Federal Court In Habeas Action Finds California Prosecutor's Use of Biblical References Prejudicial

In Roybal v. Davis, (SD CA, Dec. 2, 2015), a California federal district court granted penalty phase habeas corpus relief in a petition brought by a defendant who had been sentenced to death by a California state jury in the robbery and stabbing murder of a 65-year old woman.  The district court found that the California Supreme Court was "objectively unreasonable" in concluding that improper argument by the prosecutor during the penalty phase of the murder trial was harmless error and not prejudicial to the defendant. (People v. Roybal,  (1998)). At issue were Biblical references made by the prosecutor.  The district court, in a very lengthy opinion dealing with numerous other objections as well, said in part:

It is without question that the prosecutor improperly urged the jurors to impose a death sentence on Petitioner based on biblical law.... [T]he prosecutor did not stop with simply drawing parallels between state law and biblical law which, in itself, would have been misconduct. He went on to quote directly from the Bible, asserting that biblical text demanded a specific punishment for murder.... Such argument could only have been meant to urge the jurors to find justification for a death sentence in biblical text, authority well outside the penal code, and to subvert or frustrate their consideration of the proper sentencing factors under state law....

Here, the prosecutor's unambiguous, repeated, and carefully timed improper exhortations to the jury to apply biblical law diminished the jurors' sense of personal decision-making for the imposition of the death penalty. In so many words, the jury was informed that the Bible requires a murderer who kills with iron (i.e. knife) to himself be put to death. The prosecutor's improper argument presented an intolerable danger that the jury minimized its role as factfinder and encouraged jurors to vote for death because it was God's will, and not that the imposition of the death penalty complied with California and federal law.....

As discussed above, the California Supreme Court correctly found that the prosecutor's religious argument was misconduct and fell outside the bounds of both state and federal law, but unreasonably found that the comments were not prejudicial.

San Diego Union Tribune reports on the decision.

9th Circuit Hears Arguments In Suit Over FBI Infiltration of Mosques

Yesterday the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral arguments (video of full arguments) in Fazaga v. FBI.  The class action lawsuit against the FBI and FBI agents alleges that the government wrongfully spied on mainstream mosques in Southern California and targeted Muslims for surveillance because of their religion. (ACLU case page.)  In the case, a California federal district court dismissed claims against the FBI because of the state secrets privilege, agreeing that national security would be endangered by disclosing targets in counter-terrorism investigations. The court, however, permitted claims under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act against individual FBI agents and supervisors to proceed. (See prior posting.) Politico reports on yesterday's oral arguments, in which all the questions to counsel were asked by Judge Berzon.

Another County Clerk's Religious Response To Issuing Same-Sex Marriage Licenses

The latest kerfuffle over marriage equality has surfaced in Kiowa, Colorado where the Ebert County Clerk-- responsible for marriage licenses-- has hung a controversial poster above the desks where marriage licenses are issued. According to Denver7 News, the poster, made specifically in response to the legalization of same-sex marriage, shows a bride and groom along with a Biblical quotation (I Corinthians 7:2) reading "...each man should have his own wife and each woman her own husband."  County Clerk Dallas Schroeder explained in an e-mail to other county clerks:

My thought process is that they [same-sex couples] have to see the poster, and if they choose to violate God’s written Word, then that is on their head.

Muslim Student Sues Missouri Prof Over Alleged Bigoted Comments

Yesterday's Missourian reports on a lawsuit filed Nov. 30 against University of Missouri biology professor Michael Garcia by Fatma El-Walid, an observant Muslim student who was in one of Garcia's classes.  The suit, seeking $25,000 in damages, claims that the professor directed offensive and bigoted comments at the student during office hours, resulting in trauma that impacted her grades and the loss of a scholarship. According to the report:

The lawsuit alleges that ... Garcia asked El-Walid if her parents had waterboarded her "as a child in preparation for the future," wanted to know if her faith made her hate gay people and Jews, suggested she should pose as a suicide bomber and made sexually suggestive remarks, among other comments.

Garcia's lawyer says his client denies the charges.

Britain's Commission on Religion In Public Life Issues Final Report

The Commission on Religion and Belief in British Public Life-- created by the Woolf Institute in 2013-- released its final report yesterday. The Commission was chaired by a distinguished retired British judge, Baroness Elizabeth Butler-Sloss. The 104-page report titled Living With Difference-- Community, Diversity and the Common Good makes wide-ranging recommendations.  It identifies important religious changes in Britain over the past 50 years: an increase in the number of non-religious individuals; a general decline in Christian affiliation, belief and practice; and increased diversity of religious beliefs among those who profess a religion. The report sets out a broad vision:

The commission’s vision is of a society at ease with itself in which all individuals, groups and communities feel at home, and in whose flrishing all wish to take part. In such a society all:

• feel a positive part of an ongoing national story – what it means to be British is not fixed and final, for people in the past understood the concept differently from the way it is seen today and all must be able to participate in shaping its meaning for the future

• are treated with equal respect and concern by the law, the state and public authorities

• know that their culture, religion and beliefs are embraced as part of a continuing process of mutual enrichment, and that their contributions to the texture of the nation’s common life are valued

• are free to express and practise their beliefs, religious or otherwise, providing they do not constrict the rights and freedoms of others

• are confdent in helping to shape public policy

• feel challenged to respond to the many manifest ills in wider society.

The Guardian reports on some of the Commission's recommendations, focusing particularly on those affecting schools.

Santeria Priest Extradited To Massachusetts To Face Trial For Stealing Human Remains

According to CBS Connecticut, Amador Medina-- a 32 year old man who says he is a Santeria priest-- waived extradition back to Massachusetts in a Connecticut court hearing today.  Medina is accused of stealing five sets of human remains from a mausoleum in a cemetery in Worcester, Massachusetts, in order to use them in healing rituals.  As reported by the Canon Place Mercury, the skeletal remains date from the early 1900's.  Medina cooperated with police and showed them where the remains were in his Hartford apartment.  The Connecticut judge set Medina's bond at $300,000 and ordered mental health treatment for him.  Medina is unemployed and will not be able to post the bond.

Catholic Diocese of Duluth Files For Bankruptcy Reorganization

The Catholic Diocese of Duluth announced yesterday that it has filed on an emergency basis for bankruptcy protection in order to reorganize under Chapter 11.  The move comes after a jury last month found the Diocese liable for  $4.9 million in a clergy abuse case dating back to 1978. (See prior posting.) As reported by AP, the diocese faces five other sex abuse lawsuits that have already been filed, and has received notices of claims in 12 more.  Minnesota's 2013 Child Victims Act opened a statute of limitations window that closes next May for suit to be filed on old abuse claims. Plaintiff's attorney says that the bankruptcy stay delays attempts to force release of church documents on clergy sex abuse. A hearing on a motion to force release had been scheduled for December 17.  The Diocese's vicar general said that the filing safeguards the Diocese's limited assets, allows it to continue its day-to-day work, and ensures that all victims share justly in the resources available. This is the 15th U.S. diocese or religious order to file for bankruptcy reorganization.

Judge Rejects Challenge To Florida's School Voucher Program

According to AP, yesterday a Florida state trial court judge refused to grant a preliminary injunction against operation of the state's two main school voucher programs. State Circuit Judge George Reynolds held that plaintiffs lacked standing to challenge the program that provides private school tuition for children with disabilities.  He concluded that the other program that provides tuition assistance to low income families did not run afoul of state constitutional provisions, even though they allowed vouchers for attendance at religiously affiliated schools.  Another suit broadly challenging the adequacy of state funding for education however is still moving forward.

Virginia Jury Awards Muslim Cabbie $350,000 in Religiously Motivated Assault Case

Washington Post reports that a Fairfax County, Virginia civil jury yesterday awarded $100,000 in compensatory damages and $250,000 in punitive damages to a Muslim cab driver who was suffered a broken jaw in an assault by a passenger after the passenger engaged in a diatribe against the Muslim religion. The assault by Ed Dahlberg, a Fairfax County businessman, on cab driver Mohamed Salim was captured in part on video.  The jury found that Dahlberg's actions were motivated by animosity toward Salim's religion.

Donald Trump Calls For Ban on Muslims Entering United States

Acting in contradiction to the policy approach urged yesterday by President Obama (see prior posting), Republican front-runner Donald Trump this afternoon issued a statement (full text) calling for a complete ban on Muslims entering the United States.  The statement reads:

Donald J. Trump is calling for a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country's representatives can figure out what is going on. According to Pew Research, among others, there is great hatred towards Americans by large segments of the Muslim population. Most recently, a poll from the Center for Security Policy released data showing "25% of those polled agreed that violence against Americans here in the United States is justified as a part of the global jihad" and 51% of those polled, "agreed that Muslims in America should have the choice of being governed according to Shariah." Shariah authorizes such atrocities as murder against non-believers who won't convert, beheadings and more unthinkable acts that pose great harm to Americans, especially women.

Mr. Trump stated, "Without looking at the various polling data, it is obvious to anybody the hatred is beyond comprehension. Where this hatred comes from and why we will have to determine. Until we are able to determine and understand this problem and the dangerous threat it poses, our country cannot be the victims of horrendous attacks by people that believe only in Jihad, and have no sense of reason or respect for human life. If I win the election for President, we are going to Make America Great Again."

European Court Upholds Hungary's Refusal To Award Damages To Dismissed Pastor

Last week in a Chamber Judgment, the European Court of Human Rights held by a 4-3 vote that there had not been a violation of the European Convention on Human Rights, Sec. 6(1), when Hungary refused to adjudicate a dispute between a pastor and his Hungarian Calvinist Church.  At issue were claims by a pastor who had been terminated by the Church for stating in a local newspaper that State subsidies had been paid unlawfully to a Calvinist boarding school.  In Nagy v. Hungary, (ECHR, Dec. 1, 2015), a majority of the court, with fragmented reasoning spanning two opinions, concluded that there had not been a denial of the right to a hearing in the civil courts, particularly when a claim could have been brought in ecclesiastical courts.  Three judges dissented, saying in part:

[I]t is more than doubtful that it would be possible at all to show that (and how) the settlement, by a State court, of the pecuniary dispute between the applicant and the Calvinist Church could pose a “real” and “substantial” risk to that church’s autonomy.

The Chamber Judgment may be appealed to the Grand Chamber. ADF issued a press release on the decision.

Focus On the U.S. Muslim Community In the Wake of the San Bernardino Shootings

Last night, just days after the San Bernardino killings, President Obama addressed the nation on issues of terrorism and keeping the country safe. (Full text of Oval Office speech). A portion of his remarks addressed the relationship of all Americans with the American Muslim community:

We cannot turn against one another by letting this fight be defined as a war between America and Islam. That, too, is what groups like ISIL want. ISIL does not speak for Islam. They are thugs and killers, part of a cult of death, and they account for a tiny fraction of more than a billion Muslims around the world — including millions of patriotic Muslim Americans who reject their hateful ideology. Moreover, the vast majority of terrorist victims around the world are Muslim. If we’re to succeed in defeating terrorism we must enlist Muslim communities as some of our strongest allies, rather than push them away through suspicion and hate.

That does not mean denying the fact that an extremist ideology has spread within some Muslim communities. This is a real problem that Muslims must confront, without excuse. Muslim leaders here and around the globe have to continue working with us to decisively and unequivocally reject the hateful ideology that groups like ISIL and al Qaeda promote; to speak out against not just acts of violence, but also those interpretations of Islam that are incompatible with the values of religious tolerance, mutual respect, and human dignity.

But just as it is the responsibility of Muslims around the world to root out misguided ideas that lead to radicalization, it is the responsibility of all Americans — of every faith — to reject discrimination. It is our responsibility to reject religious tests on who we admit into this country. It’s our responsibility to reject proposals that Muslim Americans should somehow be treated differently. Because when we travel down that road, we lose. That kind of divisiveness, that betrayal of our values plays into the hands of groups like ISIL. Muslim Americans are our friends and our neighbors, our co-workers, our sports heroes — and, yes, they are our men and women in uniform who are willing to die in defense of our country. We have to remember that.

The Muslim community is rethinking its responses to violence committed by Islamic radicals.  An AP article yesterday reports:

[S]ome in the Muslim community say a new game plan is needed. A younger generation is especially impatient with the condemnations of Islamic extremism from Muslim groups after every attack. They argue that the statements merely reinforce false notions that Muslims are collectively responsible for the violence

And a group of American Muslims last week launched the Muslim Reform Movement with a Declaration (full text) that rejects interpretations of Islam that call for violence, social injustice or politicized Islam.

Meanwhile, a Reuters poll released yesterday finds that 51% of Americans view Muslims living in the United States the same as any other community, while 14.6% are generally fearful of Muslims living in the U.S. However 34.7% say they are fearful of "a few groups and individuals" in the Muslim community.  Some 69% of Republicans surveyed and 48% of Democrats favor closing mosques suspected of having extremist ties.

Recent Articles of Interest and New Bibliography

From SSRN:

• Jens T. Theilen, Towards Acceptance of Religious Pluralism: The Federal Constitutional Court's Second Judgment on Muslim Teachers Wearing Headscarves, (German Yearbook of International Law 58 (2015)).
• Julia Rackow, From Conflict to Cooperation: The Relationship between Karlsruhe and Strasbourg, (in Katja S Ziegler, Elizabeth Wicks and Loveday Hodson (eds), The UK and European Human Rights: A Strained Relationship?, (Hart, 2015) (draft version)).
• Luke Beck, When Is an Office or Public Trust 'Under the Commonwealth' for the Purposes of the Religious Tests Clause of the Australian Constitution?, (Monash University Law Review, Vol. 41, No. 1, pp. 17-39, 2015).
• Haroun Rahimi, The Customary Practice of Gerawee in Afghanistan: A Case for Transitioning to Real Equity-Based Finance, (Indonesian Journal of International & Comparative Law, 2015).

From SmartCILP:

• M. Cherif Bassiouni, Misunderstanding Islam on the Use of Violence, 37 Houston Journal of International Law 643-677 (2015).
• Bonnie Honig, The Laws of the Sabbath (poetry): Arendt, Heine, and the Politics of Debt, 5 University of California Irvine Law Review 463-482 (2015).
• Karen A. Jordan, The Contraceptive Mandate: Compelling Interest or Ideology?, 41 Journal of Legislation 1-64 (2014-15).
• Yehiel S. Kaplan, Immigration Policy of Israel: The Unique Perspective of a Jewish State, 31 Touro Law Review 1089-1135 (2015).
• James A. Sonne, Domestic Applications of Sharia and the Exercise of Ordered Liberty, 45 Seton Hall Law Review 717-759 (2015).
• Gila Stopler, The Right to an Exclusively Religious Education--The Ultra-Orthodox Community in Israel in Comparative Perspective, 42 Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law 743-796 (2014).
• Shaheer Tarin, An Analysis of the Influence of Islamic law on Saudi Arabia's Arbitration and Dispute Resolution Practices, [Abstract], 26 American Review of International Arbitration 131-154 (2015).
• Christopher Blain, Employing One's "Talents": The Power of Innovative Bond Transactions to Finance Catholic Nonprofits, 33 Journal of Law  Commerce 207-238 (2015).
• Philip Hamburger, Exclusion and Equality: How Exclusion From the Political Process Renders Religious Liberty Unequal, 90 Notre Dame Law Review 1919-1980 (2015).

Bibliography:

• The 2015 Law and Religion Bibliography, a 35-page bibliography of books, articles and blogs published in 2015, has been distributed as part of the AALS Section on Law and Religion Dec. 2015 Newsletter.

Hawaii Supreme Court Requires New Hearing For Proposed Telescope On Sacred Land

In Mauna Kea Anaina Hou v. Board of Land and Natural Resources, (HI Sup. Ct., Dec. 2, 2015), the Hawaii Supreme Court vacated on due process grounds a decision by the state's Board of Land and Natural Resources that allowed the University of Hawaii to construct a 30 meter telescope on land sacred to Native Hawaiians.  At issue was a "next generation" large telescope to be built on Mauna Kea, a dormant volcano on the island of Hawaii.  The court held that the Board acted improperly in approving the permit for the telescope, with construction merely delayed until a contested hearing on objections was held.  The majority held that the due process clause of the Hawaii constitution was violated when a contested hearing was not held prior to a decision on granting the permit. A concurring opinion by Justice Pollack, joined by Justice Wilson and joined in part by Justice McKenna, held that the Board's action violated other provisions of the state's constitution as well, including Ar. XII, Sec. 7 that protects cultural and religious rights of descendants of Native Hawaiians.  Christian Science Monitor reports on the decision.

Recent Prisoner Free Exercise Cases

In Cowart v. LaCasse, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 158333 (D SC, Nov. 24, 2015), a South Carolina federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendations (2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 158593, Oct. 26, 2015) and dismissed an inmate's complaint that  he believed the Common Fare diet which was marked kosher was in fact not kosher.

In Carpenter v. Extendicare Health Services, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 159876 D MN, Nov. 30, 2015), a Minnesota federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendations (2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 160141, Oct. 26, 2015) and dismissed on various grounds12 claims, including a free exercise claim, against a private nursing home that incorrectly believed plaintiff was the subject of a court order barring him from release.  The court found no state action.

In Farfan v. United States, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 160086 (SD FL, Nov. 24, 2015), a Florida federal magistrate judge recommended rejecting the claim by a federal inmate that her 144 month sentence for cocaine distribution violates RFRA because "she sincerely believes that God requires her to be at home with her family in order to properly observe holidays and rituals associated with her Catholic faith." The court responded in part: "The RFRA was enacted to encourage and protect free exercise of religion, even in a prison context. But it was never intended to be a get-out-of-jail-free card."

In McKnight v. MTC, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 160398 (ND TX, Nov. 30, 2015), a Texas federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendation (2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 160775, Nov. 9, 2015), and dismissed an inmate's claim that his free exercise and RLUIPA rights were infringed by housing him with a homosexual inmate.

Restrictions On Anti-Gay Marriage Protester Upheld

In Braun v. Terry, (ED WI, Nov. 30, 2015), a Wisconsin federal district court rejected claims by an anti-gay marriage protester that his free speech, equal protection and due process rights were infringed when authorities restricted the area in which he could carry his signs.  The events at issue occurred on the first day that same-sex marriage licenses were issued and marriages were conducted at the Milwaukee County Courthouse.  Plaintiff complains that he was not permitted to enter the courthouse to protest, and that the area in the park outside the courthouse where he could protest was restricted. The court found the restrictions imposed reasonable, non-discriminatory and narrowly tailored.

Mayor, Councilwoman Patch Up Dispute Over Christmas Tree

According to NJ.com, on Thursday, Roselle Park, New Jersey borough council voted 4-2 to go along with Mayor Carl Hokanson and change the name of the borough's annual "Tree Lighting" to "Christmas Tree Lighting."  This led Councilwoman Charlene Storey to resign, arguing that the renaming changed the ceremony "from a non-religious event to a religious one."  The mayor said that in going back to the event's traditional name, he was just calling the tree what it is. The mayor reached out to Storey, and after they met she withdrew her resignation.  The mayor in turn set up a new committee on diversity that Storey will chair.  She says she hopes the committee will come up with a process for groups to propose additions to the Christmas Tree Lighting and display, as well as deal with other diversity issues.  Both Hokanson and Storey are Democrats; Storey was raised Catholic, but is now a "non-believer."

Church's Suit Challenges Tax Decision Based On Project Gone Awry

In Panama City, Florida, the Faith Christian Family Church along with Markus Bishop, its owner and former pastor, filed suit last Monday against the Bay County Property Appraiser’s Office seeking to reverse a decision that restored three of the church's properties to the tax rolls. According to the Panama City News Herald, the dispute grows out of an innovative church project gone awry:

The church “wanted, as a form of religious and charitable outreach, to create a safe venue for young persons who might otherwise be endangered or tempted by the Spring Break revelry,” the complaint states. Faith Christian’s “intended concept was to offer a party-like but wholesome atmosphere, with music, food and non-alcoholic beverages. … Charitable outreach to persons who may be in need of a welcoming and safe refuge is a core religious principle of [Faith Christian’s] religious faith and practice.”

The complaint goes on to say that a promotion entity named Spring Break Amnesia was enlisted to market the outreach mission but “apparently had its own ideas for marketing and operation” by charging a $20 admission, selling sexually explicit merchandise and hosting naked paint parties and slumber-party Sundays.

For good measure, tax officials also revoked the non-profit status of a vacant lot next to the Life Center at which the spring break project took place, as well as the non-profit status of a mansion which the church claimed was a parsonage. The church claims that removing the properties' non-profit status infringed the church's First Amendment rights.

27 Sudanese Muslims Charged With Apostasy For Rejecting the Hadith

In Khartoum, Sudan, 27 defendants are on trial for apostasy.  According to Middle East Online and the Sudan Tribune, the charges under Sec. 126 of the Sudanese Criminal Code potentially carries a death sentence, but such a sentence is unlikely to be carried out.  The defendants are charged with preaching that only the Qur'an had religious authority, and rejecting the authority of the Hadith and of Sunnah.

Christian Camp Gets Preliminary Injunction Allowing It To Use Its Buses For Released Time Program

According to Public Opinion News, a Pennsylvania federal district court on Wednesday issued a preliminary injunction permitting Joy El Ministries to go back to using its own buses for its public school Released Time Bible Program while its lawsuit challenging state regulatory contentions is pending. The lawsuit, originally filed in state court, was removed to federal court by the state because it raises federal Establishment Clause issues. (Herald Mail Media).  As previously reported, Pennsylvania State Police cited the Greencastle, Pennsylvania Christian camp for transporting students to and from school for its a once-a-week "released time" program in buses that do not  meet the standards for vehicles owned by the school district or under contract with it.  Among other things, the buses used by Camp Joy El do not have swinging stop signs attached to the side, are not marked as school buses and are not painted with the specifically required yellow paint. The camp claims its buses are not school buses and its program is not an extracurricular activity, so that it is not covered by the regulations.  The camp has been renting other buses since state police cited it for violations.

Town Brings Back Nativity Scene-- This Time With Frosty and Reindeer

Last year, the town of Dallas, North Carolina moved its traditional nativity scene from the courthouse lawn to private property down the street under threat of a lawsuit from the Freedom From Religion Foundation. However many town residents were angry over the move.  So, according to WSOCTV News yesterday, this year a nativity scene is back on the courthouse lawn.  It is larger than the former one, but also includes figures of Frosty the Snowman and reindeer.  The city attorney told the town's Board of Aldermen that under Supreme Court rulings, a nativity display is permitted if it includes secular figures. FFRF still contends that the display is improper.

First Family Lights National Christmas Tree

Reuters reports that President Obama and his family yesterday led the lighting of the National Christmas Tree across the street from the White House.  Meanwhile, on a page titled Holidays at the White House, the White House website displays this year's White House Holiday Decor-- with the theme "A Timeless Tradition."

European Commission Appoints Officials To Combat Anti-Semitism and Anti-Muslim Hatred

The European Commission announced on Tuesday that it has appointed a Coordinator on Combating Antisemitism (Katharina von Schnurbein, a German national), and a Coordinator on Combating Anti-Muslim Hatred (David Friggieri, a national of Malta).  The new positions grew out of a Colloquium on Fundamental Rights held last October. [Thanks to Law & Religion UK for the lead.]

Church Gets Preliminary Injunction Under RLUIPA For Zoning Exclusion

In Hope Rising Community Church v. Municipality of Penn Hills, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 160148 (WD PA, Nov. 30, 2015), a Pennsylvania federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendation (2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 160852, Oct. 28, 2015) and granted a preliminary injunction to a church that was ordered to stop holding worship services in a warehouse building it leased in an area zoned only for "Light Industrial" uses.  The city also denied a zoning variance.  The court concluded that the city's zoning law violates RLUIPA's "equal terms" provision by not allowing churches as a permitted use in areas zoned "Light Industrial," given the other types of uses that are allowed. The court concluded that:

the City has failed to show how a religious institution would cause greater harm to the Light Industrial District and its objectives than parks, playgrounds and educational institutions [which are permitted].

Court Issues Preliminary Injunction Against School Show's Live Nativity Depiction

In Freedom From Religion Foundation v. Concord Community Schools, (ND IN, Dec. 2, 2015), an Indiana federal district court granted a preliminary injunction barring an Indiana school district from presenting its traditional live nativity scene as part of this year's school Christmas Spectacular show. The court said in part:

a reasonable observer would fairly believe that the portrayal of the living nativity scene, when viewed in the particular context, circumstances, and history of the Christmas Spectacular, conveys a message of endorsement of religion, or that a particular religious belief is favored or preferred.

The court held that the school's insertion, in response to the filing of this lawsuit, of short segments on Hanukkah and Kwanzaa did not cure the Establishment Clause problem:

the way in which Chanukah and Kwanzaa are being presented in the show in comparison to the Christmas portion in general and the nativity scene in particular actually serves to place greater emphasis on and suggest greater preference of the religious message conveyed by the nativity scene.

In its press release on the decision, FFRF says it continues to prepare for trial on the merits since the preliminary injunction applies only to this year's show.

UPDATE:  The Dec. 12 Goshen News reports that the school stayed in technical compliance with the preliminary injunction by featuring a static nativity scene using mannequins, in place of the enjoined live performance.

New Religion In Iceland Seeks To End Tax Support of Churches

According to yesterday's BBC News, in Iceland in recent weeks more than 1,000 people have registered as members of a new religious denomination, Zuism.  The relatively new religion bases its teachings on ancient Sumerian beliefs.  However its real goal is to end Iceland's parish fees-- a portion of each citizen's income tax that is allocated to the church with which the taxpayer is affiliated.  The new group also wants the government to end record keeping of citizens' religious affiliations.  The Zuist organization promises to rebate to its members any parish fees that are allocated to it. Tax authorities say any rebates will be subject to income tax.

Commentary: Will We See A Repeat of the "Kim Davis Saga" Over Transgender Rights?

As momentum grows to add "gender identity" to anti-discrimination laws, an interesting shift in argument by opponents can be discerned.  Until recently, opposition focused primarily on privacy concerns.  In the referendum battle earlier this year over Houston's Equal Rights Ordinance, while opposition was centered in churches, it was expressed in terms of concern about "allowing men to enter women's restrooms and locker rooms-- defying common sense and common decency." (See prior posting.)

In recent days, however, we are seeing a subtle shift that begins to frame opposition to transgender rights as a religious liberty issue.  Earlier this week, Liberty Counsel filed an amicus brief (full text) on behalf of an organization known as Liberty Center for Child Protection in a 4th Circuit case involving the right of a Virginia school board to limit the use of sex-segregated locker rooms and restrooms on the basis of an individual's biological features. Liberty Counsel's press release describes its position as one that focuses on child protection:

Public schools adopting “gender identity” instead of biological sex abandons science, creates a hostile environment, and threatens the safety and well-being of children...

However language in the brief began to lay the foundation for a religious liberty argument by describing early researchers on transgender issues as individuals who had an "animus for Judeo-Christian sexual mores" and who blamed "Judeo-Christian principles, instead of early sexual trauma and mental illness for the distress suffered by 'transsexuals.'"

Then yesterday a lengthy online article (full text) by the conservative writer Ryan T. Anderson set out perhaps the clearest formulation yet of the religious liberty claim:

SOGI [Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity] laws threaten the freedom of citizens, individually and in associations, to affirm their religious or moral convictions — convictions such as that marriage is the union of one man and one woman or that maleness and femaleness are objective biological realities to be valued and affirmed, not rejected or altered. Under SOGI laws, acting on these beliefs in a commercial or educational context could be actionable discrimination. These are the laws that have been used to penalize bakers, florists, photographers, schools, and adoption agencies when they declined to act against their convictions concerning marriage and sexuality. They do not adequately protect religious liberty or freedom of speech.

To the extent that compliance with laws barring discrimination on the basis of gender identity is viewed as a violation of religious conscience, we could well see a repeat of the "Kim Davis saga," this time in the form of school principals and superintendents blocking restroom doors.

Nativity Pageant Challengers May Sue Anonymously

In an order (full text) issued Monday, an Indiana federal magistrate judge allowed two individual plaintiffs in a lawsuit challenging an Indiana high school's Nativity Pageant to proceed anonymously. (See prior related posting.) Plaintiffs asked for the order "because one Doe Plaintiff is a minor, because of the history of violence and intimidation against plaintiffs in other Establishment Clause cases similar to this one, and because there is a reasonable expectation that the Doe Plaintiffs here will be the victims of harassment, injury, and other serious harm if their identities are made public."  Defendants did not object to the order.  The Elkhart Truth reports on the order.

South Africa's Jewish Community Creates Internal Body To Regulate Ritual Circumcision

According to yesterday's Jerusalem Post, South Africa's Jewish community is setting up its own Committee to oversee and regulate the practice of ritual circumcision in the nation.  The Committee will set requirements for circumcisions based on Jewish law and the highest standards of professionalism, health and safety.  The decision by Chief Rabbi Warren Goldstein and the Beth Din (rabbinic court) implements the recommendations of a commission of inquiry set up by the Jewish community after a serious malpractice incident by an elderly mohel last June.  In order to practice, a mohel will need to be accredited by the new committee, and have the accreditation renewed every two years. The country's Chief Rabbi has already imposed a lifetime ban on the mohel whose malpractice triggered the new recommendations.

Plaintiff In Clergy Abuse Case Alleged No Duty Owed To Him By Diocese

In Doe v. Tissera, 2015 Conn. Super. LEXIS 2757 (CT Super., Nov. 3, 2015), a Connecticut trial court held that while the 1st Amendment does not immunize the Hartford Roman Catholic Diocese from liability in connection with clergy sexual abuse claims, nevertheless plaintiff here failed to allege adequate facts to support his negligence and breach of fiduciary duty claims against the Diocese:

Doe's claims ... do not allege a reasonably foreseeable risk of harm giving rise to a duty owed by the diocese to Doe. Without properly alleging that the diocese owed him a duty, Doe has no cause of action against the diocese.

Court Rejects Establishment Clause Challenge To Bladensburg Cross

In American Humanist Association v. Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission, (D MD, Nov. 30, 2015), a Maryland federal district court rejected an Establishment Clause challenge to a 40-foot tall Veteran's Memorial in the shape of a cross. The so-called Bladensburg Cross was erected in 1925 by the American Legion at the intersection of two highways. The original ownership of the land on which it sits was unclear, but the land was eventually transferred to the state.  As Veterans Memorial Park, it is now also surrounded by other monuments. The court concluded that the cross does not have the effect of endorsing religion:

the predominant and nearly exclusive use of the Monument has been for annual commemorative events held on Memorial Day and Veterans Day....  In light of this history and context, of which a reasonable observer would be aware, the Monument "evokes far more than religion. It evokes thousands of small crosses in foreign fields marking the graves of Americans who fell in battles...." The evocation of foreign graves is particularly relevant here because, unlike crosses challenged in other cases, the Monument explicitly memorializes forty-nine servicemen who died in Europe during World War I, and the "cross developed into a central symbol of the American overseas cemetery" during and following World War I....

The Baltimore Sun reports on the decision.

Italian School Head Provokes Controversy By Canceling Christmas Concert In Favor of Winter Musical In January

With Italy's population becoming more religiously diverse, it is now facing the kind of issues regarding Christmas celebration in public schools that have been common in the United States.  Under attack from Italy's Prime Minister, the headmaster of a 1,000 pupil school in the town of Rozzano near Milan has been forced to resign after he canceled the school's traditional Christmas concert in favor of a non-religious Winter Concert in January.  AFP, The Telegraph and Deutsche Welle all reported yesterday on aspects of the story.  Before resigning, Marco Parma, headmaster of the Garofani comprehensive school whose student body is 20% non-Christian, said:

Last year we had a Christmas concert and some parents insisted on having carols. The Muslim children didn't sing, they just stood there, absolutely rigid.  It is not nice watching a child not singing or, worse, being called down from the stage by their parents.

The school's teachers backed the headmaster, but Italian Prime Minister Matteo Renzi was incensed, saying:

Discussion and dialogue does not mean to say we can drown our identity for the sake of a vague and insipid form of political correctness. Italians, both non-religious and Christians, will never give up Christmas.

The head of Italy's anti-immigrant Northern League went further, arguing that "canceling traditions is a favor for terrorists."

Recent Articles and Books of Interest

From SSRN:

• Prakash Shah, Does Durkheim Enhance Our Understanding of Law and Religion?, (Queen Mary School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 212/2015, Nov. 2015).
• Jeffrey M. Hirsch, EEOC v. Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc.: Mistakes, Same-Sex Marriage, and Unintended Consequences, (Texas Law Review, Vol. 94, 2015, Forthcoming).
• Nicholas Aroney, Faith in Public Office: The Meaning, Persistence and Importance of Oaths, (November 23, 2015).
• Lucia Ann Silecchia, Pope Francis and the Vocation of the Lawyer: Reflections on Service and Responsibility, (54 J. of Cath. Legal Stud. 23 (2015)).
• Lewis A. Grossman, Orthodoxy and 'The Other Man's Doxy': Medical Licensing and Medical Freedom in the Gilded Age, (November 19, 2015).
• Susan Frelich Appleton, The Forgotten Family Law of Eisenstadt v. Baird, (Yale Journal of Law & Feminism, Vol. 28:1, 2016).
• Cynthia Godsoe, Marriage Equality and the 'New' Maternalism, (California Law Review Circuit, Vol. 6, No. 145, 2015).
• Jay P. Greene & Cari A. Bogulski, The Effect of Public and Private Schooling on Anti-Semitism, (EDRE Working Paper No. 2015-10, Nov. 2015).
• Abdul Azeez Maruf Olayemi, et. al., Islamic Interbank Money Market: A Comparative Legal Study between Malaysia And Some Notable Jurisdictions, (2015 1 SHR, SHARIAH REPORT, A Journal of Islamic Law, Banking & Finance, Malaysian Current Law Journal (MCLJ)).
• Eric C. Chaffee, Collaboration Theory: A Theory of the Charitable Tax Exempt Nonprofit Corporation, (November 22, 2015).
• UPDATE: Netta Barak Corren, Does Anti-Discrimination Law Influence Religious Behavior?, (Hastings Law Journal, Forthcoming).

Recent Books:

• William Lazarus (with Sid Kleiner), Passover In Prison, (CreateSpace, July 2015).
• Saba Mahmood, Religious Difference in a Secular Age: A Minority Report, (Princeton Univ. Press, Nov. 2015).
• Katherine Franke, Wedlocked: The Perils of Marriage Equality, (NYU Press, Nov. 2015).
• William A. Schabas, The European Convention on Human Rights-- A Commentary, (Oxford Univ. Press, Nov. 2015).

Belgian Court Sentences French Comedian For Anti-Semitic Remarks

Last Wednesday, a Belgian court sentenced French comedian Dieudonne M’bala M’bala to prison for two months, and imposed a fine equivalent to $9,500 (US) on him for his anti-Semitic remarks during a comedy show in Belgium in 2012.  According to The Forward:

Judges said that the remarks, made in front of an audience of 1,100 people in the town of Herstal, were clearly calls to hatred and violence. By calling on Christians and Muslims to unite to kill Jews, he had incited genocide.

He was also ordered to pay for the entire text of the judgment against him to be printed in two leading French-language Belgian newspapers.

Dieudonne has prior convictions in France.  Earlier this month the European Court of Human Rights refused to reverse Dieudonne's conviction in France for Holocaust denial stemming from a different performance. (See prior posting.)

On Retrial Saudi Court Sentences Poet To Death For Apostasy

The Star Daily Standard yesterday reported on a Nov. 17 judgment by a Saudi Arabian court that sentenced Palestinian artist Ashraf Fayadh to death for apostasy, apparently concluding he was spreading atheism.  In his original trial, he was sentenced to 800 lashes and four years in prison on charges that his 2008 Arabic poetry book “Instructions Within” was insulting to God and religion. Also on the basis of photos in his phone, he was charged with illicit relations with women. Prosecutors appealed, seeking a harsher sentence, and the appeals court remanded for a new trial.  At that trial he was sentenced to death. According to the Daily Standard report:

While judges in the initial trial also accepted Fayadh’s repentance for anything deemed offensive or insulting to religion in his book of poetry, judges in the retrial questioned whether repentance can nullify a proscribed punishment in a case involving “hadd”, which in Islam are specific crimes such as apostasy for which punishment is considered fixed. They also wrote that Fayadh’s repentance could only be accepted by the divine, and therefor they could not consider it when weighing the verdict.

It is likely the case will be appealed again.

Recent Prisoner Free Exercise Cases

In Woods v. McClure, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 158973 (ED TX, Nov. 24, 2015), a Texas federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendation (2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 159291, Sept. 30, 2015) and dismissed a Rastafarian inmate's complaint that he was not permitted to properly celebrate the Rastafarian holy day, the birthday of Haile Selassie.

In Trapp v. Roden, (MA Sup. Jud. Ct., Nov. 23, 2015), the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court held that the closure of a Wampanoag Tribal sweat lodge at a Massachusetts prison facility, purportedly because of health concerns over the smoke it produced, violated RLUIPA as well as a 2003 settlement agreement. MassLive reports on the decision.

PennLive reports that on Tuesday, a Middle District of Pennsylvania federal district court judge, in a case on remand from the 3rd Circuit ordered the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections to comply with a June settlement agreement that requires Camp Hill prison authorities to allow Christian inmates 30 minutes of fellowship and group prayer in the dining hall on Christmas after the mainline Christmas dinner has been served and other prisoners have left.

African American Clergy Squabble Publicly Over Planned Endorsements of Donald Trump

As reported by Clutch, the Donald Trump campaign has been widely advertising a meeting on Monday between Trump and a group of well-known Black pastors. The meeting will be televised and streamed online live from the Trump Towers. Apparently a Trump campaign press release said that 100 African American religious leaders will appear with Trump on Monday to endorse him.  On Friday, a group of 114 other Black religious leaders and scholars published an Open Letter in Ebony strongly criticizing those who plan to meet with Trump, saying in part:

[A]s people of God, you know that our theology shapes our politics, and politics are a great indicator of our theology. What theology do you believe Mr. Trump possesses when his politics are so clearly anti-Black? He routinely engages in the kind of rhetoric that brings out the worst sorts of white racist aggression, not only toward Black people, but also toward Mexican-Americans and Muslim-Americans, too. Surely, we can agree that this kind of unloving and violent language does not reflect the politics of the Christ we profess?

In response to all of this, several of the clergy who plan to attend the Monday meeting made it clear that they have not committed to endorsing Trump.  According to the Daily Beast today, Bishop Clarence McClendon whose name leads the list of those advertised as planning to attend, said in a Facebook post:

I am not officially endorsing ANY candidate and when I do you will NOT need to hear it from pulpitting courtjesters who suffer from intellectual and spiritual myopia.

It is not clear that the 100 religious leaders who it was said will endorse Trump Monday are the same ones who are attending the advertised meeting.

Challenge To Gun Store's "Muslim Free Zone" Dismissed For Lack of Imminent Injury

In CAIR Florida, Inc. v. Teotwawki Investments, LLC, (SD FL, Nov. 24, 2015), a Florida federal district court dismissed a religious discrimination suit brought by a Muslim advocacy organization against a gun store and firing range whose owner announced (through a YouTube video) that it was implementing a "Muslim Free Zone."  The suit alleged that the declaration by Florida Gun Supply violates Title II of the 1964 Civil Rights Act which prohibits discrimination in places of public accommodation. (See prior posting.) The court held however that the announcement -- which was seen on national television-- did not threaten imminent harm.  The court agreed with defendant's contention that:

[T]here are no facts demonstrating that Plaintiff was (or will be) unlawfully discriminated against. There are no facts demonstrating that Plaintiff has attempted to purchase a firearm from Defendant and was denied on the basis of its religion or has attempted to attend a gun safety class and was denied on the basis of its religion or attempted to do anything at Defendant’s retail gun store and was denied on the basis of religion. And there are no allegations that Plaintiff will attempt to do any such activities at Defendant’s retail gun store in the future and be unlawfully denied on the basis of religion. Thus, Plaintiff has not alleged facts to demonstrate actual present harm or a significant possibility of future harm as required by Article III.

American Freedom Law Center, which represented defendants, issued a press release announcing the decision. Its press release described the announcement by Florida Gun Supply as a "refusal to equip Islamic terrorists." WND reports on the decision.

European Court Upholds French Hospital's Hijab Ban

The European Court of Human Rights yesterday, in a Chamber Judgment by a panel of 7 judges, upheld the decision of a French hospital to refuse to renew the employment contract of a Muslim social worker who insisted on wearing a headscarf (hijab). The full decision in Ebrahimian v. France, (ECHR, Nov. 26, 2015) is available in French (with a partial dissenting opinion in English). According to the Court's English press release on the decision:

[T]he Court found that the requirement of neutrality of public officials could be regarded as justified in principle: the State, as employer of the applicant in a public hospital, could consider it necessary that she refrain from expressing her religious beliefs in discharging her functions in order to guarantee equality of treatment of patients....  [T]he Court reiterated that while public officials enjoyed total freedom of conscience, they were prohibited from manifesting their religious beliefs in discharging their functions. Such a restriction derived from the principle of the secular nature of the State, and that of the neutrality of public services, principles in respect of which the Court had already approved a strict implementation where a founding principle of the State was involved.

The Court considered that the fact that the national courts had afforded greater weight to the principle of secularism-neutrality and the State’s interest than to Ms Ebrahimian’s interest in not having the expression of her religious beliefs restricted did not cause a problem with regard to the [European] Convention [on Human Rights].

A Chamber Judgment may be appealed to the ECHR Grand Chamber. The Scotsman reports on the decision.  [Thanks to Paul de Mello for the lead.]

Two Popes Impact Delicate International Decisions

Pope Francis yesterday spoke in Narobi, Kenya to a group of  United Nations officials (full text of speech) urging action at two upcoming international conferences. Focusing on COP21, the meeting beginning Nov. 30 in Paris on climate change, the Pope said in part:

In a few days an important meeting on climate change will be held in Paris, where the international community as such will once again confront these issues.  It would be sad, and I dare say even catastrophic, were particular interests to prevail over the common good and lead to manipulating information in order to protect their own plans and projects....

I express my hope that COP21 will achieve a global and “transformational” agreement based on the principles of solidarity, justice, equality and participation; an agreement which targets three complex and interdependent goals: lessening the impact of climate change, fighting poverty and ensuring respect for human dignity.

The Pope also spoke about the upcoming 10th Ministerial Conference of the World Trade Organization scheduled to meet in Narobi in a few days:

It is my hope that the deliberations of the forthcoming Nairobi Conference will not be a simple balancing of conflicting interests, but a genuine service to care of our common home and the integral development of persons, especially those in greatest need.  I would especially like to echo the concern of all those groups engaged in projects of development and health care – including those religious congregations which serve the poor and those most excluded – with regard to agreements on intellectual property and access to medicines and essential health care.  Regional free trade treaties dealing with the protection of intellectual property, particularly in the areas of pharmaceutics and biotechnology, should not only maintain intact the powers already granted to States by multilateral agreements, but should also be a means for ensuring a minimum of health care and access to basic treatment for all.

Meanwhile, Israeli and Arab sources differ on the political importance of a gesture by Egypt's Coptic Pope Tawadros II who yesterday left with a delegation of bishops for Jerusalem to take part in the funeral of Archbishop Anba Abraham, the Archbishop of Jerusalem.  This is the first visit of a Coptic pope to Jerusalem since 1832.  In 1979, the previous Coptic Pope barred Copts from traveling to Jerusalem, insisting they will only enter together with Muslims. The Jerusalem Post speculates that Tawadros' trip will make it increasingly difficult to maintain the ban on other Copts making a pilgrimage to Jerusalem. Zvi Mazel, a former Israeli ambassador to Egypt said that Tawadros probably got approval from Egypt's President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi who is maintaining close intelligence ties with Israel in the fight against ISIL in Sinai.

However, Gulf News quotes a Coptic Church spokesman who said that Tawadros' visit to Jerusalem, which the Church considers occupied territory, does not change the Church's position:

The Pope’s visit came as an exception. It is for offering condolences and nothing more.  Pope Tawadros II will not make any visits in the Holy Land, and he will return to Cairo immediately following the funeral prayers. Copts will only go to Jerusalem with their Muslim brethren.

British Court Says Religious Education Curriculum Must Include Non-Religious Beliefs

As reported by a British Humanist Association press release, a British High Court judge in London held yesterday that non-religious views, such as humanism, must be included in British schools' Religious Education studies.  In Fox v. Secretary of State for Education, (EWHC, Nov. 25, 2015), a judge held:

The Strasbourg jurisprudence shows that the duty of impartiality and neutrality owed by the state do not require equal air-time to be given to all shades of belief or conviction. An RE [Religious Education] syllabus can quite properly reflect the relative importance of different viewpoints within the relevant society. The same would seem to follow for a region or locality. The duty might therefore be described as one of “due” impartiality..... In addition, of course, a generous latitude must be allowed to the decision-maker as to how that works out in practical terms. But the complete exclusion of any study of nonreligious beliefs ... would not in my judgment be compatible with [the European Convention on Human Rights' provisions on the right to education].

Spain's Catholic Lawyers Sue Over Art Exhibit

In Spain, the Spanish Association of Christian Lawyers has filed a lawsuit seeking to close down a controversial art exhibit which opened in Pamplona City Hall last Friday  According to yesterday's The Local, the display-- a retrospective of the works of controversial 27-year old Spanish artist Abel Azcona-- includes a work titled "Amen" which consists of 242 holy wafers spelling out "paedophilia".  Azcona's critics claim that he stole the hosts used in the display by pretending to take Holy Communion, but then pocketing the wafers.  The lawsuit alleges that Azcona committed the crimes of desecration and crimes against religious sentiment under Spain’s Penal Code. On Tuesday evening the communion wafers disappeared as critics staged a protest, and city hall says that part of the display will not be replaced.

President Issues Proclamation for Thanksgiving 2015

Last week President Obama issued a Presidential Proclamation-- Thanksgiving Day 2015. It reads in part:

In the same spirit of togetherness and thanksgiving that inspired the Pilgrims and the Wampanoag, we pay tribute to people of every background and belief who contribute in their own unique ways to our country's story.  Each of us brings our own traditions, cultures, and recipes to this quintessential American holiday -- whether around dinner tables, in soup kitchens, or at home cheering on our favorite sports teams -- but we are all united in appreciation of the bounty of our Nation.  

Amicus Brief Filed In Appeal of Bankruptcy Stay of Jewish Religious Court Proceedings

As previously reported, in August a New York federal bankruptcy court held in the case of In re Congregation Birchos Yosef that the statutory automatic stay of proceedings against a debtor that is triggered by the filing of a petition in a bankruptcy reorganization applies to invalidate proceedings against a debtor and its principals in a Jewish religious court (beis din). That decision was appealed to the federal district court. Last week an interesting amicus brief (full text) was filed in that appeal by 3 well-known law professors and a former bankruptcy court judge urging reversal of the bankruptcy court's decision.  The 23-page brief argues in part:

given the intensely religious nature of the beis din proceeding, and the conceded inability of the beis din to enforce its rulings in any secular court, any effort by a bankruptcy tribunal to restrain the Bais Chinuch and other individuals from invoking the beis din as a parallel non-coercive forum of religious conscience violates the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment, the provisions of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (hereafter RFRA), and the Bankruptcy Code.

[Thanks to Max Raskin for the lead.]

Groups Say Texas Refusal To Accept Syrian Immigrants Infringes Religious Liberty of Resettlement Agencies

In an article yesterday, the New Republic reports that a number of faith-based refugee resettlement groups in Texas believe that the state's Health and Human Services Commission is infringing their religious liberty.  In a Nov. 19 letter, the Commission's Executive Commissioner told resettlement agencies that they should discontinue immediately any plans they have to resettle Syrian refugees in Texas.  This follows a Nov. 16 letter (full text) from Texas Gov. Greg Abbott to President Obama telling the President that Texas will not accept any Syrian refugees out of fear that they could be terrorists. Bee Moorhead, executive director of Texas Impact/Texas Interfaith Center for Public Policy, criticizes the Governor's position, saying:

Religious freedom is now the rhetorical currency of the right, but it’s turning out to be in implementation that what’s politically expedient for the right is not affirmative of religious freedom.

Obama Criticizes Growing Anti-Muslim Sentiment In United States

At his White House press conference yesterday (full text) with President Hollande of France, President Obama again criticized the anti-Muslim sentiment in the United States that has surfaced in the wake of ISIL's attacks in Paris, saying:

... [A]nother part of defeating terrorists like ISIL, is upholding the rights and freedoms that define our two great republics.  That includes freedom of religion.  That includes equality before the law.  There have been times in our history, in moments of fear, when we have failed to uphold our highest ideals, and it has been to our lasting regret.  We must uphold our ideals now.  Each of us, all of us, must show that America is strengthened by people of every faith and every background.

Russian Court Says Scientology Does Not Qualify As A Religious Organization

In Russia, the Moscow City Court yesterday in affirming a lower court decision backed the Ministry of Justice's efforts to close down the Church of Scientology.  According to AFP, the court ruled that since the Church has registered its name as a trademark in the United States, it cannot call itself a religious organization. The Church says it will appeal to Russia's Supreme Court.

Kim Davis' Case Continues to Defy Finality

The controversy surrounding Rowan County, Kentucky, Clerk Kim Davis' refusal to issue marriage license to same-sex couples is not over.  As previously reported, after being released from custody on contempt charges, Davis allowed others in her office to issue licenses, but only with revised wording. On Nov. 13, outgoing Governor Steven Beshear filed a response (full text) with the federal district court that had held Davis in contempt stating that:

those altered licenses are not fully consistent with Kentucky statute, but such deviations do not render the marriages ineffective.  Thus, the Third-Party Defendants have and will continue  to  recognize  as  valid  those  marriages  solemnized  pursuant  to  the  altered licenses for purposes of the governmental rights, benefits, and responsibilities conveyed by the Executive Branch agencies over which Governor Beshear exercises supervisory control.

This led the ACLU to file a motion (full text) on Nov. 20 urging to court to require licenses to be issued in their original unaltered form, stating:

As Governor Beshear has now recognized, Davis’ actions have created considerable uncertainty regarding the legality of the altered marriage licenses.  They impose significant and ongoing harm on Rowan County couples who are legally eligible to marry but now face doubt and fear that a marriage solemnized pursuant to an altered marriage license could be held invalid at some unknown time in the future. And Davis’ actions effectively brand the altered licenses with a stamp of animus against gay people. This Court can and should eliminate the uncertainty and harm by enforcing its prior orders....

Meanwhile, accordidng to the Nov. 6 International Business Times, Republican Kentucky Gov.-elect Matt Bevin says that when he is sworn in on Dec. 8, he will issue an executive order removing county clerks' names from state marriage licenses, hoping that this will resolve the problem.

Localities Adjusting Nativity Displays To Avoid Constitutional Problems

As the Christmas season approaches, cities and counties that traditionally placed Nativity Scenes on government property are now responding to constitutional challenges to them. Either in response to demand letters or to actual litigation, one of two types of responses is typical: (1) transfer the nativity scene to private ownership and display of  on private property; or (2) surrounding the nativity scene with numerous secular displays.

In Wadena, Minnesota, the nativity display previously placed in a public park was sold to the Wadena Ministerial Association for $25 and will be placed on a lawn across from the town's hospital.  Forum News Service reported yesterday that a town resident is also inviting others to display nativity scenes, attempting to break the record for the most creches displayed in one area.

In Franklin County, Indiana, the county avoided losing a lawsuit (see prior posting) by adopting an ordinance allowing county resident to erect their own displays on the courthouse lawn alongside the nativity scene. AP reported yesterday that the county has approved 9 displays, including one of George Washington, Benjamin Franklin and Thomas Jefferson huddled around a manger holding the Bill of Rights.

UPDATE: Fox19 reports that the banner put up by Freedom From Religion Foundation proclaiming "There are no gods, no angels, no heaven or hell" was stolen from the Franklin County Courthouse grounds over the Dec. 5 weekend.

Major British Theater Chains Reject Church of England Ad

The three largest movie chains in Britain-- Odeon, Cineworld and Vue-- all have policies against accepting political or religious advertising. Invoking these provisions, the theater chains have refused a 60 second advertisement produced by the Church of England promoting its JustPray.uk website.  According to Sunday's Guardian, the ad which the Church wanted to run before the showing of Star Wars: The Force Awakens (to be released Dec. 18) depicts each line of the Lord's Prayer being said by a different person, beginning with the Archbishop of Cantebury. The Church complained that this refusal chills free speech, and the Church's position has attracted some unexpected backers, including atheist (but free speech advocate) Richard Dawkins. [Thanks to Seth Tillman for the lead.]

Israel's Rabbinical High Court To Consider Retroactive Conversion Revocation Case

Times of Israel and Haaretz report on an appeal filed last week with Israel's Rabbinical High Court seeking reversal of a lower religious court's decision handed down in 2012 that retroactively invalidated a Christian woman's 1983 conversion to Judaism. The lower court's action was taken because the woman was not living the Orthodox Jewish life-style she had promised to lead at the time of her conversion. The appeal is being pursued by the woman's daughter because it calls into question her and her young daughter's religious status. It is expected that the High Court will reverse the invalidation because it usually refuses to retroactively invalidate conversions.

Recent Articles of Interest

From SSRN:

• Robin Boyle, Employing Trafficking Laws to Capture Elusive Leaders of Destructive Cults, (St. John's Legal Studies Research Paper No. 15-0030 (Nov. 2015)).
• Ruthann Robson, Justice Ginsburg's Obergefell v. Hodges, (University of Missouri-Kansas City Law Review, 2015).
• Kevin M. Barry, Jennifer Levi, Jennifer, Neelima Vanguri & Brian Farrell, A Bare Desire to Harm: Transgender People and the Equal Protection Clause, (Boston College Law Review, Forthcoming).
• Serena Mayeri, Marriage (In)Equality and the Historical Legacies of Feminism, (California Law Review Circuit, Vol. 6, Pg. 126, 2015).
• Ryan H. Nelson, Sexual Orientation Discrimination Under Title VII after Baldwin v. Foxx, (72 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. Online 255 (2015)).
• Abdul Azeez Maruf Olayemi, Abdul Majeed Hamzah Alabi & Ahmad Hidayah Buang, Islamic Human Rights Law: A Critical Evaluation of UIDHR & CDHRI in Context of UDHR, (Journal of Islam, Law and Judiciary, Vol. 1, Issue 3, 2015, pp. 27-36).
• Abdul Azeez Maruf Olayemi,  Aznan Hasan, Uzaimah Ibrahim & Ahmad Hidayah Buang, Non-Interest (Islamic) Liquidity Management in the Nigerian Non-Interest Banking: A Legal Study from the Experience of Malaysia, ([2015] 1 SHR, Shariah Report (A Journal on Islamic Law, Banking & Finance), Malaysian Current Law Journal (MCLJ)).

From SmartCILP:

• Peter Nash Swisher, "I Now Pronounce You Husband and Wives": The Case for Polygamous Marriage After United States v. Windsor and Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, 29 BYU Journal of Public Law 299-325 (2015).

Recent Prisoner Free Exercise Cases

In In re Pima County Mental Health No. MH64461112, 2015 Ariz. App. Unpub. LEXIS 1364 (AZ App., Nov. 10, 2015), an Arizona appeals court rejected appellant's claim that because she was receiving treatment in accordance with the tenets of Scientology the trial court should not have ordered her to continue to receive court-ordered mental health treatment.

In Schlemm v. Wall, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 155714 (WD WI, Nov. 18, 2015). a Wisconsin federal district court refused to allow a Native American inmate to amend his complaint to add a claim for damages, and ordered the case to proceed only as to declaratory and injunctive relief under RLUIPA as to plaintiff's complaint regarding venison for use during the Navajo Tribe Ghost Feast and wearing a multi-colored headband while praying in his cell and during group religious ceremonies.

In Brown v. Major, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 155632 (D SC, Nov. 18, 2015), a South Carolina federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendations (2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 155804, Oct. 30, 2015) and dismissed a Muslim inmate's complaint that he was denied a Kosher diet, the opportunity to pray in common areas, and a Quran.

Settlement Requires 1st Amendment Training For Hawaiian Police

On Nov. 16, a Hawaii federal district court approved a settlement agreement (full text) in Goodhue v. County of  Maui. In the lawsuit, a pastor and his wife charged that their First Amendment rights were infringed when police hired to provide security prevented them from handing out religious literature on sidewalks outside the Maui Fair.  As summarized in an ACLU press release:

As part of the settlement agreement, the County of Maui has dropped its appeal to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, and, for three years, will conduct additional specialized training for current and new Maui Police Department (“MPD”) officers on upholding the 1st Amendment in public spaces. 

Texas State Trooper Sues Over Religious Harassment By Co-Workers

According to the Austin Statesman, Texas state trooper Patsy Jones, assigned to work at the state Capitol, has filed a religious discrimination lawsuit alleging that her colleagues harassed her about being religious because she often reads her Bible at work.  She says that when she complained, her supervisor at the Texas Department of Public Safety suggested mediation with fellow-employees. When she declined, she was ordered to work from home for 6 months, and was then assigned to the night shift.

Suit Claims Four NY Yeshivas Deny Male Students Adequate Secular Education

The Lower Hudson Journal News reports that on Friday a class action lawsuit was filed in a New York federal district court by parents of students who attend various Orthodox Jewish schools in the East Ramapo school district and by former students of the schools claiming that the schools deny male students adequate secular coursework.  According to the report:

The claim contends that four Hasidic yeshivas in Monsey, Spring Valley and New Square do not teach English, "basic literacy, calculating, and verbal skills necessary to enable children to eventually function productively as civil participants."

The lawsuit also alleges that defendants have broken the law by:

• Failing to hire or train teachers and staff "capable" of teaching secular studies. 
• Discriminating against boys by providing girls with more robust secular studies.
• Failing to oversee or control yeshivas' use of tax money for their designated secular education purposes.
• Failing to properly equip students with English and other skills necessary to obtain employment, creating generations of people who are dependent on government assistance.

The suit asks the court to order and enforce a requirement of 3 hours per day of secular studies with competent teachers, and asks for remedial courses for prior graduates of the schools.

UPDATE: Here is the full text of the complaint in Doe v. State of New York, (SD NY, filed 11/20/2015). [Thanks to Friendly Atheist for the link to the complaint.]

Candidate Ted Cruz Is Organizing A National Prayer Team To Support His Bid

Yesterday Republican Presidential hopeful Sen. Ted Cruz announced that on Dec. 1 he will launch a national prayer team known as "A Time for Prayer." According to the announcement:

“A Time for Prayer”, led by Cruz Crew volunteers, is dedicated to a focused season of prayer on behalf of the nation, presidential candidate Ted Cruz, his family and staff, and the campaign.

Those interested in joining the National Prayer Team can visit www.tedcruz.org/pray to sign up. Members will receive weekly emails containing prayer requests and a short devotional. Each Tuesday, members will be invited to a 20-minute prayer conference call.

Trump's Call For Registration of U.S. Muslims Criticized By Democrats and Many Fellow-Republicans

The New York Times today reports that Democrats and many fellow-Republicans are criticizing Republican presidential hopeful Donald Trump's remarks supportive of a system to register all Muslims in the country.  Trump said it is merely an issue of "management." Hillary Clinton called Trump's comments "shocking rhetoric." Former Gov. Jeb Bush said in response to Trump's position: "You talk about closing mosques, you talk about registering people — that’s just wrong."

Nigerian State Will Monitor Churches and Mosques To Fight Hate Preaching

Vanguard reports today that in Nigeria, the Lagos state governor's office says it will take action to combat religious intolerance:

State Commissioner for Home Affairs, Dr. Abdulhakeem Abdullateef, explained that the government would stop any religion leader who preaches hate messages that is capable of endangering people’s freedom.  According to him, "Henceforth, we’ll start to monitor mosques and churches and ensure that clerics do not engage in hate preaching."...

Let it be known to residents that henceforth, Lagos government in collaboration with Nigeria Inter- Religious Council (NIREC), will not tolerate hate preachers. These are the people who do not preach their religion but continue to spread mischief about people of other religions. We will not tolerate religious intolerance.

EEOC Releases Its 2015 Performance Report

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission yesterday released its 2015 Performance and Accountability Report. (Full text.) The lengthy report focuses on how well the agency has implemented three performance objectives in combating employment discrimination: strategic law enforcement; education and outreach; and excellent and consistent service through a diverse workforce.

Library Settles Challenge To Use of Meeting Rooms and Changes Its Rules

Library Journal reported yesterday that the Lawrence, Massachusetts pubic library has changed the rules for the use of its meeting rooms after the city settled a lawsuit (see prior posting) challenging the ban on using the rooms for political or religious advocacy. The suit was brought by Liberty Counsel whose application to use a room for a session that would include prayer, hymns and an appeal to return the country to Christian values was turned down. The revised rules exclude use of meeting rooms only for private social events or for groups soliciting business, trying to make a profit or fundraising.

Defense Authorization Act Encourages Religious Diversity In The Armed Forces

After an initial veto by President Obama of the 2016 National Defense Authorization Act, Congress passed a revised version last week and on Monday sent it to the President for his signature.  It is expected the President will sign the bill. (Defense One.) The 1278-page bill (full text) contains at least 3 provision relating to religion or religious services in the military.

Section 504 permits extension of the mandatory retirement age of a chief chaplain or deputy chief of chaplains to 68. Section 898  provides that the Department of Defense may not preclude non-profit organizations from competing for contracts for religious related services at military installations.

The most important religion-related provision, however, is Section 528 which is a "sense of Congress" resolution encouraging diversity in the military. It reads:

(a) Findings-- Congress finds the following: (1) The United States military includes individuals with a variety of national, ethnic, and cultural backgrounds that have roots all over the world. (2) In addition to diverse backgrounds, members of the Armed Forces come from numerous religious traditions, including Christian, Hindu, Jewish, Muslim, Sikh, non-denominational, non-practicing, and many more. (3) Members of the Armed Forces from diverse backgrounds and religious traditions have lost their lives or been injured defending the national security of the United States. (4) Diversity contributes to the strength of the Armed Forces, and service members from different backgrounds and religious traditions share the same goal of defending the United States. (5) The unity of the Armed Forces reflects the strength in diversity that makes the United States a great nation.

(b) Sense of Congress-- It is the sense of Congress that the United States should (1) continue to recognize and promote diversity in the Armed Forces; and (2) honor those from all diverse backgrounds and religious traditions who have made sacrifices in serving the United States through the Armed Forces.

County Tries To Neutralize Courthouse Drawing of Jesus By Hanging Many Other Paintings

The Lexington Herald-Leader on Monday reported that a Kentucky county judge-executive responded to a complaint about a picture of Jesus hanging in the local courthouse by inviting local artists to submit other pictures to hang along side it.  After the Freedom From Religion Foundation sent a letter to Breathitt County Judge-Executive John Lester “JL” Smith in August asking him to remove the drawing of Jesus, Smith's response was to seek other artwork so that the walls now feature everything from landscapes to a portrait of Rachel Maddow to a drawing of Mr. Magoo.  An FFRF attorney argues however that this does not cure the original religious purpose for hanging the charcoal of a man kneeling before Jesus with the caption "In your place what would Jesus do."

CORRECTION: No Injunction Issued Against California's Reproductive FACT Act; Case Still Pending

Based on an error in a report by a news service, Religion Clause incorrectly reported last week that a California federal district court had issued a preliminary injunction barring the state of California from enforcing its recently enacted Reproductive FACT Act against two religiously affiliated pregnancy counseling centers. A proposed order has been filed by plaintiffs in A Woman's Friend Pregnancy Resource Center v. Harris, but a hearing on it will not take place until Dec. 18. Thanks to Stephen Blakeman for alerting me to the error, which the news service caught two days ago.

Kasich Would Create Agency To Promote Judeo-Christian Values To Counter ISIS

In a speech at the National Press Club yesterday, Ohio Governor John Kasich, a contender for the Republican presidential nomination, told his audience that if elected he would set up an agency with a mandate to promote Judeo-Christian values around the world.  According to the Huffington Post, Kasich says the agency would promote human rights, democracy and the freedom of speech, religion and association as a counter to the message of Islamic militants. Kasich would distribute the information to countries in the Middle East, and to China, Iran and Russia as part of the "battle of ideas" with ISIS.

Facebook Is Immune From Suit For Removing Sikh Group's Page In India

In Sikhs For Justice ("SFJ"), Inc. v. Facebook, Inc., (ND CA, Nov. 13, 2015), a California federal district court dismissed a lawsuit by a Sikh human rights group that objected to Facebook's blocking of access in India to the group's Facebook page.  The suit alleges that Facebook discriminated in violation of the public accommodation provisions of the 1964 Civil Rights Act when it collaborated with the government of India in retaliating against SFJ for its online campaign complaining about the treatment of Sikhs and promoting an independent Sikh state. (See prior posting.) The court held that Sec. 230 of the Communications Decency Act immunizes Facebook from liability.  That section immunizes interactive computer services from liability as a publisher of content posted by third parties.  The court agreed with Facebook that the lawsuit "is entirely based on Defendant’s blocking of the SFJ Page in India, which is publisher conduct immunized by the CDA." Courthouse News Service reports on the decision.

U.S. Catholic Bishops Debate Voters' Guide In Light of Pope Francis' Priorities

The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops report that among the actions taken yesterday at their Fall General Assembly was the adoption of a new introductory note to and limited revision of their quadrennial statement on political responsibility, "Forming Consciences for Faithful Citizenship." According to Religion News Service yesterday, the debate on revision of this voters' guide highlighted the split between those bishops who want to echo the priorities of Pope Francis and those who support more traditional priorities. San Diego Bishop Robert McElroy, objecting that revisions had not gone far enough, told the Assembly:

I believe that this document is gravely hobbled. Specifically, I think the pope is telling us that alongside the issues of abortion and euthanasia — which are central aspects of our commitment to transform this world — poverty and the degradation of the Earth are also central.  But this document keeps to the structure of the worldview of 2007. It does not put those there.