cameras at the same time.  A sentencing hearing is scheduled for May 15.

In Kidnapping Trial, Rabbi Argues Torture To Extract Divorce Document From Husband Complies With Jewish Law

Yesterday in federal district court in Trenton, New Jersey the trial of respected Orthodox Rabbi Mendel Epstein, along with his son and two other rabbis, on conspiracy and kidnapping charges began.  As reported by NJ Advance Media, the defendants are charged with arranging the kidnapping and beating of recalcitrant Orthodox Jewish husbands to force them to give their wives a get-- a Jewish divorce document. Wives or their families paid tens of thousands of dollars for the document. Defense attorneys argued that the rabbis were merely following Jewish law. In his opening statement, Epstein's attorney argued that the Jewish community views a husband who refuses to grant his wife a get as being consumed by evil. He continued, that under Jewish law "force and torture can be used until evil leaves the husband's body and he does what he's supposed to do." (See prior related posting.)

Texas Probate Court Holds Same-Sex Marriage Ban Unconstitutional

While the U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals considers whether to hold Texas' same-sex marriage bans unconstitutional (see prior posting), Jurist reports that a Travis County, Texas Probate Court judge in Estate of Powell, (Travis Co. Prob. Ct., Feb. 17, 2015), rather summarily held that Texas Family Code Sec. 2.401 limiting common law marriages to  heterosexual couples is unconstitutional, as are Sec. 6.204(b) and Texas Constitution Art. I, Sec. 32 that invalidate same-sex marriages.  The decision dismissed challenges by other relatives of the deceased, Stella Marie Powell, to a claim by her same-sex partner that she is entitled to Powell's estate.

Obama Closes Summit On Violent Extremism By Speaking About Muslims

President Obama yesterday delivered closing remarks (full text) at the White House Summit on Countering Violent Extremism.  He spoke at length on the relationship of the battle against Al Queda and ISIL to the broader Muslim community, saying in part:

Al Qaeda and ISIL and groups like it are desperate for legitimacy.  They try to portray themselves as religious leaders -- holy warriors in defense of Islam.  That’s why ISIL presumes to declare itself the “Islamic State.”  And they propagate the notion that America -- and the West, generally -- is at war with Islam.  That’s how they recruit.  That’s how they try to radicalize young people.  We must never accept the premise that they put forward, because it is a lie.  Nor should we grant these terrorists the religious legitimacy that they seek.  They are not religious leaders -- they’re terrorists.  (Applause.)  And we are not at war with Islam.  We are at war with people who have perverted Islam.  (Applause.)  

Now, just as those of us outside Muslim communities need to reject the terrorist narrative that the West and Islam are in conflict, or modern life and Islam are in conflict, I also believe that Muslim communities have a responsibility as well.  Al Qaeda and ISIL do draw, selectively, from the Islamic texts.  They do depend upon the misperception around the world that they speak in some fashion for people of the Muslim faith, that Islam is somehow inherently violent, that there is some sort of clash of civilizations. ,,,

[I]f we are going to effectively isolate terrorists, if we're going to address the challenge of their efforts to recruit our young people, if we're going to lift up the voices of tolerance and pluralism within the Muslim community, then we've got to acknowledge that their job is made harder by a broader narrative that does exist in many Muslim communities around the world that suggests the West is at odds with Islam in some fashion....

... Muslim leaders need to do more to discredit the notion that our nations are determined to suppress Islam, that there’s an inherent clash in civilizations.  Everybody has to speak up very clearly that no matter what the grievance, violence against innocents doesn't defend Islam or Muslims, it damages Islam and Muslims.

Pediatrician, "After Much Prayer," Refuses To Treat Lesbian Couple's Infant

The Detroit Free Press yesterday reported on a new arena for religious objections to providing services to same-sex couples.  A suburban Detroit lesbian couple were told by a pediatrician that they had chosen that "after much prayer" she decided that she could not provide medical services to their newborn.  The news was given to the couple by a different staff physician as the mothers sat in the exam room waiting for their newborn's first checkup. The two mothers had previously met with Dr. Venesa Roi and chosen her particularly because of her holistic approach to treating children.  In a subsequent letter to the couple, Roi told them she was sorry that her decision hurt them, but she decided she could not develop the proper personal doctor-patient relationship with them.  She added that they were always welcome in the office to be seen by another physician on staff.  Michigan's Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act does not ban discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, though the ethics rules of the AMA and American Academy of Pediatrics do.

Court Says Florist Violated Washington Public Accommodation Law In Refusing Flowers For Same-Sex Wedding

In State of Washington v. Arlene's Flowers, Inc., (WA Super. Ct., Feb. 18, 2015), a Washington state trial court held that a florist shop violated the Washington Law Against Discrimination and the state's Consumer Protection Act when the shop's owner advised a customer that for religious reasons she could not provide flower arrangements for his same-sex wedding ceremony. (See prior related posting.) The court rejected defendants' argument that application of the law to require the shop to provide flower arrangements for a same-sex wedding violates their free expression and free exercise rights.  Addressing the 1st Amendment speech claim, the court said:

Defendants offer no persuasive authority in support of a free speech exception (be it creative, artistic, or otherwise) to anti-discrimination laws applied to public accommodations.

Defendants' strongest constitutional argument turned on the Washington state constitution's free exercise clause, which gives greater protection than the 1st Amendment.  However the court rejected defendants' claims, concluding that even if the laws impose a substantial burden on defendants' religious exercise, the state has a compelling interest in combating discrimination in public accommodations. The court went on to reject defendants' argument that a more narrowly tailored approach would allow defendants to deny goods and services on the basis of sexual orientation and merely refer the customer to a non-discriminating business.  The court said: "This rule would, of course, defeat the purpose of combatting discrimination...."

Washington state Attorney General Bob Ferguson welcomed the decision, saying: "The law is clear: If you choose to provide a service to couples of the opposite sex, you must provide the same service to same-sex couples."

California Court Says Iranian Forum Would Discriminate Against Women and Non-Muslims

In Aghaian v. Minassian, (CA App., Feb. 17, 2015), a California state appellate court held that Iranian citizens living in the United States should not be required to litigate a dispute with other Iranian citizens over property in Iran in an Iranian court.  Reversing the trial court's forum non conveniens stay of the action in California, the appellate court said:

[T]he evidence is overwhelming that Iranian courts discriminate against women and non-Muslims. Among other things, Plaintiffs submitted evidence that the testimony of a woman counts for half the value of that of a man, and that women are not treated equally before the courts, particularly in personal status matters relating to marriage, divorce, inheritance, and child custody, and only men can serve as judicial officers.... [T]he judiciary in Iran is heavily influenced by religious authorities and ... the law requires the head of the judiciary as well as the prosecutor general and all Supreme Court judges to be high ranking clerics....

Two of the three Plaintiffs here are women and [plaintiffs] family members are not Muslim. Leaving aside whether Iranian courts are independent or corrupt, this is sufficient to show Iran is not a suitable alternative forum. This is the “rare circumstance” in which an alternative forum “provides no remedy at all.”

Los Angeles Metropolitan News-Enterprise reports on the decision.

Fired Atlanta Fire Chief Sues Mayor and City

Today former Atlanta Fire Chief Kevin Cochran filed a federal court lawsuit against Atlanta Mayor Kasim Reed and the City of Atlanta  claiming that Reed's firing of Cochran last month violated Cochran's 1st and 14th Amendment rights. (See prior related posting.)  The 54-page complaint (full text) in Cochran v. City of Atlanta, Georgia, (ND GA, filed 2/18/2015) contends that

[Reed] terminated Cochran for holding historical Christian beliefs about marriage and sexuality and making those views known in a self-published, non-work-related, religious book.

As reported by the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, Cochran's book, titled Who Told You That You Were Naked?: Overcoming the Stronghold of Condemnation, includes passages that describe homosexuality as a "sexual perversion" akin to bestiality. Cochran gave copies of his book to a number of city officials and employees. The suit seeks reinstatement, damages and an end to city policy that requires pre-clearance before employees publish a work.  ADF issued a press release announcing the filing of the lawsuit.

School Drops Required Disclaimer In Settlement of Suit On Student-To-Student Distributions

A suit filed last year (background) against a Loomis, California elementary school was settled last week with the school agreeing to change its policy on student distribution of invitations and flyers.  At issue was a reprimand to a student for handing out invitations to two of her friends for a "Genesis Apologetics" event that would discuss creation and evolution. The school insisted that even though the distribution was outside of class time, the flyers had to be stamped by the school with a disclaimer of sponsorship. According to a press release from Pacific Justice Institute, under the settlement the school will no longer insist on disclaimers on material given from one student to another.

City's Solicitiation Ordinance Held Too Restrictive

In United States Mission Corp. v. City of Mercer Island, (WD WA, Feb. 10, 2015), a Washington federal district court granted a preliminary injunction against enforcement of a Seattle suburb's solicitation ordinance in a suit by a Christian religious organization.  The Mission operates residential facilities for the homeless, and requires its residents to engage in door-to-door religious solicitation on its behalf. The challenged ordinance bars door-to-door solicitations (but not proselytizing without soliciting funds) after 7:00 p.m.  The Mission engages in residential solicitations between 5:00 p.m. and 8:00 p.m. on weekdays. The court held that prior cases "have continuously found that curfews prior to 9:00 p.m. are not sufficiently connected to a municipality's interest in crime prevention" to meet the compelling interest- least restrictive means requirement for content-based regulation of speech.

According to the Mercer Island Reporter, City Council will meet on Feb. 23 to amend the solicitation ordinance to comply with the court's holding.

Cert Filed In RLUIPA Zoning Case

AP reported yesterday that a petition for certiorari has been filed with the U.S. Supreme Court in Chabad Lubavitch of Litchfield County, Inc. v. Litchfield Historic District Commission,  In the case, the U.S. Second Circuit Court of Appeals held that the district court had applied erroneous legal standards in deciding whether a refusal to allow a Jewish group to expand a building in Litchfield's Historic District violates RLUIPA’s substantial burden and nondiscrimination provisions. (See prior posting).

Chicago Muslim School Head Charged With Sexual Abuse of Female Staffer and Students

AP reported yesterday that 75-year old Mohammad Abdullah Saleem, founder and long-time head of the suburban Chicago Institute of Islamic Education, has been criminally charged with sexually abusing a female school employee beginning in 2012. Saleem denies the allegations.  Saleem has also been sued civilly by the female victim and three female former-students who also allege sexual abuse dating back as early as the 1980's. Saleem is considered a leading Islamic scholar in the U.S. The civil suit charges the school with failure to protect students and asks for over $1.5 million in damages.

Apocalyptic Visions and ISIS' Actions

CNN's Peter Bergen posted a column yesterday titled Why Does ISIS Keep Making Enemies?, explaining the violent murders by ISIS as the "ideology ... of an apocalyptic cult that believes that we are living in the end times and that ISIS' actions are hastening the moment when this will happen." He argues that ISIS is focused on a prediction of the Prophet Mohammed that the Syrian town of Dabiq is the place where the armies of Islam and "Rome" will meet for the final battle that will precede the end of time and signal the triumph of Islam. Bergen says that ISIS wants a Western ground force to invade Syria to confirm the prophecy about Dabiq.  (A much longer analysis of ISIS ideology appears in an article by Graeme Wood in the latest issue of The Atlantic.)

As reported by Time Magazine, ISIS' video released Sunday showing the execution of 21 Egyptian Coptic Christians is narrated in religious terms. The executioner points his knife toward the Mediterranean and says in English: "We will conquer Rome, by Allah’s permission."

Yesterday, in an address to representatives of the Church of Scotland, Pope Francis responded to the ISIS killings in equally religious terms (full text):

Today I read about the execution of those twenty-one or twenty-two Coptic Christians.... They were killed simply for the fact that they were Christians.... The blood of our Christian brothers and sisters is a testimony which cries out to be heard. It makes no difference whether they be Catholics, Orthodox, Copts or Protestants. They are Christians! Their blood is one and the same. Their blood confesses Christ. As we recall these brothers and sisters who died only because they confessed Christ, I ask that we encourage each another to go forward with this ecumenism which is giving us strength, the ecumenism of blood. The martyrs belong to all Christians.

The White House, however, went out of its way to avoid framing its response to ISIS' latest atrocities in the kind of apocalyptic terms ISIS apparently prefers.  Sunday's statement by the White House press secretary (full text) after the release of ISIS' video studiously avoided painting the murders in terms of an Islamic battle against Christianity, saying in part:

The United States condemns the despicable and cowardly murder of twenty-one Egyptian citizens in Libya by ISIL-affiliated terrorists.... ISIL’s barbarity knows no bounds.  It is unconstrained by faith, sect, or ethnicity.  This wanton killing of innocents is just the most recent of the many vicious acts perpetrated by ISIL-affiliated terrorists against the people of the region, including the murders of dozens of Egyptian soldiers in the Sinai, which only further galvanizes the international community to unite against ISIL.

Three Australian Rabbis Resign As Result of Government Inquiry Into Sex Abuse Scandals

JTA reported yesterday that in Australia, three leading Orthodox rabbis have resigned from at least some of their positions as a result of an inquiry by Australia’s Royal Commission into how Chabad officials responded to child sex abuse scandals in the 1980's and 90's at two institutions-- Yeshivah College in Melbourne and Sydney’s Yeshivah Centre. Yesterday's  Melbourne Herald Sun has additional details.

The Guardian reports that a turning point in the Commission's inquiry came earlier this month when Rabbi Moshe Gutnick, a senior judge of the Sydney Beth Din, told the Commission that a "culture of cover-up, often couched in religious terms" had pervaded the two schools. One of those resigning was the country's most senior rabbi-- Meir Shlomo Kluwgant, president of the Organisation of Rabbis of Australasia. His resignation was prompted by a text message he sent while the father of one of the abuse victims was testifying before the Commission. He labeled the father "a lunatic on the fringe, [who is] guilty of neglect of his own children..." Another of those resigning admitted to the Commission that in 2002 he did not know it was illegal for an adult to touch a child's genitals.

Woman Charged In Attack On Neighbor to Force Christian Belief

The Forward yesterday reported on the Feb. 12 arraignment in Boise, Idaho of a 58-year old Christian woman arrested on charges of malicious harassment of her Jewish neighbor.  According to the article:

Haragan went to AG’s home on Feb. 5 and banged on her window while shouting that she “better believe in Jesus,” and that she would not leave until AG did...  When AG opened the door to get Haragan’s license plate number, Haragan slapped her in the face, pulled her hair and threw her to the ground where she kicked her in the stomach, and then pressed her foot into AG’s throat until the Jewish woman said she would believe in Jesus.

The court has ordered Haragan to have no further contact with AG.

Philadelphia Church Members Sue Claiming Board Misappropriation

The Philadelphia Tribune reported yesterday on a state court lawsuit filed Feb. 5 by members of Philadelphia's historic Zion Baptist Church against the board of trustees and long-time church member Ronald Harper.  The suit alleges that Harper as chairman of the trustees misappropriated and misused church assets for personal gain and profit for his law firm.  Plaintiffs claim that and the board hid the transactions by making misrepresentations to the deacon board and church membership.  The suit seeks an accounting and a forensic audit of the issuance of $18 million in bonds to renovate a church-owned apartment building. The suit also seeks a new membership vote on the ouster of the church's former pastor, Carl Prince, who allegedly was removed because he sought greater financial accountability.

Recent Articles of Interest

From SSRN:

• Rene F. Najera & Dorit Rubinstein Reiss, First Do No Harm: Protecting Patients Through Immunizing Health Care Workers, (February 8, 2015).
• Seval Yildirim, Conceptions of Religion in the Secular State: Evolving Turkish Secularism, (Pepperdine Law Review, Vol. 41, No. 1049, 2014).
• William P. Marshall, Bad Statutes Make Bad Law: Hobby Lobby v. Burwell, (Supreme Court Review, Vol. 2014).
• Andrew Koppelman, Theorists, Get Over Yourselves: A Response to Steven D. Smith, (41 Pepperdine Law Review 937 (2014)).
• Tom Syring, Introductory Note to the European Court of Human Rights’ Judgment on the Legality of a Ban on Wearing Full-Face Veils in Public (Case of S.A.S. v. France), (53 International Legal Materials 1025 (2014)).
• Douglas NeJaime & Reva Siegel, Conscience Wars: Complicity-Based Conscience Claims in Religion and Politics, (Yale Law Journal, Vol. 124, 2015 Forthcoming).

From SmartCILP:

• Michael J. Davidson, Sanctuary: A Modern Legal Anachronism (.pdf download), 42 Capital University Law Review 583-618 (2014).
• Roza Pati, Marshalling the Forces of Good: Religion and the Fight Against Human Trafficking, (Abstract), 9 Intercultural Human Rights Law Review 1-23 (2014).
• Sr. Eugenia Bonetti, Women Helping Women: The Italian Experience of Women Religious in Combating Human Trafficking and Modern-Day Slavery, (Abstract), 9 Intercultural Human Rights Law Review 25-39 (2014).
• Fr. Jude O. Ezeanokwasa, The Priest-Penitent Privilege Revisited: A Reply To the Statutes of Abrogation, (Abstract), 9 Intercultural Human Rights Law Review 41-102 (2014).

6th Cirucit Upholds Damage Award To Critic of Judge For Expressing Religious Views

In Pucci v. Nineteenth District Court, (6th Cir., Feb. 13, 2015), the U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the $734,000 damage award to court employee Julie Pucci who was fired after she complained to the Michigan State Court Administrative Office about Judge Mark W. Somers' expressing of religious views in the course of performing his judicial duties. It also affirmed the award of over $416,.000 in attorneys' fees. The court upheld the jury's findings that in complaining to SCAO, Pucci was speaking as a citizen on a matter of public concern. (See prior related posting.)

Tennessee Supreme Court Upholds Spiritual Healing Exemption Interpreted Narrowly

In State of Tennessee v. Crank, (TN Sup. Ct.,Feb. 13, 2015), the Tennessee Supreme Court upheld the conviction and sentence to 1-year probation of Jacqueline Crank, a member of the Universal Life Church, who was indicted for child neglect based upon her failure to obtain medical treatment for her daughter.  Her daughter died at age 15 of a rare form of cancer.  Crank argued for acquittal based on Tennessee's "spiritual treatment" statute, TN Code Ann.39-15-402(c), that prevents prosecution of parents who "provide[] treatment by spiritual means through prayer alone in accordance with the tenets or practices of a recognized church or religious denomination by a duly accredited practitioner thereof in lieu of medical or surgical treatment." The trial court however held that the Universal Life Church did not qualify as a "recognized church or religious denomination."  Crank appealed arguing that the exemption is unconstitutionally vague, and violates the Establishment and Equal Protection Clauses.  The Tennessee Supreme Court rejected the vagueness argument, holding:

Viewed in context, it is apparent that the legislative intent was for the exemption to apply to members of religious bodies which, like the Church of Christian Science, are established institutions with doctrines or customs that authorize healers within the church to perform spiritual treatment via prayer in lieu of medical care. Because the exemption is effectively limited to members of religious groups that closely resemble the Christian Science Church, the terms at issue are not so vague that the scope of the exemption “cannot be ascertained.”

Then, addressing Crank's argument that the exemption narrowed in this way violates the Establishment Clause and Equal Protection Clause, the Supreme Court said it need not decide that question because, even if Crank is correct, this would lead to elision of the entire spiritual treatment exemption from the child neglect statute. The Court issued a press release and summary of the decision. AP reports on the decision.

Recent Prisoner Free Exercise Cases

In Banks v. Secretary Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, (3d Cir., Feb. 9, 2015), the 3rd Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a Muslim inmate's challenge to prison policies on participation in feasts of Eid al-Fitr and Eid al-Adha, and to the use of prayer oils during religious services.

In Harris v. Pimentel, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15338 (ED CA, Feb. 9, 2015), a California federal magistrate judge recommended refusing to strike an inmate's complaint that his cell was searched and his Qur'an kicked under the bed, defiled with a boot mark.

In Richardson v. Cheshire County, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15903 (D NH, Feb. 6, 2015), a New Hampshire federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendation (2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15902, Jan. 14, 2015) and dismissed a Muslim inmate's complaint regarding the meals he received during Ramadan.

In Abdulkarim v. Metropolitan Sheriff Department, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16609 (MD TN, Feb. 11, 2015), a Tennessee federal district court allowed an inmate to proceed with his claim that his jail will not provide religious services for Muslim inmates.

In Woodside-Fisher v. Pulley, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17319 (WD CA, Feb. 12, 2015), a California federal district court, adopting a magistrate's recommendation, dismissed an inmate's complaint that his food was tampered with because it was a halal food tray, his non-halal tray was not replaced on 3 occasions, an officer made remarks about his religion, and on one occasion he did not have time for a shower because he was praying.

In Gamble v. Kenworthy, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17587 (ED NC, Feb. 12, 2015), a North Carolina federal district court dismissed a Muslim inmate's complaint that control status inmates were not allowed to receive special food from outside the institution for Eid al Fitr.

In Scheeler v. Lehigh County Prison, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17781 (ED PA, Feb. 12, 2015), a Pennsylvania federal district court dismissed for failure to exhaust administrative remedies and inmate's complaint that he was denied access to his Bible while in the Restricted Housing Unit for 9 days.

House Holds Hearing On RFRA and RLUIPA

Yesterday the House Judiciary Committee's Subcommittee on the Constitution and Civil Justice held a hearing titled Oversight of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act and the Religious Land Use and Instituionalized Persons Act.  The full text of the prepared statements of the four witnesses appearing at the hearing are available on the Committee's website.

Groups Seek Alabama Supreme Court Mandaumus To Stop Same-Sex Marriage Licenses

While Probate Judges in 50 of Alabama's 67 counties have begun to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples, opposition to a federal district court's invalidation of the state's same-sex marriage ban has not ended.  The Alabama Policy Institute and the Alabama Citizens Action Program filed a petition (full text) with the Alabama Supreme Court on Wednesday seeking a writ of mandamus ordering county probate judges not to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples or recognize licenses issued to them. The petition argues that fededral court injunctions aimed at the state's attorney general do not bind probate judges. The Supreme Court yesterday issued an order, with two justices filing dissenting opinions, (full text) ordering respondents to file answers by Feb. 18.  Justice Shaw dissenting said: "I would urge restraint and would urge this Court not to interject more confusion into what is already a very confusing situation."  Also yesterday Equality Alabama filed and amicus brief (full text) urging dismissal of the petition. Meanwhile, a Mississippi Ku Klux Klan faction called for support of efforts to defy federal court same-sex marriage rulings.

Rabbi May Be Charged In Up To 88 Cases of Voyeurism

Times of Israel reports on a closed-door meeting held Wednesday evening in Washington, D.C. between federal prosecutors and alleged victims of Rabbi Barry Freundel who was arrested in October for secretly photographing women using the mikveh at Washington's Kesher Israel Synagogue. (See prior posting.)  Currently Freundel has been charged with six misdemeanor counts of voyeurism under D.C. Code Sec. 22-3531(b)-(c).  However, those attending were told that Freundel taped a total of 152 women. Prosecutors say that charges may be filed in a total of 88 of the cases. Either the statute of limitations has run, or the victim cannot be identified, in the other 64 cases. If convicted, Freundel could be sentenced to a $1000 fine and one year in jail on each count.  Prosecutors may negotiate a plea deal, but they say it would have to include jail time. If the cases go to trial, victims would have to identify themselves in the videos, and would be subject to cross-examination.

New Museum of the Bible Being Built In Washington, D.C.

A privately financed $400 million Museum of the Bible is being constructed in Washington, D.C. according to a report today from Haaretz. The Museum, which will be located three blocks from the U.S. Capitol in a historic warehouse that is being extensively renovated, is being built by Steve and Jackie Green, owners of Hobby Lobby stores.  It will house the 40,000 item collection of rare printed Bibles, manuscripts, Torahs and Dead Sea scroll fragments belonging to the Greens who are Southern Baptists. The Museum will feature permanent exhibits focusing on the impact, history and narrative of the Bible, as well as rotating displays. Scheduled to open in November 2017, the Museum plans to collaborate with Jewish organizations.

European Court Says Bulgaria's Treatment of Word of Life Member Violated Religious Freedom

In Dimitrova v. Bulgaria, (ECHR, Feb. 10, 2015), the European Court of Human Rights in a Chamber Judgment held that police action against a member of the Word of Life church violated her religious freedom rights protected by the European Convention on Human Rights. As recounted by the Court:

[A] complaint was submitted to the office of the Sofia City Public Prosecutor by the Directorate of Religious Denominations with the Council of Ministers, raising concerns about the activities of Word of Life in Bulgaria. ... [H]aving carried out an investigation, the prosecutor’s office adopted a decision stating that the “sect” had an influence on its followers which increased the risk of suicide and other psychological problems. Membership might lead to the severance of family and social ties with the wider community; followers were prohibited from watching television or reading literature other than the Bible or from undergoing any form of surgical intervention. In conclusion, the prosecutor decided to order the restriction of the right of members of the three organisations linked to Word of Life from assembling to promote their beliefs and from continuing to operate the Bible study centre....

[T]he applicant was summonsed to appear at the police station and ... a search of her flat was carried out, with a number of personal items seized, for the sole reason that she was known to be a member of the Word of Life community and had organised religious meetings at her home. Following the search, she was issued by the police with an order warning her not to host further meetings of Word of Life.... In these circumstances, since the police action was taken in direct response to the applicant’s manifestation of her religious belief and was intended to discourage her from worshipping and observing her religion further in community with others, the Court finds that it constituted a limitation on her freedom to manifest religion within the meaning of Article 9 § 2.

Law & Religion UK has more on the decision.

Federal District Court Orders Alabama County To Resume Issuing Marriage Licenses

In Alabama, marriage equality litigants have finally found the procedural key to obtaining an injunction to require Mobile County Probate Judge Don Davis to open the marriage license division and issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples.  On Feb. 10, plaintiffs amended their complaint in their case challenging Alabama's same-sex marriage laws to name Judge Davis as a defendant. Two days later in Strawser v. Strange, (SD AL, Feb. 12, 2015)-- the case that had already led to an injunction against the attorney general-- the court issued a preliminary injunction barring Judge Davis, and "all his officers, agents, servants and employees, and others in active concert or participation with any of them" from refusing to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples.

Meanwhile yesterday morning (before the district court issued its injunction against Judge Davis), Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice Roy Moore gave a lengthy interview (full transcript) to CNN anchor Chris Cuomo, reiterating his view that Alabama courts are not bound by the district court decisions recognizing same-sex marriage.

Canadian Court Invalidates No-Veil Policy In Taking Citizenship Oath

According to yesterday's Regina Leader-Post, a Canadian Federal Court has struck down the Canadian government's policy of requiring women who wear a face veil for religious reasons to remove it when they take the oath of Canadian citizenship. In a suit brought by a Sunni Muslim woman who immigrated to Canada from Pakistan, the court held that the policy violates the government's own citizenship regulations.  Those regulations require "the greatest possible freedom in the religious solemnization" in taking the oath. (See prior related posting.)

Challengers Move Toward Success In Fraud Suit Against Conversion Therapy Provider

Plaintiffs in recent days have won two important state court victories in a New Jersey consumer fraud lawsuit against an organization that offers "conversion therapy" to gay men. In Ferguson v. JONAH (Jews Offering New Alternatives For Healing), (NJ Super. Ct. Feb. 5, 2015), the trial court ruled that expert testimony of five proposed witnesses, and part of the expert testimony of a sixth, should be excluded at trial.  The court said in part:

[T]he theory that homosexuality is a disorder is not novel but -- like the notion that the earth is flat and the sun revolves around it -- instead is outdated and refuted. Homosexuality was listed as a mental disorder in the DSM until its removal in 1973.... JONAH has not identified any case that provides a standard for the admission of obsolete and discredited scientific theories. By definition, such theories are unreliable and can offer no assistance to the jury, but rather present only confusion and prejudice.

A Southern Poverty Law Center press release has more details.

Plaintiffs' second win came in  Ferguson v. JONAH (Jews Offering New Alternatives For Healing), (NJ Super. Ct. Feb. 10, 2015).  The court granted partial summary judgment to plaintiffs, holding in part that:

it is a misrepresentation in violation of the CFA [Consumer Fraud Act], in advertising or selling conversion therapy services to describe homosexuality ... as being a mental illness, disease, disorder, or equivalent thereof....

The court also held that it is a CFA violation to advertise conversion therapy success statistics when there is no factual basis for calculating the statistics. As reported by The Advocate, a jury must still decide whether defendant made these kinds of misrepresentations. [See prior related posting.]

Russian Supreme Court Upholds Hijab Ban

According to World Bulletin, Russia's Supreme Court yesterday upheld the ban imposed by Russia's Mordovia region on the wearing of the hijab in schools. The appeal to Russia's top court was brought by the Muslim Tatar community in Mordovia.  The ban also applies to religious symbols, as well as to piercings, mini-skirts, jeans and bright-colored hair.

Former Prison Chaplain Pleads Guilty To Passing Messages From Imprisoned Hit Man

The Chicago Tribune reports that yesterday Roman Catholic priest and former prison chaplain Eugene Klein entered a guilty plea in an Illinois federal district court to charges of passing messages hidden in religious materials from an imprisoned mob hit man to a friend when the inmate was restricted in his contact with outsiders. The messages had to do with how to get a valuable violin out of a house that the federal government had seized. As part of his plea agreement, Klein reserved the right to appeal the trial court's refusal to dismiss the charges against him on constitutional grounds.

3rd Circuit Upholds ACA Contraceptive Coverage Accommodation For Religious Non-Profits

In Geneva College v. Secretary U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, (3d Cir., Feb. 11, 2015), the U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the Obama administration's accommodation under the Affordable Care Act for religious non-profits that object to furnishing contraceptive coverage. The court rejected claims by the non-profits that the accommodation imposes a substantial burden on their religious exercise in violation of RFRA.  The court said in part:

While the Supreme Court reinforced in Hobby Lobby that we should defer to the reasonableness of the appellees’ religious beliefs, this does not bar our objective evaluation of the nature of the claimed burden and the substantiality of that burden on the appellees’ religious exercise. This involves an assessment of how the regulatory measure actually works. Indeed, how else are we to decide whether the appellees’ religious exercise is substantially burdened? 

... [W]e cannot agree with the appellees’ characterization of the effect of submitting the form as triggering, facilitating, or making them complicit in the provision of contraceptive coverage. At oral argument, the appellees argued that it was not merely the filing of the form that imposed a burden, but, rather, what follows from it. But free exercise jurisprudence instructs that we are to examine the act the appellees must perform—not the effect of that act—to see if it burdens substantially the appellees’ religious exercise.

The court also rejected the argument that the regulations improperly partition the Catholic Church by preventing religious non-profits from claiming the total exemption available to the diocese with which they are affiliated. Pittsburgh Post-Gazette reports on the decision.

UPDATE: On May 6, the mandate was stayed (full text of order) pending U.S. Supreme Court action in Zubik v. Burwell which raises similar issues. (See prior related posting.)

Former NYPD Officer Sues Claiming Anti-Semitic Harassment From Co-Workers

JNS.org reported yesterday on a federal lawsuit filed last month by a former New York City Police Department officer charging that he was forced out of his position by six years of anti-Semitic comments and harassment from fellow officers.  The 26-page complaint (full text) in Attali v. City of New York, (SD NY, filed 1/21/2015), says that the abuse became particularly bad after plaintiff was assigned to the World Trade Center command in 2011.  It alleges, among other incidents, that beginning in January 2013:

Plaintiff ATTALI's co-workers, repeatedly, and without provocation, vandalized Plaintiff's locker at the WTC Command by writing hateful and abusive language and messages consisting of swastikas, newspaper clippings of pork, ham, salami and bacon advertisements, the word "DIRTY JEW" carved into an orange sticker and the following letters cut out of various newspaper headlines: "HAIL HITLER."

Georgia School Sued Over Classroom Prayers

As reported by the Atlanta Journal Constitution, on Monday the Freedom From Religion Foundation and a non-religious family filed suit against the Emanuel County, Georgia school system challenging a school's use of prayers in kindergarten and first grade classrooms.  The complaint (full text) in Freedom From Religion Foundation, Inc. v. Emanuel County School System, (SD GA, filed 2/9/2015), alleges that when parents complained about teachers' leading the classes in prayer, the teachers' response was to require objecting students to sit in the hallway while other students prayed.  The teachers also made comments in front of the class embarrassing to the objecting students, pressuring the first grader to pray with the rest of the class until her parents learned of the situation.  The suit seeks an injunction and damages for the school's violation of the Establishment Clause.

Kansas Governor Eliminates Anti-Discrimination Protection For LGBT State Employees

Yesterday Kansas Gov. Sam Brownback issued executive orders narrowing employment discrimination protections for state employees.  As reported by the Wichita Eagle and a press release from the governor's office, Brownback replaced former Gov. Kathleen Sebelius' employment practices order with a new one.  The new executive order eliminates the former ban on state employment discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity, while continuing to ban various other types of discrimination.  According to the Governor:

This Executive Order ensures that state employees enjoy the same civil rights as all Kansans without creating additional ‘protected classes’ as the previous order did, Any such expansion of ‘protected classes’ should be done by the legislature and not through unilateral action.

Former Israeli Chief Rabbi Indicted For Bribery

YNet News reported yesterday that Israel's former Ashkenazi Chief Rabbi Yonna Metzger has been indicted for bribery, fraud and money laundering.  Israeli authorities charge that Metzger received bribes totalling 10M NIS ($826,000 US), of which he personally kept 70%.  The bribes came, among others, from wealthy businessmen seeking to convert to Judaism, and for other services he performed in his role as Chief Rabbi. Many of the bribes came in the form of donations to non-profit organizations tied to Metzger. (See prior related posting.)

India Supreme Court Upholds State Work Rule Barring Polygamy

In Khan v. State of U.P., (India Sup. Ct., Feb.9, 2015), a 2-judge bench of the Supreme Court of India upheld the constitutionality of a rule of the government of the state of Uttar Pradesh barring employees from having more than one wife.  The court held that while Muslim personal law may permit up to four wives, the rule does not violate the provision of Art. 25 of India's Constitution that protects the right to freely profess, practice and propagate religion. Quoting from an earlier decision, the Court said:

What is permitted or not prohibited by a religion does not become a religious practice or a positive tenet of a religion.... Assuming the practice of having more wives than one... is a practice followed by any community or group of people, the same can be regulated or prohibited by legislation in the interest of public order, morality and health or by any law providing for social welfare and reform which the impugned legislation clearly does.

The Economic Times reports on the decision.

Data On Europe's Falling Jewish Population Published

The Pew Research Center yesterday published data on the continuing decline of Europe's Jewish population:

In 1939, there were 16.6 million Jews worldwide, and a majority of them – 9.5 million, or 57% – lived in Europe... By the end of World War II, in 1945, the Jewish population of Europe had shrunk to 3.8 million, or 35% of the world’s 11 million Jews. About 6 million European Jews were killed during the Holocaust, according to common estimates.

Since then, the global Jewish population – estimated by Pew Research at 14 million as of 2010 – has risen, but it is still smaller than it was before the Holocaust. And in the decades since 1945, the Jewish population in Europe has continued to decline. In 1960, it was about 3.2 million; by 1991, it fell to 2 million.... Now, there are about 1.4 million Jews in Europe – just 10% of the world’s Jewish population, and 0.2% of Europe’s total population.

Interposition Ordered By Alabama Chief Justice On Same-Sex Marriage

Interposition-- a doctrine rarely seen since the early days of the civil rights movement-- seems to be close to reappearing in Alabama's response to federal court same-sex marriage decisions.  As previously reported, on Jan. 27 Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice Roy Moore sent a letter to Alabama Governor Robert Bentley urging defiance at least of lower federal court decisions validating same-sex marriage in the state.  With the U.S. Supreme Court's order earlier today refusing to stay a federal district court order in Strange v. Searcy invalidating the state's same-sex marriage ban, same-sex marriages began in some Alabama counties.  But as reported by the New York Times, at least 50 of Alabama's 67 county probate courts were not issuing licenses to same-sex couples.

The confusion stems in part from an Administrative Order issued yesterday by Alabama Chief Justice Moore providing in part:

To ensure the orderly administration of justice within the State of Alabama, to alleviate a situation adversely affecting the administration of justice within the State, and to harmonize the administration of justice between the Alabama judicial branch and the federal courts in Alabama:

Effective immediately, no Probate Judge of the State of Alabama nor any agent or employee of any Alabama Probate Judge shall issue or recognize a marriage license that is inconsistent with Article 1, Section 36.03, of the Alabama Constitution or § 30-1-19, Ala. Code 1975.

Should any Probate Judge of this state fail to follow the Constitution and statutes of Alabama as stated, it would be the responsibility of the Chief Executive Officer of the State of Alabama, Governor Robert Bentley....

However, in response Gov. Bentley issued a statement saying in part:

This issue has created confusion with conflicting direction for Probate Judges in Alabama. Probate Judges have a unique responsibility in our state, and I support them. I will not take any action against Probate Judges, which would only serve to further complicate this issue.

 Earlier today, plaintiffs in the Searcy case filed a motion with an Alabama federal district court asking it to hold in contempt the Probate Court judge in Mobile County who, without explanation, has not opened the court's marriage license division today. [Thanks to Tom Rutledge for the lead on part of this post.]

UPDATE: In a Feb. 9 opinion (full text), the district court refused to hold the Probate Judge in contempt since the injunction did not directly order him to do anything.